RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News / Columns / Box Office
Box Office Guru Wrapup: Museum Terminates Salvation
Stiller beats Bale for the weekend's top ranking.
by Gitesh Pandya | May 25, 2009
Discuss Article

Fox won the holiday battle of the sequels as the adventure comedy Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian debuted at number one over the long Memorial Day frame easily outgunning its rival, the Warner Bros. sci-fi actioner Terminator Salvation, which opened in second place. Holdovers fared well as the Top 20 films pulled in $220M from 30 million tickets sold virtually matching last year's holiday weekend.

Moviegoers lined up for Ben Stiller who enjoyed the best live-action opening of his career with his second Night at the Museum film which collected a hefty $70M, according to estimates, over the Friday-to-Monday holiday session. The Fox sequel averaged a muscular $17,090 over four days from an ultrawide 4,096 locations including Imax venues with higher-priced tickets. The PG-rated film banked an impressive $53.5M over the Friday-to-Sunday period for a stellar $13,062 average.

Unlike Salvation, Smithsonian built upon the opening of its predecessor. In December 2006, the first Museum bowed to $42.2M over its four-day Christmas holiday debut on its way to a $250.9M domestic haul and sensational $574M global gross. Stiller, Robin Williams, Owen Wilson, and director Shawn Levy all returned for the new Washington DC-set installment while new faces included Amy Adams and Hank Azaria.

Fox is riding high this year as both of its summer sequels, Smithsonian and X-Men Origins: Wolverine, debuted at number one and are each likely to cross $175M. Add in the $140M+ grosses of the sleeper hit Taken, Christmas holdover Marley & Me, and Oscar champ Slumdog Millionaire from indie unit Fox Searchlight and the studio has delivered fantastic results at the box office over the past six months and hopes to keep the momentum going in 2009 with its third Ice Age toon over Independence Day weekend plus James Cameron's Avatar in mid-December and Alvin and the Chipmunks: the Squeakquel on Christmas Day.

Internationally, the new Night at the Museum invaded most major territories and grossed $50M over the weekend for a $120M global launch.

Coming in second for the long weekend was Terminator Salvation which grossed an estimated $53.8M over four days and $67.2M since its early launch on Thursday. Directed by McG, the Warner Bros. release averaged $15,248 from 3,530 locations. Over the Friday-to-Sunday span, Salvation grossed $43M averaging $12,184.

The debut was slightly disappointing considering the expanded holiday box office and the large fan base of the popular sci-fi franchise. The new installment's gross came in below the opening of the last film in the series, 2003's Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, which launched over the Fourth of July holiday weekend with an extended tally of $72.4M over its five-day Wednesday-to-Sunday opening. That take was boosted by Tuesday night previews starting at 8pm, but Friday sales were hampered by the Independence Day holiday which always cuts into moviegoing because of outdoor activities. The T3 figure would be about $88M at today's higher ticket prices putting Salvation a troubling 23% behind in admissions when comparing the extended holiday openings. Machines starred Arnold Schwarzenegger, was rated R, and set in present day while Salvation is headlined by Christian Bale, carries a PG-13, and is set in the year 2018.

For 2009, the Friday-to-Sunday figure does not measure up to many of the year's top grossers. Salvation only made it to number eight on the list of the year's biggest openers. In fact, the street racing sequel Fast & Furious grossed more in its first three days over a normal weekend ($71M) than Terminator Salvation did in its entire five-day extended holiday launch.

Reviews were mixed for the expensive new sci-fi sequel. The production budget is reported to be in the neighborhood of $200M with Warners paying $50M for domestic rights and Sony kicking in $75M for most foreign territories. The studios are also responsible for the enormous marketing costs.

Early fan buzz does not put the film in the same league as Star Trek or last summer's Iron Man and The Dark Knight so audience erosion in the weeks ahead should be quick as is often the case with action sequels. Last year's Memorial Day winner Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull debuted with a gargantuan $152M over a similar Thursday-to-Monday five-day period which ended up accounting for 48% of its $317.1M final. A year earlier, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End bowed to $153M over 4.5 days repping 49% of its eventual total. Salvation could follow a similar path to a domestic tally of $130-140M. T3 banked more with $150.4M in North America, or $182M at today's prices. A fifth Terminator pic with Bale starring once again is in development.

Posting another strong performance was the sci-fi smash Star Trek which took in an estimated $29.4M over the Friday-to-Monday span lifting the cume to a robust $191M after 18 days of release. The three-day portion stood at $22.8M for a 47% drop which was encouraging given the arrival of competing sci-fi franchise flick Terminator. Trek now looks set to finish its domestic run in the neighborhood of $250M making it the seventh biggest blockbuster in company history for Paramount. Unless Smithsonian has incredible legs, Kirk and company will remain the most popular summer smash for the time being. By Tuesday it will surpass studio stablemate Monsters vs. Aliens to become the top-grossing film of 2009. Trek's overseas tally to date has climbed to $87.5M putting the global gross at $278.5M.

The Vatican thriller Angels & Demons dropped from first to fourth place grossing an estimated $27.7M over four days boosting the domestic take to $87.8M after 11 days. Tom Hanks and Ron Howard took in $21.8M over the three-day span representing a steep 53% fall from the opening weekend. By comparison, 2006's The Da Vinci Code opened at the exact same time and fell by 56% in its sophomore session (also the Memorial Day holiday frame) for an 11-day cume of $144.9M. Angels is now running 39% behind the pace of Code. A final gross of $130-140M seems likely for North America. Overseas, the Robert Langdon pic was the top draw once again with $60.4M in ticket sales boosting the international haul to $198.3M and the worldwide total to $286M. Sony expects Angels to fly past the $300M global mark on Wednesday.

Paramount's spoof comedy Dance Flick bowed in fifth with an estimated $13.1M over four days. Debuting in 2,450 locations, the PG-13 pic averaged a respectable $5,347 per site. Dance was the first film from a new generation of Wayans with Damon Wayans Jr. in the lead and Damien Dante Wayans directing. Over the Friday-to-Sunday period the gross was $10.7M with a mild $4,381 average. The numbers did not match up to those delivered by family leader Keenan Ivory Wayans whose last two directorial efforts Little Man and White Chicks opened to $21.6M and $19.7M, respectively.

Dropping down to sixth place in its fourth weekend was the super hero prequel X-Men Origins: Wolverine with an estimated $10.1M. The three-day tally accounted for $8M, off 46% from last weekend, and Fox has collected $165.4M domestically to date. Add in the $156.7M from overseas markets and the mutant flick has banked a commendable $322M worldwide.

The romantic comedy Ghosts of Girlfriends Past settled into seventh place with an estimated $4.7M boosting the total to $46.8M for Warner Bros. Sony's hit thriller Obsessed followed with an estimated $2.4M which raised the total to $66.3M.

In its ninth weekend of collecting extra surcharges for its 3D presentation, the DreamWorks toon Monsters vs. Aliens remained in the top ten once again grossing an estimated $1.7M boosting the cume to $193.3M. The Paramount release is now the highest-grossing film released since last summer's colossal smash The Dark Knight surpassing the $191.5M of Twilight. Rounding out the top ten was the teen comedy 17 Again with an estimated $1.2M over the long weekend giving Warner Bros. $60.5M to date.

The top ten films grossed an estimated $214.6M over four days which was up 1% from last year when Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull opened in the top spot with $126.9M; but down 12% from 2007 when Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End debuted at number one with $139.8M.

Author: Gitesh Pandya

www.BoxOfficeGuru.com

Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-20 of 109 posts) | Reply
emoticant
emoticant writes:
on May 25 2009 09:29 PM

sad

(Reply to this)
tfortier
tfortier writes:
on May 25 2009 09:37 PM

Whats wrong with the tomatoe? 24 hours late to update the top 5 ranking which now look like

1- Night at the museum
2- Night at the museum
3 -Terminator

??


(Reply to this)
Sulaco2k
Sulaco2k writes:
on May 25 2009 09:39 PM

Unbelievable. Never would have thought Museum would beat Terminator Bale.

