This weekend Quentin, Brad, and Harvey lit up their stogies following the exceptional opening of their new World War II film Inglourious Basterds which topped the charts and exceeded all industry expectations to lead a robust late-summer session at the box office. The frame's three other new releases got the cold shoulder from moviegoers but the overall top ten surged ahead of last year and 2007 by more than 25%. Holdovers contributed too as no film in the top ten declined by more than 50%.
Scoring his best opening ever in terms of both gross and admissions, Quentin Tarantino was once again on top of the movie world with his newest feature Inglourious Basterds which bowed to a stellar $37.6M, according to estimates. The much-needed hit for The Weinstein Co. averaged a sizzling $11,880 from 3,165 theaters and beat out the filmmaker's previous career best delivered by 2004's Kill Bill Vol 2 which the Weinstein brothers released when they were with Miramax. That bridal revenge saga bowed to $25.1M which would be about $30M at today's prices.
Basterds, an ensemble film that co-stars Brad Pitt as a leader of an American military group out to kill Nazis during the second World War, was the fifth R-rated film to top the charts this summer and along with last weekend's District 9 gave the marketplace back-to-back $37M+ R openers. Films in the second half of August rarely debut north of $30M.
Reviews were generally positive for Tarantino's newest venture which cost a reported $70M with Universal co-financing. Friday kicked off with $14.4M, Saturday dipped 10% to $12.9M which was not uncommon for this type of film from a popular director, and Sunday is estimated to dip 20% to $10.3M.
Tarantino also scored career best debuts around the world in several countries as the Europe-set drama launched in 22 territories through Universal grossing an estimated $27.5M for a glorious global opening of $65.1M. Helped by Pitt's worldwide appeal and a largely European cast, Basterds bowed at number one in several key markets such as Australia, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. A final global theatrical gross of three to four times the production budget could result.
Coming in behind the Nazis were the prawns of District 9. The alien drama enjoyed a solid second weekend, especially for a sci-fi film, by dropping 49% to an estimated $18.9M bumping the ten-day total to an impressive $73.5M to date. By comparison, last year's buzzworthy documentary-style monster movie Cloverfield tumbled 68% in its sophomore frame. With a relatively low $30M production cost, Sony's much-talked-about District 9 should find its way to a robust $120M or so from North America alone.
The much pricier popcorn flick G.I. Joe, still the widest film in release by far, declined by 44% and collected an estimated $12.5M in its third mission. Averaging $3,162 from an ultrawide 3,953 locations, the Paramount release has advanced its 17-day total to a solid $120.5M and still seems likely to break the $150M level.
A pair of female-skewing films with different trajectories followed. The romantic drama The Time Traveler's Wife fell a moderate 46% in its second weekend to an estimated $10M boosting the ten-day total to $37.4M. The cooking comedy Julie & Julia enjoyed better legs dipping only 25% in its third outing to an estimated $9M. Sony has banked an impressive $59.3M to date.
While Quentin was enjoying his best debut ever, his good buddy Robert Rodriguez suffered his worst opening ever for a wide release as family audiences ignored his new film Shorts which debuted to an estimated $6.6M. Ranking sixth, the Warner Bros. release averaged a weak $2,126 from a very wide 3,105 theaters. The performance did not come close to the openings of previous kidpics from the director including Spy Kids ($26.5M in March 2001) and The Adventures of Sharkboy and Lavagirl 3D ($12.6M in June 2005). Shorts tells a handful of stories about a group of boys that finds a magical rock that grants wishes.
Disney's G-Force held up well slipping just 39% to an estimated $4.2M boosting the total to $107.3M. Dropping 32% in its sixth round was Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince with an estimated $290.3M. Following in ninth was the romantic comedy The Ugly Truth with an estimated $2.9M, off 36%, giving Sony $82.9M to date.
Opening poorly in tenth was Fox's Post Grad with an estimated $2.8M from 1,959 locations for a dismal $1,429 average. The PG-13 pic stars Alexis Bledel of Gilmore Girls fame as a young jobless woman who recently finished college. Faring even worse was the extreme sports doc X Games 3D: The Movie which bowed to an estimated $800,000 from a very wide 1,399 theaters for an atrocious $572 average. Both new releases targeted teens and young adults in their final days of summer vacation but failed to offer anything worth paying top dollar for.
The top ten films grossed an estimated $108M which was up 31% from last year when Tropic Thunder remained in the top spot with $16.3M; and up 29% from 2007 when Superbad stayed at number one with $18M.
