A Nightmare on Tim's Street: Day 1

Senior Editor Tim Ryan kicks off the first of nine terrifying nights with Freddy Krueger.

Day One: A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

On April 30, the rebooted Nightmare on Elm Street hits multiplexes, ready to bedevil the minds of a whole new generation. As someone who's only seen bits and pieces of Freddy Krueger in action over the years, I'll be watching every Nightmare installment in the days leading up to the new film's release. And I invite you to take a stroll down Elm Street with me.

Any fan of movies is certainly aware of Robert Englund's most famous role: the glove with knives, the red-and-green sweater, the tattered hat, and of course the badly mangled face of Freddy Krueger have become iconic in the world of horror cinema. For non-converts like myself, I've always wondered: why do people watch movies like this? What about a pizza-faced ghoul with knives on his fingers (or, for that matter, a guy in a hockey mask) makes gorehounds come back for seconds, thirds, and, in many cases, sixths?

Time will tell, but there's little doubt that director Wes Craven knew he had something good in Freddy from the opening sequence of A Nightmare on Elm Street. In a darkened, glowing workshop, we see a man hard at work, crafting a lethal set of knives and attaching them to a glove, his face out of the frame. It's a stellar introduction to Freddy Krueger, one that shows us the tools of a ghastly trade while maintaining a sense of menace and mystery about their maker.

It doesn't take long for us to get a sense of how Freddy is planning on employing his handiwork. In a darkened boiler room, he pursues Tina Gray (Amanda Wyss) cornering her in front of a raging inferno before she wakes up with a start. It was all a dream -- or was it? Tina soon discovers her friend Nancy Thompson (Heather Langenkamp) also has a madman stalking her subconscious mind. Frightened by her nocturnal visions, Tina asks Nancy and Glen (Johnny Depp, making his debut) to stay at her house -- with Tina's sometime-boyfriend Rod (Nick Corri) eventually showing up unannounced. He's not the only unexpected guest: after canoodling with Rod, Tina is again visited by the sinister figure of her dreams -- this time, however, she won't be able to wake up. Tina is levitated to the ceiling and slashed in every conceivable way before slumping to the floor (more on this sequence in a minute), and since Rod was alone in the room with her, he's charged with murder.

However, although Nancy knows the truth, her father (John Saxon), a local cop, and her mother (Ronee Blakley), who seems to harbor a dark secret of her own, refuse to believe her story. Meanwhile, every time she slips into repose -- be it in class, in the bathtub, or at a dream therapy clinic -- she's haunted by visions of lethal, shapeshifting Kruger. Nancy soon learns the reason: years earlier, her parents, and those of her classmates, banded together as vigilantes to kill the real-life Kruger -- a child-killer who was released on a legal technicality. Now, with Kruger terrorizing her dreams, Nancy loads up on coffee and caffeine pills in an effort to draw him back into the real world -- and hopefully defeat him.

While Nightmare contains many of the trappings of 1980s horror cinema -- absurd clothes, an ominous synthesized soundtrack, wildly variable acting from its cast -- it must be said that its remarkable special effects and sustained tension make it a superior example of the form. Nightmare owes an obvious debt to The Exorcist and Halloween, but it's got an energy and imagination all its own. Craven worked wonders on a limited budget, crafting several set-pieces of perverse ingenuity: Tina's gravity-defying death is a holy terror, as is a later scene in which a victim is pulled into a void in his bed, and a geyser of blood emerges. These sequences are gory, to be sure, but the blood and guts never upstage the suspense; by doling out the gruesomeness sparingly, Craven is able to keep us on our toes, not simply holding our stomachs.

A Nightmare on Elm Street was hardly the first horror film to utilize the premise that bad things will happen to the protagonists if they fall asleep -- Invasion of the Body Snatchers has it beat by a couple decades. And while Body Snatchers utilized the concept in an allegory about the Red Scare, Nightmare is less overtly political. Still, it can be read as a commentary on the state of families in the late 1970s and early 1980s; the teenagers depicted herein fall in a generation that saw the highest divorce rates in our country's history. It's also not surprising that our protagonists' parents are either divorced, alcoholic, or utterly oblivious to their children -- which only compounds the problem when there's a mad slasher haunting their dreams.

Watching this film, it's strange that Freddy Krueger has become something of a cuddly figure among horror fans. He's certainly plenty menacing here, and his physical appearance inspires revulsion. Though he has a few wisecracks ("I'm your boyfriend now, Nancy!" he says over a telephone, with his serpentine tongue licking her through the mouthpiece), Freddy is a thoroughly malevolent creature, mostly bereft of yucks and snappy punchlines. That's a good thing, as far as I'm concerned -- tapping into primal fears of the dark, of things that go bump in the night, and of nightmares is what Elm Street does best, and its flashes of humor never descend into out-and-out jokiness.

Of course, one of the main knocks on franchise horror flicks is that the sequels quickly lose sight of what worked the first time out, descending into cynical money-grabs. Will A Nightmare on Elm Street Part Two avoid this trap? Check back tomorrow for my recap.


Schedule of Nightmares:

Comments

Dave J

Dave J

The first "Nightmare" will always be the best no matter how many versions they make!!!

Apr 21 - 04:47 PM

tomwaitsjrHAPPYICONOCLAST

Greg Guro

Ok. Don't beat me up too bad, but I also recently visited this film.

I found the make-up to be really awful in certain scenes. The scene where Depps character is basically eaten by a bed has a noticeable skip of bad editing in it. Some of the acting was ridiculous.

Spoiler:

That ending after the ending with the freddy-mobile car pissed me off.

That said, it's a HELL of a lot better than the 2nd film, which is really not worth watching. The only one that holds up for me is New Nightmare.

I definately understand doing a re-make, now they can use better make-up effects and CGI.

Apr 21 - 04:48 PM

Dave J

Dave J

tomwaitsjr
In my opinion CGI "doesn't" do anything with me in terms of horror!! As a matter of fact sometimes I as a viewer can actually tell that it's CGI by looking it which would not be convincingly scary at all- give me the old style fashion make-up at any given time!

Apr 21 - 04:56 PM

Mr. Bo Ziffer

Arthur Grego

I heard somewhere that A Nightmare On Elm Street had three or four different endings, but the film makers couldn't decide which one to use. So they mushed them all together. That's probably why it sucked so much.

Apr 21 - 07:05 PM

Quadzilla99

Aaron Yovanovits

"I heard somewhere that A Nightmare On Elm Street had three or four different endings, but the film makers couldn't decide which one to use. So they mushed them all together. That's probably why it sucked so much."

95% on the tomato meter dude. Its a classic, and it does hold up to repeated viewings. As you can see by the poll its def the best in the series. Stop admitting you know nothing about movies.

Apr 21 - 09:51 PM

Mr. Bo Ziffer

Arthur Grego

I'm not talking about the movie in general, just the ending. I love the first movie. I voted for it myself. I just don't think it has a good ending.

Apr 22 - 02:16 AM

Dave J

Dave J

Mr. Bo Ziffer
"I heard somewhere that A Nightmare On Elm Street had three or four different endings, but the film makers couldn't decide which one to use."

I think the reason that happened is that the "studio" didn't know that the Nightmare series would become a "cult" phenomenum-- and it's not the first time that has happened actually- they're alot of other films had also done that as well such as - the well known one called "Blade Runner" that has, as I recall 5 different endings and "28 Days Later" has more than one ending This is more a business standpoint!!

But the thing is that you're basing this information from what you heard and the other question is even if these other endings do "exist" what kind of ending do you prefer to see, because as you say that this particular ending "sucks"!!

Apr 22 - 12:26 PM

Quadzilla99

Aaron Yovanovits

Oh, my apologies Mr. Bo. I liked the ending. But if I knew the alternatives and some seemed better, I might not. I'd rather not even know them in that case, why ruin anything about this movie for myself? Cheers to a fellow Nightmare fan.

Apr 23 - 03:34 PM

Dave J

Dave J

Mr. Bo Ziffer

Not to give anyone any misconceptions- I don't mind the ending of the first Elm Street film at all!!

Apr 22 - 03:47 PM

Mr. Bo Ziffer

Arthur Grego

I didn't hear this information from a friend. I saw it on a documentary about the rise of 80's slasher movies once Halloween and Friday the 13th came out. Eventually, it focused on Freddy, and apparently the studio couldn't decide on the three endings that were shot (getting in the car, Freddy and the mom, or the girls jump-roping), so they put them together. Even the producer's father was torn on it during the test screening.

