Correct me if I'm wrong, but the child is going to become the Rainmaker (which sounds just like the biblical prophecy of the Antichrist who will lead to the end of humanity) Why did Levitt's character sacrifice himself to save the child's life? Levitt killed himself so the evil leader can grow up and screw up the world?
Also, wasn't that sex scene the most forced sex scene ever? They was no romance between them and all the suddenly, she is coming on to him. It was awkward ...
Craig Arbogast
In the original timeline, Joseph Gordon-Levitt killed Bruce Willis and lived unhappily ever after. Bruce Willis never killed the mother. In the skewed time line, Joseph Gordon-Levitt killed himself and ipso facto Bruce Willis disappeared. Bruce Willis never killed the mother. The rain maker will happen anyway. The entire plot line is garbage. The main character changed nothing. He merely ensured the continuation of the nearly original timeline which means that the rain maker will still be in the future. The answer is yes. His character did drop the ball. Or more to the point, the writers dropped the ball. Levitt merely read the script.
May 5 - 07:05 PM