Click to read the article
The Mysteries of Pittsburgh (2009)
Tomatometer
How does the Tomatometer work ![]()
Reviews Counted: 35
Fresh: 5
Rotten:30
Average Rating: 4/10
Consensus: A listless interpretation of Michael Chabon's first novel, Mysteries of Pittsburgh features none of the source material's charm, but has coming-of-age film cliches in abundance.
Rated: R [See Full Rating] for strong sexuality, nudity and language
Runtime: 1 hr 35 mins
Genre: Dramas
Theatrical Release:Apr 10, 2009 Limited
Box Office: $32,783
Synopsis: Adapting a subtle, treasured novel is no enviable task. Yet it's that admittedly mammoth undertaking that is at the core of the success or failure of THE MYSTERIES OF PITTSBURGH, director Rawson... Adapting a subtle, treasured novel is no enviable task. Yet it's that admittedly mammoth undertaking that is at the core of the success or failure of THE MYSTERIES OF PITTSBURGH, director Rawson Marshall Thurber's film version of Michael Chabon's debut novel. As a book, MYSTERIES masterfully builds upon the rich tradition of coming-of-age novels through a combination of unique characters, a simple yet intriguing plot, and a quiet celebration of the hidden delights (the "mysteries," if you will) of a small city. Thurber, who also wrote the screenplay, takes huge liberties in reworking the source material--the story of Art Bechstein (Jon Foster), the son of a known gangster, and his conflicting love for two of his bohemian friends (one a woman, the other a man) in the summer following his college graduation--and in the process creates a film that is a mere shadow of the novel on which it was based. Working with a varied cast of novice and more experienced actors (Sienna Miller, Mena Suvan, Nick Nolte, Peter Sarsgaard), Thurber does his best to recreate the melancholic wonder of falling in love, grappling with the expectations of family, and adjusting to one's adult skin, yet Chabon's novel is perhaps too nuanced to lend itself to an easy big-screen transition. That's not to say that Thurber's effort is not gallant and in its own way charming; rather, film is film, literature is literature, and, more often than not, never the twain shall meet. [More]
Starring: Jon Foster, Peter Sarsgaard, Sienna Miller, Nick Nolte
Starring: Jon Foster, Peter Sarsgaard, Sienna Miller, Nick Nolte, Mena Suvari
Director: Rawson Marshall Thurber
Director: Rawson Marshall Thurber
Screenwriter: Rawson Marshall Thurber
Producer: Michael London, Jason Mercer
Composer: Theodore Shapiro
Studio: Peace Arch Entertainment
Reviews for The Mysteries of Pittsburgh
Michael Barrett's cinematography gives the film and the city of Pittsburgh just enough of a picturesque dream-like quality that, like its protagonist, you'll remember.
[Art] is as passive as Benjamin Button minus the freak-of-nature excuse.
Shoddy and never credible, The Mysteries of Pittsburgh is an ungainly coming-of-age drama based on a (hopefully much better) novel by Pulitzer Prize-winning author Michael Chabon.
The Mysteries of Pittsburgh seems to be missing an essential element of drama, of risk, underneath its glossy, golden sheen.
Somehow, even as writer-director Rawson Marshall Thurber slathers on the voiceover ooze or unwittingly evokes Sophie’s Choice with his central romantic triangle, he still manages to astonish with The Mysteries of Pittsburgh.
I can’t imagine the novel’s characters were this flat, formulaic and puzzling in their behavior.
Sarsgaard revels in a character who attracts all eyes and mouths, but the narration is too much of an explanatory crutch to parse the roundelay of identity exploration.
The real mystery about The Mysteries of Pittsburgh is how writer-director Rawson Marshall Thurber could turn Michael Chabon's delightful debut novel into such a bore.
Here's the big mystery of Pittsburgh: How did this movie manage to be so completely terrible?
When characters say things like "It’s gonna be a great summer," or call someone "Old sport" and act oh-so-beautifully doomed, it’s time to call the cliché police.
A misguided head-spinner of conflicting tones, listless lead performances and dashed expectations.
When a director has an overinflated conception of the adapted book, we stand a pretty good chance of being really underwhelmed by the completed movie.
The charm and drily pointed cultural observations that made Chabon's 1988 debut so auspicious are largely missing in action throughout this earnest but unconvincing film.
Sarsgaard is the only interesting element, but he doesn't make the movie worth seeing.
Only Sarsgaard shows a pulse, creating a self-destructive, omnisexual rogue who, for all his faults, would probably be great company. The same can’t be said for the film around him.
At any middling arthouse festival, films like this are four for a dollar.
Latest News for The Mysteries of Pittsburgh
April 19, 2009:
Trailer & Poster review ![]()
More...
April 09, 2009:
Critics Consensus: Hannah Montana Hits A Flat Note
This week at the movies, we've got a pop songbird (Hannah Montana the Movie, starring Miley and Billy Ray Cyrus), a mall cop (Observe and Report, starring Seth Rogen and Anna... More...
Related Forums for The Mysteries of Pittsburgh
| Tomatometer Percentage | Movie | Date |
|---|---|---|
96% 96% |
Harry Potter and the H… | 7/15 |
100% 100% |
500 Days of Summer | 7/17 |
|
G-Force | 7/24 |
|
The Ugly Truth | 7/24 |
|
Orphan | 7/24 |
RT On Current TV
What’s Hot On RT
Other News
Sponsored Links
Around The Network
- The Mysteries of Pittsburgh at Rotten Tomatoes
Fresh Links
Featured

MSN's David Fear and Frank Paiva go head to head discussing the pros and cons of Bruno star Sacha Baron Cohen.

The AV Club's Scott Tobias takes a second look at David Lynch's cult classic, Lost Highway.

TIME takes us on a 25-year long journey into the superstar's career, giving us a look at his 10 best roles.

BuzzSugar reports on Paramount's plans to rebirth the iconic TV show as a comedy film.



Top Critic

