Box Office Guru Wrapup: Oz Racks Up Enchanting Debut
The Disney prequel's $80.3 million is the best of the year so far.
This weekend, Disney's big-budget Emerald City gamble paid off as the expensive 3D prequel Oz the Great and Powerful opened to sensational results at the North American box office accounting for well over half of all ticket sales thanks to one of the biggest debuts ever seen at this time of year. The PG-rated adventure bowed to a stunning $80.3M, according to estimates, from 3,912 theaters resulting in a spectacular $20,521 average.
It was the third biggest March opening ever trailing last year's The Hunger Games ($152.5M) and the 2010 Johnny Depp mega-smash Alice in Wonderland ($116.1M) and the fourth best during the entire January-to-March corridor. Directed by Sam Raimi, Oz stars James Franco, Mila Kunis, Michelle Williams, and Rachel Weisz and tells the origin story behind the classic story The Wizard of Oz. The production budget is estimated to be at a staggering $215M but the excellent debut now indicates that this will end up as a moneymaker -- quite possibly with over $600M in global box office plus ancillaries.
The Mouse House had its marketing machine working overtime for months to build excitement and the campaign worked. Families were genuinely excited but so were adult women, teens, and young adults so the broad appeal helped fuel a wider turnout. Plus the brand was popular and relevant making for a film that moviegoers would be interested in paying to see.
Oz started out with a stellar $24.1M opening day on Friday which included $2M from Thursday night shows. Saturday saw a solid 37% boost to $33M while Sunday is estimated to decline by 30% to $23.1M. Alice -- another 3D family-oriented adventure released by Disney in early March -- saw more of its mammoth opening weekend haul turn out upfront on Friday with Saturday inching up only 8%. It went on to finish its domestic run with nearly three times its opening figure and more than $1 billion worldwide. However, that film had the starpower of Johnny Depp and was released during the early stages of the 3D boom when movie fans were more eager to pay the higher ticket prices.
2013 has been a mostly disappointing year with very few films scoring big openings or overperforming. Oz more than doubled the year's largest opening to date -- Identity Thief's $34.6M. That comedy is also the top-grossing film of the year but the title will be swiped away by Oz next weekend. The magician and the three witches also grossed more on opening weekend than last year's budget-busting flops John Carter and Battleship made during their entire runs. Even last weekend's Jack the Giant Slayer won't reach a final North American tally close to Oz's great and powerful weekend.
Oz the Great and Powerful also opened day and date in 80% of the international marketplace this weekend and banked an estimated $69.9M from 46 territories making for a massive $150.2M worldwide opening. Some key markets like China and France are still to come later this month. Featuring a very American story and setting, Oz has less global appeal when compared to other recent movie franchises like The Hobbit, Harry Potter, James Bond, Pirates of the Caribbean, or even Wonderland. But 3D visual spectacles do sell and the studio made a conscious effort to tour the stars around the world in recent weeks for red carpet premieres in Tokyo, Moscow, and London to help energize global ticket buyers.
Despite its B+ CinemaScore grade last weekend when it opened, the big-budget fairy tale adventure Jack the Giant Slayer tumbled a disturbing 63% in its sophomore frame to an estimated $10M. Oz certainly took away much of the target audience but overall consumer excitement for the Warner Bros. release was never very strong to begin with. With $43.8M in ten days, Jack should end its domestic run with a disappointing $60-65M. Produced for nearly $200M excluding global marketing costs, the actioner will deliver substantial losses. The comedy hit Identity Thief held up well in its fifth weekend sliding only 35% to an estimated $6.3M giving Universal $116.5M to date.
Another month, another R-rated action film dies on impact. The Colin Farrell revenge pic Dead Man Down debuted poorly in fourth with only $5.4M, according to estimates, for a weak $2,445 average from 2,188 locations. Adult men made up the core crowd as demographic data showed that the audience was 60% male and 75% over 25. Reviews were not very kind and moviegoers had little praise either as the CinemaScore was a lackluster B- for the FilmDistrict release.
Two films tied for fifth place according to estimates with $5.1M a piece. The Lionsgate action title Snitch posted a very good hold easing 34% with $31.9M to date. Relativity's party comedy 21 and Over dropped by a reasonable 42% and has banked $16.8M after ten days. The distributor's romance hit Safe Haven followed with an estimated $3.8M, down 40%, and a cume of $62.9M.
With Oscar heat evaporating, Silver Linings Playbook fell by 35% -- the largest decline yet of its 17-week run. The Weinstein Co. release grossed $3.7M and upped its sum to an impressive $120.7M. The distributor claimed ninth place too with its animated entry Escape From Planet Earth which got hurt by Oz falling 52% to an estimated $3.2M. The 3D toon has collected $47.8M. Rounding out the top ten was the horror sequel The Last Exorcism Part II which crashed by 60% in its second weekend with an estimated $3.1M. Cume for CBS Films is $12.1M.
In the specialty arena, the Tommy Lee Jones film Emperor generated a mild debut with an estimated $1M from 260 locations for a soft $4,012 average for Roadside Attractions. Reviews were somewhat negative. Also in limited release, Michel Gondry's The We and the I debuted with strong results grossing $12,280 from a solo theater in New York ahead of an expansion to other top markets later this month from Paladin and 108 Media.
The top ten films grossed an estimated $126M which was up 9% from last year when The Lorax remained at number one in its second weekend with $38.8M; and up 13% from 2011 when Battle: Los Angeles debuted in the top spot with $35.6M.
Follow Gitesh on Twitter!
Brenton Malnofski
I truly think Oz deserves its box office attention. I was skeptical going into it, but I came out loving it. Really thought it was great. Second time in recent memory that I've strongly disagreed with the critical consensus, after The Hobbit.
Mar 10 - 07:22 PM
This comment has been removed.
Michael Kehoe
I just love clever people. You obviously are not one of them.
Mar 11 - 05:36 AM
J M
And you are rude.
Mar 11 - 05:48 PM
Matthew Reimer
I agree, I liked Oz, not the best movie but not the worst movie. Even if the critics don't like it doesn't mean you might not like it.
Mar 11 - 05:37 AM
Big Brother
Well, it is at 61% that's pretty much RT's definition of not the best, not the worst.
Mar 11 - 04:00 PM
Matthew Reimer
I wasn't saying of what RT meant, I was saying that's how I felt.
Mar 11 - 04:40 PM
Big Brother
Was just saying a lot of people seem to be coming out saying "I'm not listening to the critics on this or Jack and the Giant Killer", just saying I don't think the critics are savaging these films. Everybody seems to be in agreement ok to good films, not going to change anyones religion.
Mar 11 - 07:05 PM
Matthew Reimer
Ok, I see your point.
Mar 11 - 08:27 PM
John Maher
I found nothing to dislike about OZ, other than it could have used slightly better editing, which is true of every film made, today. I also love SPIDERMAN 3 (my favorite of the franchise), so there you go!
Mar 11 - 11:15 AM
Saetre Saetre
Spider-Man 3 was your favorite of the franchise? Why?
Mar 11 - 03:11 PM
Mohd Syafiq Bin Jabaruddin
For me, it's because Raimi totally embraces the goofiness of the Silver Age comic books he grew up with and resisting the pressure to make his movie 'darker'. While most depiction of Peter under symbiote influences makes him violent and hateful, Raimi knows his version of Peter is a dork and he acts exactly like how Peter would think a 'cool' character acts.
Mar 11 - 11:33 PM
Lyle Bandoquillo
I gotto say, I actually enjoyed SM3 out all of them LOL. Maybe its cuz I never cared for the first two and, going in on the 3rd with even lower expectations, I was throughly enetrtained (and I enjoyed the homour of evil-douchebag Peter Parker)
Mar 11 - 03:13 PM
Josiah Coulter
Oz was awesome and deserved its box office glory! (as did The Hobbit -- still love the fact that it made over $300 million when soooo many people said it wouldn't).
Mar 11 - 12:14 PM
Big Brother
Still can hardly consider that a rousing success based on the performance of the Rings films. Think of it like Avengers not paying off as well as say Thor.
Mar 11 - 04:03 PM
Janson Jinnistan
??? Sorry, Bro, but some facts and figures: "Fellowship" = 314.7 million (870 mill ww), "Two Towers" = 342 mill (926 mill), "Return" = 377.8 mill (1.1 bill) compared to "Hobbit" = 300+ mill (1+ bill). Obviously there's some inflation, but it's hardly an embarassment in comparison. Meanwhile, "Thor" = 188 mill (445 mill)
Mar 11 - 04:47 PM
Big Brother
I agree it wasn't an embarrassment, just not a rousing success and with Thor I was just saying Fellowship not performing as well as LOTR's is roughly like the hypothetical if The Avengers had made a few million less than Thor. It would have been a decent BO return by most standards, but obviously not what Marvel was shooting for, just like The Hobbit did fine, but obviously not as well as hoped based on the wait, Jackson's return and the reasonable expectation that it would be as good.
Mar 11 - 07:10 PM
Big Brother
The real telling factor will be how the next chapter turns out, I'm thinking worse because for me The Hobbit spent quite a bit of the good will earned by the LOTR's series.
Mar 11 - 07:11 PM
Infernal Dude
BB, you're still going to see them. I'm going to see them. Everyone is going to see them. I agree H:UJ is the weakest of the series but we're nerds and nerds are cool now so everyone is a nerd thus the next two Hobbits will go ham at the BO.
Mar 11 - 08:19 PM
Big Brother
Oh definately, even though I was a bit underwhelmed by The Hobbit it was still definately worth seeing and I don't feel I was cheated out of my money. I just think it will have lost a few of the neutrals because I think a lot of the uninitiated thought it was going to a sort of second coming of LOTR's which it really never could have been because that's not what the story of The Hobbit is.
Mar 11 - 08:41 PM
Janson Jinnistan
My point: a billion damn dollars.
Mar 11 - 11:00 PM
King Simba
Hobbit's gross kind of falls into the "really big, but you get the feeling it should have made more". 300 mil is normally a fantastic gross, but it's surprising that it ended up being the lowest grossing film in the franchise, despite a decade of inflation and 3d ticket prices to its advantage. It's also a little telling that it ended up being the lowest grosser despite having the biggest start.
However, I do think there's a lot of potential for the second film to improve, both quality wise and subsequently at the box office, now that everything has been set up in the first.
Mar 12 - 10:23 AM
Janson Jinnistan
It's still the 14th highest grossing film of all-time. Only "King" (6th all-time) did better. "Fellowship" has the lowest gross out of the LOTR films.
Mar 13 - 08:00 AM