As for what I think would be a better ending . . . I can't think of one. Maybe that is the ONLY ending the movie can have, considering how many sequels it had, or even by the tone of the movie. I just personally don't like it, just like how some people may not like the ending to Blade Runner, or 28 Days Later (if those people exist). I would still give the movie a 95%, totally.

Apr 23 - 08:17 AM

SBeakon

Stevo Sandknop

The things Craven managed to do with what little money he had is a hands-down example of cinema magic.

And the acting is supposed to be somewhat absurd, or he wouldn't have cast Ronee "Nashville" Blakley as Nancy's mother. Her performance (as well as several other elements in the movie) adds a certain amount of camp value that I'm sure wasn't lost on Craven, even in 1984.

Apr 21 - 07:06 PM

John S.

John Smith

nightmare elm street 3 and 4 were both pretty good, and the acting in this 1 wasnt bad at all...

Apr 22 - 10:13 PM

benc_academie

Benoit C

Agree, the 2nd is not worth watching. I bough all the movies but the 2nd.

Apr 23 - 04:53 AM

rle4lunch

Chad W

Good review. I'm hoping this remake/reboot breaks the mold of reboot ridiculousness!

Apr 21 - 05:15 PM

Jordan S.

Jordan Stanton

It's Micheal Bay so probably not.

Apr 22 - 06:20 PM

BlackPanther

Thomas Grady

That sucks that you have to watch the rest of them. You are going to think New Nightmare is Citizen Kane after Freddy's Dead.

Apr 21 - 05:18 PM

smi1ey

Matt Dunn

i love when you guys do these sessions of watching prior movies in a series. on with the show!

Apr 21 - 05:26 PM

Anzer

Steve Bernard

The first Nightmare on Elm Street is probably the best, but I can't wait for you to get to Dream Warriors; that has to be my personal favorite! XD

Apr 21 - 05:40 PM

Jalley O.

Jalley Oscar

I absolutely love the original "A Nightmare on Elm Street". I've seen it roughly a dozen times and find myself lured back to it at least once a year, even though I have the damn thing virtually committed to memory at this point. Growing up in the 80's, I followed this series religiously, and always felt that, apart from the original, "Dream Warriors" was the best in the series. However, I recently revisited "Warriors" for the first time in probably 15 years and found it to be a very mediocre affair, which was a huge disappointment considering the fondness I've harbored for it over the years. The FX are decent, and it's completely awesome to see a 19-year old Patricia Arquette in her screen debut, but the diabolical menace of the original incarnation of Krueger has here already been supplanted by this strange, wise-cracking, piss-poor stand-up comedian figure which would plague and hobble the rest of the films in this series, as well.

Apr 21 - 06:05 PM

King Crunk

King Crunk

This is the best one, feel bad that you are going to have to watch some of the sequels though, a few of them are downright awful! Although I do not think this series ever reached Jason Goes to Manhattan levels of bad lol.

Apr 21 - 06:06 PM

Patrick

Patrick Wagner

You know what's worse than Jason takes Manhattan? Nope, not Jason X. It's Jason Goes to Hell when the military kills him in the intro scene and the black mortian eats Jason's heart and becomes Jason... Bad, just bad!

Apr 21 - 08:51 PM

greg b.

greg baltzer

I agree in every way. Jason goes to Hell is the worst of all the Jason movies.

Apr 23 - 04:58 PM

Matt J.

Matt Johnson

Jason X.

Apr 21 - 09:08 PM

Matt J.

Matt Johnson

The Original and A New Nightmare were the scariest Elm Street movies. But Dream Warriors was the most action packed out of them. Freddy Vs. Jason is the last one I would recommend because of and the only reason how high the body count is.

Apr 21 - 09:23 PM

Matt J.

Matt Johnson

The Original and A New Nightmare were the scariest Elm Street movies. But Dream Warriors was the most action packed out of them. Freddy Vs. Jason is the last one I would recommend because of and the only reason how high the body count is.

Apr 21 - 09:26 PM

Matt J.

Matt Johnson

I don't care what people think about my comment on watching Freddy Vs. Jason. To me that movie was not suppose to have a great story or cast. Because the movie was all about Freddy and Jason. There were really only 5 people I recognized in that movie and that's only because I have seen a part of them in another movie.

Apr 21 - 09:31 PM

cjjojay

Stefan Gill

"There were really only 5 people I recognized in that movie and that's only because I have seen a part of them in another movie."

Which part, the decapitated head? ZING!

Apr 22 - 12:38 PM

tomwaitsjrHAPPYICONOCLAST

Greg Guro

2nd was so boring. ..

I liked a lot of part III, but the claymation in the car junk yard was kind of funny. I also had a good laugh at the TV-Freddy monster. . .

Apr 21 - 06:19 PM

Matt J.

Matt Johnson

The second one had some creepy moments and a couple jump scenes. But the story didn't really catch my attention. You know what I'm saying.

Apr 21 - 09:33 PM

gigantor21

Messler Messla

Yeah, you've pretty much hit the peak of the series. It's all downhill from here. 4 and 5 fit your "cynical cash-grab" description to a tee; 6 is just horrendous at every level.

Apr 21 - 06:29 PM

Hot Pink Nation

Jason Thomas

While never reaching the depths of either the Friday the 13 or Halloween franchises, the late-middle chapters of the Nightmare series are pretty crappy. By the time you plow through parts 4, 5, and 6 (the abominable "Freddy's Dead") you're gonna think Wes Craven's New Nightmare is Casablanca.

This is the definitive quality ranking of the Nightmare on Elm Street Series (from best to worst):
1. A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)
2. Part 3: Dream Warriors (1987)
3. Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994)
4. Part 4: The Dream Master (1988)

and then it starts sliding down the shute

5. Part 2: Freddy's Revenge (1985)
6. Part 5: The Dream Child (1989)
7. Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991)

Apr 21 - 06:38 PM

blattman

Mike Greenblatt

I liked 1, 3, and 5 the best. I have good hopes for the new one. Love Jackie Earl Haley for the lead.

Apr 21 - 06:54 PM

Zombies happen.

Serpent T Rainbow

Good luck tomorrow buddy, the second one is ever so bad.

Apr 21 - 07:07 PM

The.Watcher

The Watcher

The first, third and seventh (New Nightmare) are all great movies.
The rest suck bad.

Apr 21 - 07:12 PM

tomwaitsjrHAPPYICONOCLAST

Greg Guro

Wasn't Dream Child in 3-D?

Apr 21 - 08:26 PM

dethburger

dethburger hates Flixster

No,
Freddys Dead was in 3D. (only the ending was in 3D)

Apr 21 - 09:27 PM

rle4lunch

Chad W

Yeah, i remember that. It was a stupid/weird ending.

Apr 22 - 12:18 PM

Patrick

Patrick Wagner

Does anyone own the box set of the Nightmare on Elm Street movies? It has to have one of THE BEST extras I've ever seen thrown into a bonus disc. In it you go to an interactive building where you can move from room to room via your DVD remote's arrow keys. In each room you can click on items to see countless clips, stills, production items, memoribilia, and SO MUCH MORE. It also has you find keys and codes to move into other parts of the building. It is amazing if you have the time to view it all.

And as for the movies, anyone remember the Nintendo Power Glove scene?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otBNYc0lJ6Y

Apr 21 - 08:58 PM

greg b.

greg baltzer

I agree in every way. Jason goes to Hell is the worst of all the Jason movies. If no one remembers the power glove watch Fred Savages movie "The Wizard". lol

Apr 23 - 04:59 PM

RamALamADingDong

That Guy

This movie is the only one I own. And if they ever come out with a special edition of New Nightmare I'd get that. I can't stand the other movies I've seen, and I stopped after 3. This is the second best slasher movie ever, after the original Halloween.

Apr 21 - 08:58 PM

Ryan W.

Ryan Watson

I recently just watched all 8 movies in a row (I'm a sucker for continuous story, especially in the 80's horror craze). I found the first one really well done, in terms of the context of the mid 80's. The only thing I disliked in it was the occasional quirky punchlines and puns (which again, may have been related to the context of teen attitude at the time) and I disliked the ambiguous ending in which you assume that all the teenagers die, and Nancy's mom is alive. Craven definitely had a good vision when putting this together, and the premise is completely amazing. The only other one I like is Freddy vs. Jason, which went back to the horror principles (red head screaming "somebody please wake me up!"), and brought in two horror icons and merged the stories quite well.

Other than those two, I severely disliked all the others. The main point of my dislike is the extreme lack of story consistency, which is probably relevant to Craven not being involved in most of the sequels. In the second one Freddy is able to come out of the dreams by taking over the main characters body and basically pulling an "alien-like" effect. The third one Nancy comes back into the picture, and it seems like the end of the first movie never even existed since her friends and mother are still dead. My other dislike for this movie was that it tried to be a bit humourous, which gave it a childlike feeling and downplayed the horror. I could go on, but avid watchers can see the argument I could make for the other movies. This fits right in with his inability to die, and at the end of each movie the main character in their own way finds a way to beat him in which they think he is dead forever.

However, I am very excited for this remake. I have watched the trailers over and over again, and from the bits and pieces I've gathered it looks like they will go back again to the horror principles of the first - which really makes Freddy look outstanding (and with Haley's acting, he probably will be). Also, they will standardize it for today's audiences, so it will be a cool new outlook (using computers, blogs, etc). The third reason I want to see this is the fact that they have added Freddy's initial burning into the movie, and it looks as though he is innocent to the murders, which seems to be a new outlook onto the series. If so then it will play really well into the movies (innocent man is burned, comes back to kill the killer's children). But only time will tell.

Apr 21 - 09:43 PM

Dave J

Dave J

Ryan W.

From what I'm gathering from your take on this remake is that part of this story is taken from a "Simpsons" Horror episode where Willy the Janitor comes back to kill the children and this film is somewhat identical by what you're saying "Freddy comes back to kill the killer's children"!!

Apr 22 - 11:26 AM

rt-ryan

Ryan Fujitani

Dave, I think the Simpsons episode is actually an homage to the original Elm Street. Though Freddy's backstory isn't revealed in a WHOLE LOT of detail, it is made pretty clear that he was a janitor at a school who was burned alive for killing children; then he comes back to haunt the children of those who killed him. When you take into consideration the fact that a lot of the Simpsons' Treehouse of Horror Halloween episodes pay homage to iconic horror films, it makes even more sense.

The new Nightmare on Elm Street is pretty much a remake of the original, so the story is actually the same; I personally don't know for sure that Freddy will be revealed as an innocent man wrongly killed, but the original movie never really addresses whether or not Freddy was guilty or innocent of his crimes, so that will definitely be interesting to see.

Apr 22 - 12:38 PM

Dave J

Dave J

RT-Ryan

But for now, we can only speculate and assume until it's properly screened for the audience!!!

Apr 22 - 02:20 PM

Captain Tripps

Captain Tripps

I don't think he'll actually be innocent, that would be a horrible decision. In the original series it's definitely shown that he is a murderer (there's a sequence right before he gets burned alive where he's shown with a little girl in the boiler room, then timeskip to him tossing her clothes in the burner - which oddly makes me think of the similiar scene from Watchmen). Plus all the backstory about his mother being raped by inmates and the whole deal with demons thing, none of which make sense if he's not an evil man.

Of course he's going to plead innocence in the face of vengeance, child killers are notoriously cowardly when confronted by adults.

Apr 25 - 08:16 AM

Drew J.

Drew Johnson

I was hoping you guys would do one of these for Freddy. I love reading these every day. I wish you somehow could collaborate with Netflix and have the Nightmare's available instantly during this time. I always want to keep up and watch along with you, but getting them in the mail just doesn't work out fast enough to watch one per day.

Apr 21 - 09:57 PM

inactive user

Jared King

About damn time you got back to the retrospectives.

Apr 21 - 09:59 PM

What's Hot On RT

24 Frames
24 Frames

Pictures from a zombie nation

Blue Jasmine
Blue Jasmine

Woody Allen in San Francisco

<em>The Hobbit</em>
The Hobbit

See the Desolation of Smaug trailer!

Summer Scorecard
Summer Scorecard

Where does This Is the End rank?

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile