Just in time for Thanksgiving, we're getting a horror film to be thankful
for. Reuniting the dynamic duo of author
Stephen King and director
Frank Darabont (The Shawshank
Redemption, The Green Mile),
The Mist is a jump-out-of-your-seat horror flick that explores the monsters that humans become when engulfed by fear.
Thomas Jane,
Marcia Gay Harden, and Chris "The Sherminator" Owen are
among a band of survivors trapped in a grocery store, surrounded by a
supernatural fog and an assortment of vicious bugs and monsters.
RT caught up with Darabont and his three cast members during a roundtable chat (memorably interrupted by Thomas Jane's room service delivery) to discuss what humans are capable of under duress, Stephen King and Frank Darabont's working relationship, and how The Idiot's Guide to Revelations helped Marcia Gay Harden prepare for her role.
The Mist enters theaters everywhere this Wednesday.Frank, what made you want to get behind the camera?
Frank Darabont: For 20 years of a career I've been primarily a writer for
hire. I've been a screenwriter first and a director on occasion. It's only been
quite recently that I decided to reverse that equation and get behind the camera
as often as I could. I'm not getting any younger and I feel like I've got some
more movies to make.
Why another Stephen King adaptation?
FD: In all fairness, I think I have a particular love for the man's work. His voice as an author tends to attract me as a director. I find the stories that he tells are extremely compelling, so it seems to be a well that I keep going back to draw water from again and again. Luckily he digs what I do. It seems like a pretty good companionship there in terms of material and director.
Marcia, do you find it rare that scripts come along that you get excited about?
Marcia Gay Harden: For me, it's about character. What's the character arc? What can I do with the character? But not too many come along that you get excited about. They are few and far between.

Thomas Jane and Marcia Gay Harden with other survivors.
What drew you to The Mist script?
MGH: Frank Darabont. I love his work and I love that he tells a really human story. Often humans are far scarier than exterior events. In this case, I thought that Frank told a beautiful story. I like Stephen King, but I wasn't one of the die-hard fans. So while I want to say it was Stephen that drew me to it, it was the knowledge of the way [Darabont] tells a story. It's not the typical thing I curl up on the couch to read, so it was Frank doing a Stephen King story that made it even bigger.
[Mist co-star] Andre Braugher and I spoke at length about the script. My thought at first was, "It's a bug movie, what is that going to be like?" I spoke to Frank about that too and he really spoke about the internal machinations in the store that has a Lord of the Flies feel, which was the most terrifying book I ever read as a kid; the capacity for human beings to be cruel and their ignorance is as scary as supernatural forces.
Chris Owen: For me it was Frank, too. I'm such a fanboy and when people ask me what my favorite film is, it's always Shawshank. For me, getting to work with Frank was something I could scratch off my list. It was so much fun.
How did you prepare to play such an apocalyptic character?
MGH: It was fantastic to play this lady. I bought this book called The Idiot's Guide to Revelations because a lot of her speak is "Bible speak." I wanted it to be as real as it could be, so that when I talked about the Four Horsemen, I could be real with it.
And how did you approach carrying so much of the Mist's suspense and drama?
MGH: I embraced fear. I didn't want to let on at the beginning that she would be trouble, so Frank and I worked on creating a person that was less visually obvious than what had been written. We tried to create someone who might blend in with the "normal folk." Nor did I want to blame her for the fact that she thought it was the end of the world -- because there's bugs the size of skyscrapers coming out to eat people. I think if I saw that, I might think that it was the end of the world. It's not that far fetched. I didn't want it to be her religion, I wanted it to be more the degree to which she takes the religion and is capable of doing such human acts of cruelty that defies any logic. She creates a mob mentality, and the mob is a very scary thing, so then the mob takes on the responsibility of that fear. Then it's in the hands of Frank and how he comes in on a shot, and how he films my face, or when he cuts to someone looking at me. Those are the things, regardless of what I do, [that] up the ante, because he's the one building the tension every step of the way.
|
AlbertBrodsky writes: on Nov 20 2007 01:00 PM I think this movie will open number one followed by Beowolf at a close second. Enchanted third followed by No Country. Bee Movie will fall to fifth. (Reply to this) |
|
BuckyUnderbelly writes: on Nov 20 2007 01:25 PM Now I want a hamburger. (Reply to this) |
|
Nick Hershey writes: on Nov 20 2007 01:31 PM In reply to this comment (#1292048) Just try to make sure you're not in the middle of an interview when you eat it. (Reply to this) |
|
Sideshowcecil writes: on Nov 20 2007 02:03 PM Kudos to Thomas Jane for making HIMSELF out to be a douche-bag. Let's leave the philosophical questions to the bouncers, boys. (Reply to this) |
|
HisNameIsFrank writes: on Nov 20 2007 05:22 PM The Mist has always been one of my favorite King stories. Hit or miss,I'm just glad it's in the very capable hands of Frank Darabont. I will definitely be seeing it this weekend. (Reply to this) |
|
Gimy writes: on Nov 21 2007 05:50 AM i actually liked 1408 even though it was INSANELY predictable. nothing scared, nor surprised me. but it was executed so well that it was a good flick. and no, i didn't read the book(i'm lazy). if this one is executed as well then i'll be happy. i just don't want another the Fog. lay off Jane, his parts made me laugh you don't know the context of his tone so you can't really say he's being a d3uche...maybe just a smart2ss. (Reply to this) |
|
wordweaver writes: on Nov 21 2007 09:43 AM Stephen King adaptations are made-for-TV movies or straight to DVD. Who releases a Stephen King adaptation on the big screen? that person must have a lot courage. Can I get a F-L-O-P? (Reply to this) |
|
No-Name writes: on Nov 22 2007 01:43 AM Nice interview. But the only smartasses or douche-bags that I see are here. (Reply to this) |
|
HisNameIsFrank writes: on Nov 22 2007 07:04 AM wordweaver writes: on Nov 21 2007 09:43 AM Stephen King adaptations are made-for-TV movies or straight to DVD. Who releases a Stephen King adaptation on the big screen? that person must have a lot courage. Can I get a F-L-O-P? ^^^^Yeah,man. I completely agree. There has never been a sucessful movie based on a story by Stephen King. Unless you count: The Shining Carrie Misery The Shawshank Redemption The Green Mile Stand By Me 1408 The Dead Zone I'll stop for now.......... (Reply to this) |
|
jeanpaul writes: on Nov 23 2007 05:23 AM Dammit, Thomas Jane!! Get back to portraying FRANK CASTLE for "Punisher 2", if you are at all interested in getting you carreer and your popularity back on track! Jane did a fine job portraying "Punisher"--- he should NOT listen to all the naysayers's buzz out there--- and keep doing something he did so well. I don't know what idiot is Jane's agent: but if that agent has a cell of good brain in his/her head-- he/she should advice Thomas to do "Punisher 2"! (Reply to this) |
|
Jrose357 writes: on Nov 23 2007 01:06 PM So so acting with some good idea, suspense, and graphics got ruined by the ending (Reply to this) |
|
excusetheavatar writes: on Nov 23 2007 05:21 PM "Thomas Jane still in the mist" LOL (Reply to this) |
|
peterius writes: on Nov 24 2007 01:31 PM In reply to this comment (#1293445) 1408 was completely indistinguishable from the trailer. I'm thinking this movie has a lot of... mist in it. (Reply to this) |
|
jmbky1 writes: on Nov 25 2007 08:33 PM Thomas Jane seems like a real *******. Asking why audiences see horror movies is not a philosophical question in the least. We don't think Thomas is smart enough to answer those questions. (Reply to this) |
|
Kudama writes: on Nov 26 2007 08:40 AM Thomas Jane brought the funny. Sometimes these questions just get old. Like the obligitory "What was it like spending so much time in make-up?" or " What was it like acting in front of a green screen and not being able to see your co-actors/the creatures?" Then you get the canned answer you've heard a million times. He kept it real. Good for him. You'll notice he responded openly to the relatively new question regarding the documentary style film making. (Reply to this) |
|
Kudama writes: on Nov 26 2007 08:42 AM Thomas Jane brought the funny. Sometimes these questions just get old. Like the obligitory "What was it like spending so much time in make-up?" or " What was it like acting in front of a green screen and not being able to see your co-actors/the creatures?" Then you get the canned answer you've heard a million times. He kept it real. Good for him. You'll notice he responded openly to the relatively new question regarding the documentary style film making. (Reply to this) |
|
vaodsi writes: on Nov 26 2007 05:42 PM I hated that ending. i walked out before the credits even started. People were booing and flipping off the screen. What the heck were they thinking. LAME!!!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
frogleg writes: on Nov 30 2007 07:04 AM I thought the ending was the best part of the movie. I was shocked at how grim it was. I've read the book, and I didn't remember the ending. I liked the Mist quite a lot. The creature design was great, but the execution on the CGI was really cartoony. That's the only thing that was kind of lacking, IMO. (Reply to this) |
|
HisNameIsFrank writes: on Dec 02 2007 12:45 PM [QUOTE] I thought the ending was the best part of the movie. I was shocked at how grim it was. I've read the book, and I didn't remember the ending. I liked the Mist quite a lot. The creature design was great, but the execution on the CGI was really cartoony. That's the only thing that was kind of lacking, IMO. The ending of the movie and book are different. In the book,they kept driving,realizing that there was no end to the mist. I liked this ending much better. I'm so tired of happy,tacked on Hollywood endings. This ending was a spit in the face of everyone who wants to see everything wrapped up in a nice,shiny little package. The world is full of ****ed-up little ironies that happen to us everyday. Art is even better when it truely imitates life. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |








