Critics are comparing the third installment of the Mummy series, Tomb of the Dragon Emperor, to an Egyptian burial shrine -- not because it contains visual opulence, but because it's more than a little musty. Brendan Fraser returns as Rick, an intrepid explorer whose latest mission finds him in Asia, where he has to contend with an army of terra cotta warriors led by an ancient emperor (Jet Li). Let's face it: the appeal of Mummy movies was their B-movie swashbuckling, not emotional heft or serious thematic resonance. But pundits say Tomb fails even at that modest level, featuring soulless CG effects, a notable lack of energy from the cast, and an overall lack of fun. At 11 percent on the Tomatometer, The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor is easily the worst-reviewed entry in a series the critics say is probably ready for embalming. It's also one of the worst-reviewed films of the year. (Check out this week's Total Recall, in which we provide an overview of Jet Li's best-reviewed films.)
Turns out Jet Li is the center of the universe.
We've seen some recent national elections come down to a few hundred votes, but what if the presidency was decided by a single ballot? It's an inspired premise, one that critics say unfortunately pays only intermittent dividends in Swing Vote. Kevin Costner stars as Bud Johnson, an amiable, slothful average Joe who, through a technical error, becomes the deciding vote in a presidential election; as a result, he's heavily courted by the candidates while trying to do right by his daughter. The pundits say Swing Vote has moments of gentle charm, but it's too predictable and lacks the sharp bite required to make it truly successful satire. At 37 percent on the Tomatometer, a recount isn't going to save Swing Vote.
"Don't ever get drunk and go on eBay again!"
Also opening this week in limited release:
-
In Search of a Midnight Kiss, an indie comedy about a lonely guy looking for a smooch on New Year's Eve, is at 89 percent.
-
America the Beautiful, a documentary about how the fashion industry negatively contributes to Americans' obsession with their looks, is at 80 percent.
-
Frozen River, an indie drama about how a woman's desperate search for her husband gets her involved in the trafficking of illegal immigrants, is at 78 percent.
-
Profit Motive and the Whispering Wind, a doc that poetically examines the gravesites of a variety of important historical figures, is at 80 percent.
-
The Helena Bonham-Carter-toplined Sixty Six, a British coming-of-age comedy about a boy who's torn between attending his Bar Mitzvah and watching the World Cup, is at 60 percent.
His attempts at water polo were less successful.
Recent Kevin Costner Movies:
--------------------------------------
56% -- Mr. Brooks (2007)
-
37% -- The Guardian (2006)
-
19% -- Rumor Has It... (2005)
-
50% -- Ever Again (2005)
-
74% -- The Upside of Anger (2005)
-
56% -- Mr. Brooks (2007)
Related Items
| Movie: | Swing Vote |
| Kenny | |
| In Search of a Midnight Kiss | |
| Frozen River | |
| Stealing America: Vote By Vote | |
| Profit Motive and the Whispering Wind | |
| Sixty Six | |
| Celeb: | Kevin Costner |
| Jet Li |
|
dylan21484nj writes: on Jul 31 2008 05:15 PM so, does this mean The Dark Knight will once again top the weekend box office? (Reply to this) |
|
sunsaz writes: on Jul 31 2008 05:25 PM In reply to this comment (#1941096) These reviews don't guarentee a three-peat for TDK, but it certainly improves its chances. (Reply to this) |
|
scarletsmith writes: on Jul 31 2008 05:28 PM Heck, I don't see anything coming down the pike until [b]Tropic Thunder[/b] that will take away [b]TDK[/b]'s box office reign. I may have questioned it previously, but it now looks like WB's insistence on holding [b]TDK[/b] until late July is now paying dividends a plenty. (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Jul 31 2008 08:33 PM Im still going to see the Mummy 3, Ebert says if you liked the first one you will like this one. (Reply to this) |
|
TragicVillain writes: on Jul 31 2008 08:44 PM Ebert says....hahaha... Oh (Reply to this) |
|
Comment writes: on Jul 31 2008 09:46 PM My mum says I'm cool, so that means i am, right? (Reply to this) |
|
fullmetalnek writes: on Jul 31 2008 10:06 PM In reply to this comment (#1941747) If your mom has a pulitzer, then there's a good chance you are. (Reply to this) |
|
CoUcH ToMaToE DoUgIe writes: on Aug 01 2008 12:09 AM Poor Kevin Costner... will his career ever recover. it's always a shame to see this once great actor continue to falter with an endless flow of bad movies. Still, here's hoping it beats out the Mummy 3, which probably won't happen but hey it would be nice. Also, here's hoping the best movie of the years stays king of the box office for one more week, at least. Please, America, I plead with you , let another Apatow comedy gem replace the Dark Knight and not the Mummy 3!! (Reply to this) |
|
wordweaver12 writes: on Aug 01 2008 03:12 AM I hope the Mummy 3 BOMBS...and I mean BOMB!!! What the hell are these producers thinking? first of all, replacing Rachel Weisz with Maria Bello was just a dumb decision. They should have written off her character. Do they think fans have notice the difference? Second of all, there's no "Mummy" in "Mummy 3" which is "slightly" off because the name of the movie is called "The Mummy"...and then the Indiana Jones rip-off, the recycled CGI effects like having a dragon monster spitting fire (W T F?), the dull dialogue, the unfunny humor...HOLLYWOOD has gone MAD! If there's any justice in the world, this movie should TANK! Greedy producers trying to dodge creativity and ca$h in on old and recycled ideas should not be spared. SKIP IT! (Reply to this) |
|
MMacKK writes: on Aug 01 2008 03:27 AM Kevin Costner was never great. He's average at best. (Reply to this) |
|
thereign writes: on Aug 01 2008 04:44 AM Saw Mummy 3. It pretty much sucked. Bello was a poor choice to replace Weisz, effects are so-so, the storyline is weak as hell, and just bad decisions all around in regards to crafting this tale. I'm going to go see Dark Knight again as soon as possible to wash Mummy 3 out of my brain. (Reply to this) |
|
martinscorsese25 writes: on Aug 01 2008 05:18 AM In reply to this comment (#1941444) thats because ebert has a weakness for this kinds of films about archeaology... he admits it in one of the episodes (Reply to this) |
|
Gimy writes: on Aug 01 2008 05:48 AM i'm going to see the Mummy, who cares what critics supposedly think. that actually makes me believe its going to be awesome considering how crappy their opinions have been in recent years. same folks who thought Indy was good right? yeah, hoooook. talk about soullness cgi, bad writing, bad acting, horrible dialogue...and ruining a series cuz of $. i'm guessing it'll be somewhere between the first one and the second in terms of entertaining. as long as the cgi isn't as bad as the second, and its not as dumb as the scorpion king...its all good. swing vote...just, speechless. 4 years ago...woulda been better. better, not good. just looks like a total borefest. (Reply to this) |
|
spuke4000 writes: on Aug 01 2008 06:25 AM If you are going to pan the movie that's one thing, but at least get his name right. It's Brendan Fraser, not Frasier. He's not a radio psychiatrist. (Reply to this) |
|
collex writes: on Aug 01 2008 06:48 AM I wasn't really psyched for the Mummy. I absolutely loved the first and second movie. There were some of the finest adventure movie I've seen (after Indiana Jones of course!). Me too I have a soft point for movie about archeology (dcan you really call that a weakness?) But I don't know, changing one of the lead actor always spell doom, and it doesn't feel really like The Mummy anymore, from the trailer anyway. (Long Live Imhothep!!!) I will probably see it anyway, but not in theaters. (There is no theater were I am this summer, and when I get back home, the first movie I'm going to see is TDK!) (Reply to this) |
|
HyperionChild writes: on Aug 01 2008 06:58 AM If Hollywood really wanted to make a political movie about one man deciding a U.S. Presidential Election, it would have to star Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, not Kevin Costner. (Reply to this) |
|
SubmarineChannel writes: on Aug 01 2008 07:31 AM The end credits are very htt (Reply to this) |
|
sunsaz writes: on Aug 01 2008 07:55 AM In reply to this comment (#1942261) Somewhat agree. He's good when he's got a solid cast to work with (Bull Durham, Field of Dreams, Untouchables), but tends to linger when he's forced to carry the movie (Dances With Wolves, Postman). I still need to see "Thirteen Days" and "For Love of the Game" though. (Reply to this) |
|
dystopiandweller writes: on Aug 01 2008 11:16 AM In reply to this comment (#1942690) haha, yes indeed. (Reply to this) |
|
astrangefish writes: on Aug 01 2008 11:18 AM In reply to this comment (#1942917) 'Thirteen Days' is v.good, works well as companion piece/prequel to 'JFK'. Haven't seen 'For The Love Of The Game', but been told 'Wyatt Earp' one of his best, anyone know?. 'Indy IV' was awful, and that was a sequeling good films - so 'Mummy 3' no chance. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |







