Steven Spielberg should be on this list. Over Woody Allen. Spielberg's War Horse was amazing, every single aspect of it. Allen's films are all almost the same thing over and over....
Jan 9 - 10:40 PM
fincher overrated; no malick is a crime
Jan 9 - 10:59 PM
Jan 10 - 12:14 AM
couldn't agree more
Jan 10 - 02:50 AM
Yeah, he should have just made The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo 2 hours of The Oceans 11 Cast playing beach volleyball with the cast of Rushmore and mystic river on the Swedish tundra culminating in a cameo from Adrian Brody accidentally crushing a newborn seal while trying to dig out one of Sean Penn's spikes and just staring off into space for the last 15 minutes of the film like Malick would have done. **in his haughtiest voice** "So courageous"
Jan 12 - 05:53 AM
They're either facebook users or fans of Zuckerburg himself!
Jan 13 - 12:05 PM
You misunderstand me. You SHOULD judge "Tree of Life" - by seeing it.
ahhh....no love for Nicolas Winding Refn...???
and Terrence Malick...???
david fincher was overrated.....
Jan 10 - 02:27 AM
Terrence Mallick, Nicholas Windin Refn, Bennet Miller, all SNUBBED? Are these guys crazy or what? they should nominate atleast 1 of da above. but still good 2 see David Fincher :)
Jan 10 - 02:31 AM
Why not? They gave Scorcese the Oscar for The Departed when it was a dodgy remake. He DID NOT deserve it that year.
Scorese may not have deserved to win, but he should've won for "Goodfellas" and it went to Dances With Wolves instead. Sometimes when someone should've won the year before can sometimes win after- so who knows what that person really won it for!
Jan 10 - 12:02 PM
While "Departed" is not Scorsese's best, or even the truly best film of 2006 (I'd go with Nolan's "Prestige" or - surprise! - Malick's "New World"), I wouldn't call it "dodgy". It's still a very impressive film about duplicity.
Jan 10 - 12:49 PM
the prestige was overrated; the twist was obvious and could be seen a mile away
Feb 1 - 08:54 AM
Was it? One question. Twin or Tesla? Regardless, it was a excellent production, Rain Man.
Feb 1 - 11:25 AM
Save Colin Firth's performance, which I did think was quite extraordinary, I agree with you. TKS had a very Star Wars ending. Everyone nodding in approval at eachother after the speech. Quite ludicrous, really. It's highlights are Firth & Rush, that's all.
Jan 10 - 02:58 AM
Agreed, if not Refn or Fincher, I'm rooting for Payne.
Jan 10 - 02:59 AM
all good noms
Jan 10 - 07:17 AM
If he was he got the lame, pasty version of it and not the badass cyberhacker version Lisbeth Salander got, oddly enough both got really rich off of it. Fictional Aspergers kicks ass, gotta get me some of that.
Jan 10 - 08:19 AM
Janson, no matter how much you defend Tree of Life, you cannot deny the existence of a plot anywhere in the film. Watching it in Blu-ray, while gorgeous, is very hard to understand what the characters are saying, and, or, where the film is actually going. Directors are supposed to direct us. Directing the viewer into a series of shots where people stare aimlessly in the sky isn't directing, it's a music video.
Jan 10 - 09:27 AM
I've posted before that "Tree" does not have a narrative plot, so that those who find that unappealing should avoid it. But I'd argue that doesn't make it "pointless", just as I'd argue that we need more "odd" films. (I love Lynch, too!) "Tree"'s point and direction is a sequence of emotional themes rather than linear events. It's more of a poem than a story. I'll let that description stand, as the reader's reaction to it should be as helpful as any other description as to whether or not they'll have the tolerance for this kind of film. If that sounds like 'artsy-fartsy' pretension, then I'd say 'skip it'. If it sounds at all intriguing, then give it a chance.
Jan 10 - 12:43 PM
Damnit Janson, you always know what to say.
If you admit it's not necessarily a film but rather a poem then I would have to side with you. It is very, different. It's completely odd and out there. I just feel like there are still many ways to tell a story without having to completely change the way films are made. Which is what Mallick tried to do, some people enjoyed it, you, and most didn't.
Jan 10 - 01:43 PM
you can say what you want about the films merits it still comes down to who is stroking who's ego......and Malick has always been an outsider
Jan 10 - 02:16 PM
He has 'virgin lips', so to speak.
Jan 10 - 03:36 PM
I think a tie between Woody Allen and David Fincher would be fabulous.
Jan 10 - 11:07 AM
If Zuckerburg has aspbergers then I don't see how is that relevent to the movie since he didn't really break any laws enough for him to get himself arrested on anything!
Jan 10 - 11:48 AM
Actually, The King's Speech is an old man's movie which is why it won over the Social Network- there were more older voters who still don't know what a computer let alone how to operate one which is why the voters didn't see it's significance!
Jan 10 - 11:56 AM
I liked Toy Story 3 more than The Social Network as well. For the Record.
Jan 10 - 01:23 PM
It's okay to enjoy Toy Story 3 than the Social Network most young adults have, but what about in terms of it's importance and it's relevance! How important is Toy Story 3 as opposed to the other nominations!
Jan 10 - 01:38 PM
Which raises another question, is Tom Hooper going to direct another film since Fincher is a movie veteran of sorts!
Jan 10 - 11:57 AM
didnt quite understand your comment, but in case you were wondering , Mr Holland is directing Les Mis , I believe...
Jan 10 - 02:07 PM
I was just pointing out that Fincher's notoriety is quite well known here as opposed to anything coming out of Tom Hooper! Perhaps I should've word it better!
Jan 10 - 02:13 PM
Your tax dollars at work, in movies.
Picture gallery of movie bears
10 most anticipated blockbusters
Read reviews for Season 7 premiere