Author: Gitesh Pandya, Box Office Guru
|
Brian R. writes: on Aug 23 2009 06:43 PM Shorts was a good movie it just didn't advertise very well (Reply to this) |
|
MovieMaster writes: on Aug 23 2009 06:52 PM Glad to see Inglourious Basterds get the top spot. Also glad to see District 9 doing so well. (Reply to this) |
|
Mr. Bo Ziffer writes: on Aug 23 2009 07:04 PM I loved, loved, LOVED Inglourious Basterds! Probably the best movie I've seen in a long time! It really is a movie for the theaters, though. Listening to the audience's reactions was half of the fun! If I had to make one complaint, it would probably be that a few scenes ran too long with the dialouge. But once the action kicked in, it was so worth it. It's kind of like when you eat Lucky Charms, and you eat the all of the normal cereal up, and at the end you get all the soggy marshmallows at once! It's probably got the best ending to anything . . . ever! And sign Waltz up for an Acadamy award immediately! God, this movie was awesome! (Reply to this) |
|
michael l. writes: on Aug 23 2009 07:05 PM Inglourious! (Reply to this) |
|
ZZ writes: on Aug 23 2009 07:24 PM My Inglourious review: If you love cinema, you'll love Inglourious Basterds. Instantly you will see what Tarantino envisioned for Inglourious Basterds, and everything ties together so perfectly through near-perfect dialog and pitch-perfect pacing. This movie is over 2 1/2 hours long, but it barely felt 2 hours long, and I just didn't want it to end. I can go on forever raving about this movie, from the amazement I felt at the brilliant scenes to how the cast and the acting just felt right. The soundtrack is classic Tarantino. I immediately wanted to watch it again, just to make sure I didn't miss anything (which I'm sure I did, which excites me for my next viewing) No, it's not perfect, but it's one hell of a brilliant movie, and honestly, a favorite. (Reply to this) |
|
Boxman writes: on Aug 23 2009 07:27 PM District nine should have been number one again ,but then again the movie came at second so that's good. (Reply to this) |
|
thedownstar writes: on Aug 23 2009 07:30 PM I thought that Basterds' parts were greater than its collective whole, but was still worth watching. Glad to see District 9 doing so well in its second week. I must say though, in hindsight, this summer was actually pretty decent for thorough, layed filmaking. I realize each week we bemoan the anouncement of the several remakes in the works, but this summer offered dozens of original films. I say bravo for the summer of 09. (Reply to this) |
|
Brainstew writes: on Aug 23 2009 07:37 PM "District nine should have been number one again ,but then again the movie came at second so that's good." No way, District 9 was good for what it was, but Inglorious Basterds is quite simply classic film making. In terms of quality and talent the two films aren't even a comparison. Even if you enjoyed D9 more, the writing, directing editing and soundtrack in Inglorious Basterds simply blows it away. (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:02 PM If no one else is going to say it I will, Bravo for teen America. Not only did they reject the mindless schlock that was Post Grad, but they've also buried I love you Beth Cooper, and Bandslam this Summer. Even Miley Cyrus didn't do well and the by all accounts fairly solid 500 Days of Summer will probably be the most successful movie aimed at teens and tweens. Good for you guys, there's hope for the future. On another bright note, glad to see Inglourious open better than any other Tarantino movie. Yes, there was some excess of dialog, but that comes with the package of Tarantino and I thought it served the movie better than any other Tarantino dialog since his glory days and weak performances by Eli Roth and Mike Myers were minimized and overall overshadowed by brilliant turns by Brad Pitt, Melanie Laurent and Christoph Waltz who I agree turned in an Oscar worthy performance and is possibly the breakout star of the Summer. (Reply to this) |
|
oVo writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:08 PM In reply to this comment (#2540255) Get off your high chair. (Reply to this) |
|
Ace69 writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:09 PM Yes Inglorious Basterds ruled. (Reply to this) |
|
bondfreak writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:18 PM i cannot wait to see bastards now, i was at my cottage and missed it but now im stoked to see it, and its good to see that hollywood bounced back from the down in numbers July we just had, looks like were gonna be up from last year. GO MOVIES! (Reply to this) |
|
ZZ writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:18 PM @Mr. Bo Zypher I agree, Inglourious Basterds is better experienced with a large audience. (Reply to this) |
|
Gimy writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:20 PM saw Basterds and shoulda known by the critics love...that alot of it would be borderline crap. very frustrating movie to watch. some parts are so boring...yet others are top notch entertainment. everything that had the Basterds in it...was classic. ALMOST every scene they weren't in...was snooze worthy. i almost fell asleep halfway through. sorry, can't say it was "classic" if almost 1/3 is useless dialogue. Q definitely knows how to make a good movie(the way it looks, the GOOD dialogue, story, soundtrack, the suspense) but he should have cut AT LEAST 30 minutes off the run time. had he done that...it would have been great. since he didn't...gotta say its just "good". (Reply to this) |
|
sunsaz writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:33 PM The thing with Tarantino films is that you get more out of them if you are a die-hard movie fan and not a casual movie goer who only goes to the theaters 2 or 3 times a year. IB definitely continued that trend. It was very entertaining and some of the things that were head-scratchers at first were revealed as the film went along. Personally, I'm on board the "Christoph Weis for Best Supporting Actor nomination" bandwagon. (Reply to this) |
|
smartmoviekid writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:46 PM not only does Inglorious Basterds, along with the amazing District 9, end the summer in a high note, I personally found Christoph Waltz's performance to be the most sadistic and memorable villian since the Joker. Im expecting a best supporting actor nom, and a win on his end come oscar time. (Reply to this) |
|
jpbresnihan writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:47 PM i'm just going to go out on a limb and say it. Inglourious Basterds and District 9 are the best films of summer 2009. Star Trek is a very close third. anyone who disagrees can take it up with the bear jew. (Reply to this) |
|
skinkrawl writes: on Aug 23 2009 08:54 PM I go to the theater only a handful of times a year. I'm not an avid movie-goer. I'm an avid movie watcher (at home with good movies). That dreck they put into theaters is laughable at best. I did go see District 9, and all the trailers before it made me laugh hysterically (and I seriously doubt that was the intention). Why does everyone get so excited about the industry doing well? When the industry sunk to lows, that was often when the best films were created, because the studios went in different directions that brought about new art. Think about all the great films of the 70s that were made when the movie industry had sunk very, very low. (Reply to this) |
|
kaitune writes: on Aug 23 2009 09:16 PM Not everybody is going to love Inglorious Basterd (it depends a hell lot on how much you enjoy dialogues and long slo-w stress-building scenes), however, I LOVE it and I would say that it is a sweet treat to QT fans and most film lovers out there. Some parts may seem a bit slow, but when all the scenes finally led to an explosive ending, it is all worthwhile! Christoph Walkz should get a best supporting actor nom. His character is among the most enjoyable characters I have seen in films. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg1138 writes: on Aug 23 2009 09:16 PM Good to know we no longer award crap...for now. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |
















