For all the movie's technical meticulousness, the storytelling still has a wiggly-waggly quality, like a dangly loose tooth.
Shouldn't a 6.5/10 be considered a positive review?
May 24 - 01:45 PM
Shouldn't it not matter, this film was friggen amazing who cares what people say, don't let it get you down Ezra, your a good person, a tomatometer is a pretty useless thing
May 24 - 01:47 PM
Sounds like something The Dude would say, man
May 25 - 10:16 PM
how dare you sir
May 24 - 02:21 PM
I checked her recent rating history 6.5 is generally fresh (with a couple of rottens) however she had a couple of movies that she gave 6.0 which were fresh. Maybe RT assigns her Fresh/Rotten based on their impression of the review rather than her actual scores.
May 24 - 03:00 PM
I don't know what this means.
May 24 - 06:01 PM
76 reviews & three idiots I have never heard of - - are the only negative reviews? Are you a real critic... or are you a caricature like your picture
May 25 - 09:48 AM
Yet again (Loder and Maltin previous), another critic that didn't like this movie because they don't like Anderson's style.
May 26 - 06:36 PM
If you call vapid pretentiousness a "style."
Jun 4 - 11:26 PM
One of 9 idiots who just don't get it...
Jul 2 - 06:59 PM