Decided to see Trek over Salvation this weekend and I'm glad I did. Abrams did a fantastic job and it was even better then I was expecting, kudos to the new cast. I was going to make sure and see Terminator on the big screen but after all the negative reviews and a collective 'meh' from fans I'll probably just wait and rent it on blu ray.

Looks like McG couldn't come through in the end, having a lower opening B.O. than T3 is just pathetic.


(Reply to this)
Chris B.
Chris B. writes:
on May 25 2009 09:42 PM

i don't understand why people had terminator grossing 100 million but too bad that it didn't. i thought it was awesome. at least star trek is still holding up good. drag me to hell next weekend.

(Reply to this)
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on May 25 2009 09:46 PM

I lost over 100 dollars when I placed my cash on T4 taking home the top spot. Damn you America! I'm seeing T4 some time this week, setting the bar low. Well, at least "Star Trek" is doing well. That makes me feel much better...*sigh*...money...

(Reply to this)
Greg_Arious
Greg_Arious writes:
on May 25 2009 09:59 PM

I really thought Terminator was gonna do so much better despite reviews. Thats a pretty low number.

(Reply to this)
King Thor
King Thor writes:
on May 25 2009 10:05 PM

Yeah pretty disappointing for TS. For some reason I had an iffy feeling about it and didn't think it was gonna take in as much as wolverine or star trek. Guess all the negative reviews don't help.

Also, does anyone else think that critics are harder on movies now than a few years ago? Terminator Salvation has a 34% on the Tomatometer and 5.1 average rating, yet most critics say it is better than T3 (a few say T3 is better), yet T3 is certified fresh at a 70% and 6.6 avg. rating?? Another great example is Wolverine-at 36% and 5.1 avg. rating, yet most people say it is much better than X3:the last stand which has a 56% and 5.9 avg rat.????

what's up with this? How can the general consensus be that one of the newer movies is better than the old, yet both new movies are rated much lower by both tomatometer and average rating????

Critics need to actually start CRITIQUING A MOVIE FOR WHAT IT IS!! and stop all their ****. You can actually see how many bad critics there are right now.
They all just look so damn foolish right now.


(Reply to this)
ZigBallistic
ZigBallistic writes:
on May 25 2009 10:14 PM

I didn't see it because of negative reviews(TS), I may still see it later on but too many good films coming up to waste my time when I need dvd rentals for my future :) Got UP and Drag me to Hell to look forward to now, right after I do my 16 mile relay leg this weekend :O

(Reply to this)
ARTaylor
ARTaylor writes:
on May 25 2009 10:20 PM

I for one enjoyed Terminator Salvation. To me, it was everything I wanted from Star Trek. It works as a reboot of sorts while fitting in perfectly as a sequel/prequel. It's a Terminator for a new age without resorting to that alternate universe crap. It didn't have a wonderful story but it was thoroughly entertaining. And best of all it was so much better than T3.

I am disappointed that TS didn't take top spot. Night at the Museum was pretty lousy and the sequel looked like more of the same. Then again I understand why. Night's only competition is Monsters vs Aliens. There's no other kid movies out now. But of course it will get creamed next weekend when Up comes out. Meanwhile TS had to split it's target demographic with Star Trek and Wolverine.


(Reply to this)
pota1974
pota1974 writes:
on May 25 2009 10:25 PM

I am glad Terminator Salvation came in 2nd --then we wont have to hear all the FanBoy BS!!!!!!

(Reply to this)
jokerboy1991
jokerboy1991 writes:
on May 25 2009 10:25 PM

I also like Terminator Salvation, despite the weak script and choppy editing, the action was done great and I liked a lot of the characters (Marcus, Kyle, Blair) even if they were under developed. I'm still hopeful for a fifth movie which I think will still happen. I think Terminator Salvation will end up with 165-190 million. Then it will make a lot more world wide.

(Reply to this)
David A.
David A. writes:
on May 25 2009 10:40 PM

Justice has been served! Isn't this great? It sure feels great. No seriously, I'd like to congratulate myself on predicting this **** movie would under perform. Night of the Museum was far more entertaining. And really, it wins thanks to Amy Adams and that super-cute aviator outfit.

With that said, I hope bad word of mouth continues to cause the numbers to plummet for Terminator Salvation and rule out any possible reboot or sequel. Shame on Warner Bros. for green-lighting this movie.


(Reply to this)
MarioHilario
MarioHilario writes:
on May 25 2009 10:43 PM

I made the mistake of going to a midnight release of TS. I should've gone with my instincts and avoided the crapfest of a movie it was. I'm actually grateful that Night beat it and I want my $10 back.

(Reply to this)
screwhead100
screwhead100 writes:
on May 25 2009 11:38 PM

i agree with jokerboy, i thought TS was leagues ahead of T3 even though that isnt saying much.....i give it a 7/10.....wish it did a little better at the box office but then again this isnt that bad considering T3 is considered a horrible movie so people might have wanted to stay away from this one based on the past movie.....

Lol at someone praising the new ben stiller movie....the trailer looked god awful for that, at least terminators trailer looked halfway decent......


(Reply to this)
TheIceGhost
TheIceGhost writes:
on May 25 2009 11:40 PM

Just got back from Salvation... I think it was a step away from being close -but-no-cigar, if that makes sense. Few reasons why it wasn't as good as it could'a been:

1.) Bale as John Conner was AAAWWWFUUUL. Easily the worst part of the movie (save one plot point which I'll remark on below). I really wish Nick Stahl had taken on the role again, I thought he was great in T3 (which, I actually like - or at least I don't think it's the wretched piece of filth most folks say it is).

2.) One too many cheesy lines.

3.) A few too many, "Gee - that's convenient!" moments.

4.) SPOILER DON'T READ IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE SPOILED!!!!

(What the hell was the point of Skynet's plan? Use Kyle Reese as bait so they can set a trap for John Conner? Why not just kill Kyle Reese on sight? That's, that's kinda what Terminators, ya' know, do? Kill Kyle, Conner doesn't exist. No trap needed. Also, why the hell wasn't John Conner looking for Reese prior to this movie? Don't you think that would'a been pretty high on his priority list?)

5.) The *boom event* before the very end was stupid and totally made a sequel retarded.

6.) ANOTHER KINDA SPOILER DON'T READ BLAH BLAH

(H.B.C "projected as momma Skynet" was so, so lame.)


There were some great bits though. Anton Yelchin was awesome as Reese, I would compare his performance to Ewan McGregor "channeling Alec Guinness" in Episode III. I liked the thought behind the Marcus character (save the fact that the dude's personality was totally cliche.) The tone was good, the action was pretty great, really the whole cast (save Bale.. ugh) was good. I dunno, I think the last act kinda tanked what was otherwise a pretty okay film. I think the worst part was that it COULD have been good with a few changes.


(Reply to this)
plus 7 agility
plus 7 agility writes:
on May 26 2009 12:34 AM

In reply to this comment (#2504117)
T4 had very very few cheesy lines compared to other movies, especially T3. I don't understand why T4 is getting such a bad rap though overall. Star Trek is certainly not 59% better than T4 according to the ratings.



(Reply to this)
gigaherc
gigaherc writes:
on May 26 2009 01:02 AM

In reply to this comment (#2504117)
Thing that makes me wonder - when the news of McG helming TS came up people started bashing, than when we knew Bale=Connor the anticipation grew every day, and now after the premiere a lot of you guys (I haven't seen it yet, it premiers in Poland on 6th June)seem to complain mainly on Bale's acting. WHY?

It seemed like the best thing about the sequel, it made many poeple believe it will be good, even without Arnie. I'm afraid viewers seem to be tired with Bale, starring in most huge productions lately (maybe I'm wrong, maybe it's his bad PR, and anger management issues).

How do you think?


(Reply to this)
Runtun
Runtun writes:
on May 26 2009 03:16 AM

Or maybe it's just the fact that Bale simply isn't that good in it? To be honest I think Bale is HUGELY overrated, especially with the budding cinephiles, of which many on this site would count as. He's certainly not crap, in fact he is a often very good, but has yet to deliver a really great performance. Now I'm sure a lot of people are going to turn up and be all "blah blah American Psycho blah blah The Machinist" but those performance were held from true greatness because the films that contained them simply weren't up to the task. Bale needs to work with more character oriented directors before he will really come into his own as an actor. Not this is NOT a slight against directors like Nolan etc, it's just character pieces are not really their focus. I would certainly wish for Bale to continue doing the mainstream stuff too but when it comes to the more artistic stuff his aim seems a little off to me. He choices seem to indicate that he is focused on how good his part is rather than the film as a whole and this hurts his potential. I actually think that his performance in '3:10 to Yuma' was one of his best, there was nothing showy about it, just a nicely fleshed out and believable character.

(Reply to this)
TombstoneLawDog
TombstoneLawDog writes:
on May 26 2009 04:32 AM

In reply to this comment (#2504117)
Well, I liked TS, anyway. Big, loud and often dumb as it was, it was fun and the action sequences were easily worth the price of admission.

Iceghost- my problem with __SPOILER__ Skynet's plan (even though I agree just killing Reese would've done the trick) is that it F#CKING WORKED!!!!
They GOT John AND Reese *Exactly* where they wanted them! They even brought out __MEGA SPOILER__ the Arnie bot to do Connor! (GREAT money shot on that, by the way) JOHN CONNOR AND KYLE REESE SHOULD'VE DIED!!! That's the part of the movie that really bothered me, that they did such a piss-poor job of explaining how the heros escape from what ABSOLUTELY would've been an inescapable situation. Don't have Connor thrown around a room at spine-shattering speed by a killer cyborg and then have him get up and freakin' LIMP.
And the 'heart' nonsense was a little too treacly for me.

This movie was a pleasant distraction, but it's getting what it deserved.


(Reply to this)
Confounded
Confounded writes:
on May 26 2009 04:39 AM

I like Bale. The problem is, I think his weak spots in acting are action. But because he's muscular, gruff, and handsome; he's the "perfect" action mold. Reign of Fire, Terminator, Batman; all his action roles seem so forced like he's trying WAY too hard. The best scenes in Batman Begins is when he's Bruce Wayne, not Batman. And we all know that he played a distant second to Ledger in the sequel.

Bale is just at his best when he's in a cerebral, cinematical role. No CG, high explosives, or hand-to-hand combat required. Don't let him anywhere near Michael Bay.

Plus, I have to imagine the PG-13 rating hurt in the end. No one wants to see a watered down version of a war against robots who kill without mercy or remorse. Bring on the blood, the bone crunching, the slow squeezes.


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • Tune In to the Rotten Tomatoes Show This Week! (3)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Museum Terminates Salvation (109)
  • Review Terminator Salvation, Night at the Museum 2, and Dance Flick on TV! (6)
  • Critics Consensus: Terminator, Night Are So-So Sequels (82)
  • Trailer Bulletin: Night at the Museum 2 Opens in new window (7)
  • New Night at the Museum 2 Stills Posted Opens in new window (6)
  • Transformers, Museum Sequels Headed for IMAX Opens in new window (4)
  • Christopher Guest Spending a Night at the Museum Opens in new window (3)
  • Ben Stiller, DreamWorks Herald The Return of King Doug (6)
  • Hank Azaria Joins Night at the Museum 2 and Year One (4)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (162)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (75)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (53)
  • Five Favorite Films with Werner Herzog (50)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (38)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (32)
  • RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Angels & Demons, Funny People, and Superman (13)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (3)

Latest News

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (3)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (38)
  • RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Angels & Demons, Funny People, and Superman (13)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (162)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (53)
  • Ho, ho, ho! It's RT's Great Big Gift Guide! (0)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (32)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (75)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)

Latest Interviews

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (4)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (8)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (6)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (15)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (18)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (8)
  • Wolverine Creator Len Wein Talks About the Film (28)
  • Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)
  • Duncan Jones talks Moon, Sam Rockwell, and Mute (14)

Latest Features

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (4)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • Five Favourite Films with Ang Lee (34)
  • 10 Movies That Changed The (End Of The) World (32)
  • Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (39)
  • 12 Facts About 2012 (135)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (18)
  • Five Favourite Films with 24's Carlos Bernard (33)
  • Six Horrible Part Sixes (32)
  • Christopher Smith's Favourite Cult Horror Films (14)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Games| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.