Sly Stallone Gets Political for "Rambo IV"
After bringing back "Rocky Balboa," Sylvester Stallone promises to resurrect his other trademark character in "Rambo IV." Vietnam War veteran John Rambo's experience was quite different than today's troops, and that's where Stallone sees drama.
"It's more like the veteran mentality of the Vietnam War with its juxtaposition today," he explained. "The soldiers today I think are vastly different. A different breed. I think they're a little bit more aware. The other guys are a bit more naïve, and they went head long into these crazy situations. Look at the death toll. 52,000 and by today's standards that's unbelievable. A quarter of a million suicides after that from people who were damaged by the war. It's just in his attitude and his demeanor that you know he's still quite distraught by what he's been though, but yet he can't escape it, damned if he does and he's damned if he doesn't."

Politically outspoken celebrity + upcoming movie release = next Governor of California?
Don't worry, Stallone will stop with the sequels after "Rambo." There won't be a "Tango and Cash 2." "That would be it, because Rambo is a character that I think was not fully expressed in the last one. It's a character I think that is completely out of sync with the way things are. He's so primitive and he's so broken, his spirit, that he lives this monastic life out on the jungle. I think it's an interesting character study. I haven't seen anything like it lately."

Most people only remember "Rambo III" as another action movie, but Stallone recalls the volatile political climate that destroyed his last sequel. "Even though Afghanistan was the downfall, it was Russia's Vietnam. What happened was it was about 10 days before the movie came out, Gorbachev comes over and basically kisses Nancy Reagan on the cheek and the Cold War, 50 years later, is over and now I'm the bad guy. It's true. 'Why are you a red baiter?' I said, 'Two weeks ago we were dropping bombs on these guys.' So any time you do a film that deals with a political subject, you don't know, even though I'm doing it again. It's extremely volatile."
"It's more like the veteran mentality of the Vietnam War with its juxtaposition today," he explained. "The soldiers today I think are vastly different. A different breed. I think they're a little bit more aware. The other guys are a bit more naïve, and they went head long into these crazy situations. Look at the death toll. 52,000 and by today's standards that's unbelievable. A quarter of a million suicides after that from people who were damaged by the war. It's just in his attitude and his demeanor that you know he's still quite distraught by what he's been though, but yet he can't escape it, damned if he does and he's damned if he doesn't."

Politically outspoken celebrity + upcoming movie release = next Governor of California?
Don't worry, Stallone will stop with the sequels after "Rambo." There won't be a "Tango and Cash 2." "That would be it, because Rambo is a character that I think was not fully expressed in the last one. It's a character I think that is completely out of sync with the way things are. He's so primitive and he's so broken, his spirit, that he lives this monastic life out on the jungle. I think it's an interesting character study. I haven't seen anything like it lately."

Most people only remember "Rambo III" as another action movie, but Stallone recalls the volatile political climate that destroyed his last sequel. "Even though Afghanistan was the downfall, it was Russia's Vietnam. What happened was it was about 10 days before the movie came out, Gorbachev comes over and basically kisses Nancy Reagan on the cheek and the Cold War, 50 years later, is over and now I'm the bad guy. It's true. 'Why are you a red baiter?' I said, 'Two weeks ago we were dropping bombs on these guys.' So any time you do a film that deals with a political subject, you don't know, even though I'm doing it again. It's extremely volatile."
Related Items
| Movie: | Rambo III |
| Rambo - First Blood Pt. 2 | |
| First Blood | |
| Celeb: | Sylvester Stallone |
|
GreenBastard writes: on Dec 15 2006 09:52 PM I'm up for it! (Reply to this) |
|
Parenti writes: on Dec 15 2006 09:58 PM Maybe his buddies in Al-Quaida will be in this one as well. (Reply to this) |
|
JackHorner1979 writes: on Dec 16 2006 06:52 AM [b]Why doesn't Rambo fight the...[/b] leading proponent of terrorism? If he really wants to get political, have Rambo destroy the US government. (Reply to this) |
|
BuckRogers writes: on Dec 16 2006 07:17 AM [b]CIA[/b] is going to fuck you for say that, you can't say that if you are an American citizen? But i agree you're concept would make for a very entertaining moving. Has there ever been a movie about that?...apart from independence day (which sucked) (Reply to this) |
|
poedude99 writes: on Dec 17 2006 08:44 AM rambo does "destroy the us govt" at the end of Rambo: First Blood Two... remember him shooting up all the CIA equipment?.... Rambo hated the way they screwed him... remember: I'm comin for you, Murdoch? Rambo didn't give a sh** about getting out of that Cong Camp when they were torturing him... all he cared about was kicking CIA Op Murdoch's ass..... I'm coming for you, Murdoch... Rambo III just sucked.. the sin was going to Russian as enemy well one too many times... that theme was properly explored in Rambo: First Blood Two... www.savagerun.com (Reply to this) |
|
gbwillner writes: on Dec 19 2006 11:43 AM [b]YESSSSS!!!![/b] This will be great.... Rambo will have to kill all his buddies from Rambo III, who are now all Taliban fighters. Then he'll fly over to Vietnam and re-unite with his old torturers, who now run Vietnamese reputable businesses and want US trade. He'll be a respresentative for the US companies willing to invest. Then he'll fly over to Moscow and buy himself a couple of wives. (Reply to this) |
|
ArrowDawg writes: on Feb 07 2007 12:03 AM In reply to this comment (#851239) Only a bastard traitor would want his own government destroyed. Like the current administration or not, no real American wants his/her own government attacked. I can't believe you typed that. Oh, and for those of you far left-wingers reading this, I'm no Bush supporter. However, for any person to place blame on him for the mess that started all of the current problems(9/11/01), you have to be one crazy person. The man was in office only 8 months when an attack that took years to plan happened. This country as a whole let down its guard, but no one person is to blame. Middle East fascists have hated this country for a long, long time, and we paid for it by ignoring them. We had every right to fire back in Afghanistan, but we should have stopped there and concentrated on that area. Instead, Bush saw it as an opportunity to go into Iraq and get back at Saddam for trying to kill daddy. (Reply to this) |
|
J0N0 writes: on Sep 24 2007 11:25 AM I think it looks pretty cool. And who says you can't say what you like about the U.S. Government? I'm pretty sure there is no anti-Government bashing clause in your consitutuion. Americans still refer to the constitution don't they? (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |



