Critics Consensus: Iron Man 3 is Certified Fresh

Plus, What Maisie Knew is a poignant drama.

This week at the movies, we've got only one new wide release in theaters, but it's a biggie: the hotly-anticipated Iron Man 3, starring Robert Downey Jr. and Gwyneth Paltrow. What do the critics have to say?

Iron Man 3

77%

They say that clothes make the man, but what's made the Iron Man franchise consistently rewarding is the man inside the suit; Robert Downey, Jr. is Tony Stark, perhaps the wittiest and coolest superhero alter-ego in contemporary cinema. The critics say Downey is in fine form in Iron Man 3, and director Shane Black (mostly) maintains the series' tricky balance between spectacle and light comedy while serving up a few intriguing tweaks to the formula. Tony Stark is still recovering from the events of The Avengers, while leaving the management of Stark International to Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow). Pepper is approached by an old colleague of Tony's about a new organic technology, but will it be a blessing or a curse -- and how will Iron Man respond to threats from a ruthless terrorist? The pundits say the Certified Fresh Iron Man 3 is a sharp, entertaining adventure and a strong addition to the Marvel canon. (Check out this week's Total Recall for a countdown of Downey's best-reviewed movies and 24 Frames for a gallery of notable part IIIs.)

Also opening this week in limited release:

  • You Will Be My Son, a psychological drama about an aging vineyard owner who wants to bequeath the property to a man who is not his son, is at 100 percent.
  • Dead Man's Burden, a Western about a Civil War vet who returns to his family's homestead to investigate the death of his father, is at 100 percent.
  • What Maisie Knew, starring Julianne Moore and Steve Coogan in a drama about the effects of divorce on a seven-year-old girl, is at 81 percent.
  • Olivier Assayas' Something in the Air, a semi-autobiographical period drama about a young man's coming of age during a period of political unrest in France, is at 80 percent.
  • Susanne Bier's Love Is All You Need, starring Pierce Brosnan in a romantic comedy about a pair of lovelorn souls who meet at a wedding in Italy, is at 76 percent.
  • Caroline And Jackie, a drama about two sisters whose shared past comes to light while on a birthday excursion, is at 71 percent.
  • The Iceman, starring Michael Shannon and Winona Ryder in a drama about the double life of a family man who's also a contract killer, is at 69 percent.
  • Scatter My Ashes At Bergdorf's, a documentary about the behind-the-scenes workings of the famous department store, is at 67 percent.
  • Kiss Of The Damned, about a lonely vampire whose budding love affair is interrupted by the arrival of her wild sister, is at 56 percent.
  • Greetings From Tim Buckley, starring Penn Badgley in a biopic of Jeff Buckley that also alludes to the life of his singer/songwriter father, is at 55 percent.
  • Post Tenebras Lux, an impressionistic drama about a wealthy Mexican family's internal dysfunction and class tension with its poorer neighbors, is at 45 percent.
  • 1st Night, starring Richard E. Grant and Sarah Brightman in a period comedy about a wealthy industrialist staging an opera at his mansion, is at 13 percent.
  • Generation Um..., starring Keanu Reeves as a man who films his travels with a pair of escorts around New York City, is at zero percent.

Comments

Rebeccachu Elizabeth C.

Rebecca Clark

It's good that the 3rd Iron Man is getting positive reviews. Cannot wait to see it!

May 2 - 04:36 PM

Dave J

Dave J

Quite a drop from the rating it initially started off from with which was 93%!

May 2 - 04:42 PM

shadypotential

Chris Cox

78 and droppin? lmao better change that consensus!

Dark Knight Rises remains king of the superhero threequel :success:

May 2 - 04:44 PM

Daniel Irwin

Daniel Irwin

Because Christopher Nolan is a brilliant mind whose never afraid to challenge himself at any time. Marvel, by the way, is just repeatedly kicking a dead horse.

May 2 - 05:48 PM

Chris Cook

Chris Cook

Despite that whole Dark Knight Rises being considered the worst of the three and that Iron Man 3 is a return to form thing, yeah, Nolan is awesome.

May 2 - 06:27 PM

Valmordas

Val Mordas

You know and I know a lot of these critics are paid to say nice things about bad movies. So I'd be hesitant to go see something based on what a critic thought of it... unless it was a smaller scale film they had no vested interest in.

May 2 - 06:34 PM

Ryan Nolan

Ryan Nolan

Val, proof?

Chris Cook, again, proof?

May 3 - 08:53 AM

Joe F.

Jay Gatsby

@Ryan Nolan Armond White was being paid. Why do you think he's not on RT anymore

May 3 - 04:27 PM

Joe F.

Jay Gatsby

@Chris And IM3 is being considered as the worst twist of a movie..... ever. And I have proof

May 3 - 04:29 PM

Valmordas

Val Mordas

Well I saw it, and I have honestly no idea what someone would be gushing about. All I can concede is that it was better than part two, for what it's worth. So the critics proclaiming it the best Iron Man movie yet, and other sorts of ridiculous nonsense... I'm really sure there's something funny going or, or they are watching a different movie than I did.

May 3 - 11:27 PM

King  S.

King Simba

Or they just had a different opinion?

Also, it's actually the smaller films that need critics more than the big blockbusters, which typically depend on the marketing team behind them more than anything else (example, The Last Airbender earned some of the worst reviews of the year and yet still made more than 300mil WW).

May 5 - 02:26 AM

Todd A.

Todd Anderson

Well Dark Knight Rises might be a solid film (despite the many plot holes and contrivances) but it is still the weakest of the series. So I don't think it beat the threequel curse. Where as most critics are saying this film is a return to form.

May 3 - 12:49 PM

Matanuki

Matanuki .

Beating the threequel curse means making a third film that doesn't mess up the other two and ultimately destroy the entire franchise. Rises defeated the curse in every measureable way. IT tied up the story beautifully, ending with Bruce achieving what he set out to achieve in the beginning. And it did very well at the box office. If Rises somehow didn't defeat the curse, then the curse has never been defeated.

May 4 - 02:59 PM

Gene Luke

Gene Luke

yes they are kicking several dead horses repeatedly!!!

May 5 - 02:39 PM

King Crunk

King Crunk

I agree Nolan's Batman trilogy is the best series of superhero films yet, but I think most agree that The Dark Knight Rises is the weakest of the three. I would still rate it around 85% personally, but that is a step below the previous two, which I would put between 95 and 100% a piece. There are just elements in TDKR that do not come together as nicely as they did in the Dark Knight, which was filled with characters and subplots that overlapped and collided at various points as well. Some of the moments and side characters could have been left out of the film completely (looking at you, Juno Temple, among others). The other problem I have with it is the fact that everybody was all up in arms about how there was no way Nolan could make a villain that was as compelling as Ledger's Joker, and what do you know, Hardy's Bane was pretty damn great. The problem? Nolan did not put enough of him in the movie! I would have preferred Nolan cut some side characters and plots and wrote more stuff for Bane, as well as included his origin and how he went down a path similar to Batman, but emerged differently. Would have been a nice mirror for Bruce Wayne to reflect and contemplate on, thus building him as a character further. That said, TDKR works very well mainly because it completes Nolan's thematic arc for the Batman mythos, which was very satisfying, and one of the reasons it stands above other superhero films, because Nolan ends up making the entire thing just as much about the stereotypical "save the day" plot as it is about Batman being more than a man, but being a symbol and an idea.

May 2 - 09:02 PM

Dave Cheng

Dave Cheng

yes sir. i'm surprised nobody has said this yet but hit the nail on the head.

May 2 - 09:30 PM

Ryan Nolan

Ryan Nolan

Pretty much agree here. I really liked TDKR but it did miss the mark on few things that kept it from being truly great. I'd it was as good as Begins though.

May 3 - 08:56 AM

Simon Kristiansen

Simon Kristiansen

Nolan ended up having to cut about 25 min from it. That made it less coherent.

May 3 - 09:12 AM

Joe F.

Jay Gatsby

Good. 25 minutes less of that overrated garbage

May 3 - 04:29 PM

Saetre

Saetre Saetre

That's a good thing. It was too long.

May 6 - 03:43 AM

Dave J

Dave J

I think Nolan was sidetracked after Heath Ledger's demise in what could've been the movie he wanted to make!

May 3 - 12:25 PM

Joshua Henderson

Joshua Henderson

You sound like you are trying to be competitive between Nolan movies an the rest of the superhero movies when crying out "success" like that. if so please get a life, Nolan movies don't have to be best at anything. You should strive for other movies to be as good not be biased on one franchise forever to stay the best.

May 4 - 10:38 AM

Andrew Brinkerhoff

Andrew Brinkerhoff

I was really hoping "Iron Man 3" would get a better rating than 78%, but I'll take what I can get. Seeing it tomorrow!

May 2 - 05:33 PM

Alex Irish

Alex Irish

IM3 started in the 90s, then went to 86. Now it's a 79. What the hell happened?

May 2 - 05:36 PM

Brad and Netflix

Bradly Martin

It's actually VERY HIGH for a part 3. Look at Terminator 3 or Pirates At Worlds End. A 78% is fantastic for a part 3 especially considering how BLAH Iron Man 2 was.

May 3 - 06:27 PM

Lavia Tesser

Lavia Tesser

Spiderman 3 is another example. The first film is 89%, the second is 93%, and the third is a mere 63%.

May 3 - 08:43 PM

Brad and Netflix

Bradly Martin

Right you are Lavia! I did think of one exception in Toy Story 3. I also really Liked The Dark Knight Rises but if we are going by a drop in quality it kind of isn't so much an exception.

May 4 - 07:54 PM

King  S.

King Simba

There actually are a lot of examples of the third film being considered as good as or better than the first two. The Bourne Ultimatum, The Good the Bad and the Ugly, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Return of the King, Goldfinger, etc. However, it seems to be a big problem with superheroe movies. Up until The Dark Knight Rises, there wasn't a single part 3 superhero movie that didn't show a big drop in quality from the previous two (and even TDKR is considered something a dissapointment, though personally I think part of the problem had to do with far too high expectations), while we've yet to have a part 3 that is considered the best of the franchise.

May 5 - 02:40 AM

Oliptius Shri

Oliptius Shri

What the heck happened, it was in the 90's with a little under 100 reviews last time I checked.

May 2 - 05:39 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I've been waiting on "Apres Mai" and "Post Tenebras Lux" since Cannes in 2012, so those are definites for me, when I can. "Iceman" is the one I will keep an eye out for in the short term.

May 2 - 05:41 PM

Sean D.

Sean D

I have wanted to see The Iceman too. Only because Michael Shannon playing a hitman cannot be at all bad.

May 2 - 06:53 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

"The Missing Person" is pretty good, mostly for Shannon himself. If you're more adventurous, try his Herzog film "My Son, My Son What Have Ye Done". Wild stuff.

May 2 - 07:00 PM

Sean D.

Sean D

And it is produced by David Lynch... and I love me some Lynch.

May 5 - 06:41 PM

Typhon

Typhon Q

I doubt that Iron Man 3's freshness is much of a factor for most people.

May 2 - 05:41 PM

Alberto Zeeky

Alberto Zeeky

Note to RT, wait before you make your consensus.

May 2 - 05:53 PM

This comment has been removed.

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

"Love". Dude, they collate reviews. That's all of the consensus they offer. Maybe, shucks, think for yourself or something.

May 2 - 06:15 PM

Alberto Zeeky

Alberto Zeeky

I'm seeing it no matter what, but RT jumped the gun with their consensus that it was arguably the best marvel film and behold they had to change it come now, just saying maybe they should wait until the day before release or when most of the reviews have come in to classify it.

May 2 - 06:41 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I don't even really care to defend this film. I'm just pointing out that this is how the "consensus" works. Recently, there was a thread praising the 80s horror schlock "Terrorvision", which has a 0% tomatometer. It's just one of those things. Don't confuse the number (quantity) with the content (quality).

May 2 - 06:46 PM

Alan Smithee

Alan Smithee

@Janson: You obviously don't understand how the consensus "works."

May 2 - 06:48 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

At "ashamed director": You obviously place too much imprtance on what the RT consensus happens to be.

May 2 - 06:52 PM

Alan Smithee

Alan Smithee

Once again, my personal opinion and the critical consensus often do not align. However the entire point of this site is to compile the opinions of the critics into one consensus and meta-score. It's not supposed to be the "RT consensus", it's supposed to be the approximate consensus of the majority of the critics.

May 2 - 07:04 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I hear ya. But today's Critics Consensus page very rarely changes dramatically (or they make a game of it) and those few that do (the last "Borne" film comes to mind) are not missed. If you look at the number of "Iron Man" interview clips promoted here, it just shouldn't be that surprising. The Bottom Line: is that I've never seen a film, or not seen a film, based on the Tomatometer.

May 2 - 07:10 PM

Alan Smithee

Alan Smithee

Your "bottom line" has nothing to do with what I was trying to point out. The real bottom line is that it's their JOB to assess the consensus, and the only way to properly do that is to wait for the majority of reviews to come in. End of story.

May 2 - 07:32 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

My bottom line was: Chill. Grain of salt. You should understand by now that the "consensus" fluctuates during the few weeks before a film's release. How seriously you take it is up to you.

May 3 - 08:36 AM

Ryan Nolan

Ryan Nolan

Jason is totally missing the point...or he knows that he isn't on topic and is just trying to win the argument anyways....

May 3 - 09:01 AM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Who's Jason ;) People use the site for different reasons. I rarely pay attention to the RT scores. I like having dozens of different critics' reviews easily available to read. "Consensus" is kind of an illusion in the first place.

May 3 - 10:21 AM

Alan Smithee

Alan Smithee

Exactly. They love to jump on the consensus before it's even remotely leveled out. These types of blockbusters get hundreds of reviews, yet they can barely wait for forty or sometimes less even. Also I could have sworn the consensus said it was "one of Marvel's best" before and now it simply says it's "a strong addition to the Marvel canon."

May 2 - 06:17 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Yeah. Looking at you dude.

May 2 - 06:22 PM

Dave J

Dave J

That's why if users are really that excited and curious about a film that they should continue to keep an open mind because nothing is absolute, for I've seen many older films which ratings change over time! Film critic Roger Ebert once said that his original rating for "The Good The Bad And The Ugly" was 3 stars but over time gave it a four out of four!

May 3 - 12:36 PM

Gordon Franklin Terry Sr

Gordon Terry

I find Consensus a valuable tool. and use it in my decision to see movies; when a film like Texas Chainsaw 3D gets a 2 PERCENT for instance its still worth seeing (on a sliding scale)

May 3 - 05:34 AM

Valmordas

Val Mordas

True but I've also went to see 70-80% rating moves and found out I was one of the 20% who thought it sucked. While critics are hard on horror flicks, more than any other genre, I still feel anything below 50% probably isn't very good. Unfortunately few horrors have gotten over that hump lately.

May 3 - 11:41 PM

Fernando Lodo

Fernando Lodo

Why use 41 agaist humans and only against hundred aliens ?

May 2 - 05:55 PM

Gordon Franklin Terry Sr

Gordon Terry

Budgetary reasons . . . its supposed to be 100 humans on the outpost in space against 1000 extra-terrestrial aliens.

May 3 - 05:35 AM

Brad and Netflix

Bradly Martin

because in part 3 everything has to be tripled...in this case Iron Man Suits. Also to Sell toys. I was annoyed his One Suit in Iron Man and Iron Man 2 did more cool stuff than 41 different suits all working together....awwwwkward.

May 4 - 07:55 PM

Valmordas

Val Mordas

I fear this is more of the same. Iron Man 2 simply wasn't very good, but the critics rated it graciously. I want to see the movie but I'm reluctant because I have the sinking feeling it's more of the same mediocre bullshit.

May 2 - 06:32 PM

Jonathan Edward O.

Jon Owens

I would say its slightly better than 2.... But it's definitely more of the same

May 2 - 08:22 PM

King Crunk

King Crunk

Iron Man 2 is a really bad movie. I did not think much of it upon first seeing it, but after thinking about it in retrospect and then seeing it again, it really is the weakest of Marvel's self produced films, and possibly my least favorite superhero flick around due to how completely flat the whole thing falls. It is not terrible, just bland as hell and mediocre, which might be worse in some people's eyes.

May 2 - 09:07 PM

Alan Smithee

Alan Smithee

Doesn't every single Marvel flick (independent & co-produced) precisely fit the definition of bland? They all have the exact same sterile production. That's why they all fit together so seamlessly. I really fail to see how IM2 is any more mediocre than say, The Avengers, Thor, Captain America, & The Incredible Hulk.

I do agree that the first IM was a success largely impart to Downey's performance. Problem is the studio saw that as well and went: "Yo dawg, we heard you like Tony Stark so we had Tony Stark impersonate Tony Stark so you get twice the Tony Stark!" As long as he simmers down in IM3, it'll be an improvement.

May 3 - 01:27 AM

Chris C.

Chris Collins

Did you watch the Judge Dredd film this year? That's how you do a superhero. Clint Eastwood in funny hat shooting people dead. Ironman is a lot of airy-fairy gaying it up, with Stark mincing about as the oh-so edgy hero. The films lack bite, real excitement and tension. The Avengers was great if you're five and want to avoid any sort of real challenge. That stupid flying battleship being a vortex of suck, as well as the lame final battle.

May 3 - 03:28 AM

King Crunk

King Crunk

I thought The Avengers was a good film despite falling into the same framework as all the other Marvel films, like you mentioned. The formula is wearing thin, and I am not sure the novelty of having all the main heroes team up again in The Avengers 2 will save it from being just another superhero flick. The trailer for Thor 2 was incredibly unexciting.

May 3 - 04:27 PM

James B.

James Bradford

After being pleasantly surprised by the first Iron Man, part 2 was torture. Iron Maiden was more like it.

May 3 - 08:57 AM

Chris Chapin

Chris Chapin

Watched a pre-screening of this, and while I liked it cause i'm a huge action movie and marvel fan...it really let me down. It was much better than part 2, and the final fight scene is pretty intense, but it wasn't near the quality of film the original was.

Overall I'd give it a 6/10

May 2 - 06:39 PM

King Crunk

King Crunk

I think the first film succeeded because it felt new and fresh with Downey as a superhero playboy. Everything besides Downey and his good chemistry with Gwyneth Paltrow is pretty by the numbers for superhero flicks in it.

May 2 - 09:09 PM

Sean D.

Sean D

As long as it is better than Iron Man 2 I will be content.

May 2 - 06:54 PM

Jaxx Raxor

Adam Jones

When I saw the first full trailer for Iron Man 3, I thought that it looked better than Iron Man 2 but not as good as Iron Man or the Avengers. I am a bit suprised at the RT meter, it's lower than I thought (I assumed it would be around 82%-85%). This is still one of my must see movies for the movie summer season. I'm personally a lot more excited for Man of Steel, which looks very promising.

May 2 - 07:08 PM

Chris Knouf

Chris Knouf

I will have to say I was not impressed at all. Robert Downey his humor was dry. Blowing up all the mark 5 armor must mean some other actor is going to take over the part of Ironman.

May 2 - 08:02 PM

Jonathan Edward O.

Jon Owens

They spit in the face of the fans and the source material.... All because little old Shane Black didn't like one of the characters....I feel betrayed

May 2 - 08:20 PM

Dave J

Dave J

Shane Black's best film will always be the first "Lethal Weapon" movie which Donner directed!

May 3 - 12:38 PM

Craig Walker

Craig Walker

Same here. Disappointed.

May 4 - 07:00 AM

Brad and Netflix

Bradly Martin

I really liked The Extremis comic but Extremis in this was quite the silly mess. It heals you only when it Doesn't! It makes you a super bad ass only when it doesn't! It's a post 9/11 paranoia and post traumatic stress allegory for injured vetrans only when it isn't! Sheesh.

May 4 - 07:58 PM

King Crunk

King Crunk

Was hoping The Iceman would get better reviews, but I will still see it just for Shannon's performance. I can wait until Iron Man 3 hits the home market since I have not been too excited for it.

May 2 - 08:49 PM

What's Hot On RT

Total Recall
Total Recall

Movies Directed by Tyler Perry

Summer Movie Guide
Summer Movie Guide

Blockbuster news and reviews

The East Trailer
The East Trailer

Ellen Page in an intriguing new thriller

24 Frames
24 Frames

A gallery of classic books on film

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile