En Passion (A Passion) (The Passion of Anna) - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

En Passion (A Passion) (The Passion of Anna) Reviews

Page 1 of 1
Ken Hanke
Mountain Xpress (Asheville, NC)
September 5, 2007
Flawed, but still brilliant, The Passion is an essential.
Full Review | Original Score: 4.5/5
Jeffrey M. Anderson
Combustible Celluloid
August 11, 2007
Sven Nykvist's color cinematography makes Ullmann's blue eyes a thing to behold.
Dennis Schwartz
Ozus' World Movie Reviews
August 10, 2007
Never less than fascinating, even when it falters.
Full Review | Original Score: A

TV Guide's Movie Guide
August 29, 2006
The Passion of Anna employs some interesting techniques, such as interviews with each of the four main actors and also sheds some light on many of the baroque mannerisms and symbols that have come to be associated with Bergman.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
Top Critic
Derek Adams
Time Out
June 24, 2006
Another bold step forward in Bergman's analysis of human isolation.
Emanuel Levy
EmanuelLevy.Com
June 16, 2005
| Original Score: 4/5
Leo Goldsmith
Not Coming to a Theater Near You
April 14, 2004
The "passion" of the film's title is not a physical suffering, like Christ's at Golgotha, but an emotional one, an exposing of oneself to the world for the sake of love.
Pablo Villaça
Cinema em Cena
February 22, 2004
Um filme de erros e acertos: o plano final, por exemplo, é brilhante; em contrapartida, as entrevistas com os atores durante a projeção acabam soando apenas pretensiosas.
| Original Score: 3/5
Top Critic
Vincent Canby
New York Times
December 8, 2003
The Passion of Anna is one of Bergman's most beautiful films (it is his second in color), all tawny, wintry grays and browns, deep blacks, and dark greens, highlighted occasionally by splashes of red, sometimes blood.
Full Review | Original Score: 5/5
Carol Cling
Las Vegas Review-Journal
August 22, 2003
| Original Score: 5/5
Sam Jordison
Film4
May 24, 2003
While it lacks the lightness of touch and smooth flow that distinguishes Bergman at his finest, this is still a powerful, profound work of art.
Top Critic
Don Druker
Chicago Reader
January 1, 2000
A tentative, plotless film that pulses with the rhythms of life rather than the rhythms of drama.
Page 1 of 1