|
| 31% | Machete Kills | Oct 11 |
| —— | Haunt | Oct 11 |
| 41% | All the Boys Love Mandy Lane | Oct 11 |
| Show All... | ||
|
| 38% | The Purge | Jun 07 |
| 84% | Much Ado About Nothing | Jun 07 |
| 78% | Europa Report | Aug 02 |
| Show All... | ||
|
| 4% | Scary Movie 5 | Apr 12 |
| 67% | World War Z | Jun 21 |
| 87% | Star Trek Into Darkness | May 16 |
| Show All... | ||
|
| 65% | The Heat | Jun 28 |
| 63% | Kevin Hart: Let Me Explain | Jul 03 |
| 97% | A Hijacking | Jun 21 |
| Show All... | ||
|
|
| Show All... |
|
| Show All... |
Pulling Strings
Randy Cordova
Arizona Republic
|
|
|
|
|
Eastbound & Down: Season 4
Jon Caramanica
New York Times
|
|
|
|
|
Please log in to participate in this forum.
Just came out of the movies, What a waste of crap. A single propelled engine without modifications wins the race. Its engine seals were leaking from the start. Atleast my eight year daughter enjoyed just because it had an indian character with indian music. 3 year old son, lost interest after 15mins of the movie. Not even close to CARS! I think if they released this before TURBO, they might have pulled it off. Right now, I am just thinking, $42 dollars for a Family Pass, $15 combo deals x 2 for kids which got them 2 die cast toys. ( I ended up buying extra $10 on a F16 fightler) Rather took them to the Airport to watch planes fly in and out with dinner! hahaha
Sep 29 - 01:59 AM
I'm seeing it 2morrow nite don't know why every one is treating it like crap just because your to embarrassed to say it looks good cuz it's a kids movie doesn't mean it's bad. Also I'm in middle school and I still wanna c it so don't b afraid to say u wanna c it its just your opinion
Sep 10 - 05:48 PM
Why can't we go back to when their CGI movies were good! The Incredibles, Toy Story, Monster's Inc, etc. I am very VERY worried about Star Wars VII!
Sep 8 - 02:14 PM
This is a letdown of a movie. The plot is too predictable (i can already predict the entire movie myself), the idea is unoriginal and horrible, and let's face it: It'll NEVER achieve the popularity of the Cars franchise. Cars was an original idea that made sense. The exact opposite can be said for Planes. It is just a desperate attempt at a money grab. Heck, they're just making this crappy-ass movie just to have a REASON to make their new, movie-based toys, which made more money than the last two Cars Movies.
And why does it get the money to do this? Kids. Need I say more? I think not!
Kids these days are drawn into goofy animation, and knowing the success of Cars (which would be very enjoyable for kids as well), the producers will just try to make their money by luring in kids, who will beg their parents to waste a gruesome 92 minutes, when they could invest in some other kids movie, even a rental. Just don't watch it. You'll regret it. Even if you came just to see how much it failed, you probably shouldn't do that, either. Leave the damn movie alone and watch as Disney sees how smart they really are.
@Lee Augustus your idea for Incredibles 2 is a brilliant one. However, it seems that Disney needs some more box office flops and commercial toys to make back their loss before they create a film that'll actually blow people's minds.
Aug 12 - 05:48 AM
Nobody likes Cars or Cars 2? That's really exaggerating things. Cars was actually pretty well loved both by critics and audiences. It just wasn't universally acclaimed like most other Pixar movies. Cars 2 - well, not so much, but even it has its share of fans.
Personally, I think Cars is a little underrated. It sold so much merchandise that it's easy to think of it as merely a cash cow for the studio, but the film itself I thought was a fond look at old town life with a strong theme of learning to slow down and appreciate the finer things in life. As for Cars 2, I don't think it's as bad as its reviews. It's way better than similarly rated films such as Chicken Little and Shark Tale. I thought it was well made but so emotionally hallow that it's easily the weakest film for Pixar.
Planes, don't care about it. It doesn't seem like Toon Disney is going to stop with their mediocre sequels and spinoff, but at least it's not impacting the films of Pixar and Disney Animation Studios.
Aug 11 - 01:41 PM
Unfortunately, as long as kids continue to spend their money on all of this vehicle shit, it doesn't seem like it's going to happen (heck, Paramount already has that Monster Trucks movie in works).
And, until someone gets Bird's lazy-ass to work on a sequel to Incredibles (the ONLY Pixar film that deserves & needs a sequel), it won't be happening, because Pixar is too busy with Finding Derpy.
Aug 10 - 03:50 PM
Wait, so just because Brad Bird doesn't want to make a quick cash-grab sequel and wait until he can find the right story that makes him lazy?
Aug 11 - 03:43 AM
How does a sequel to a movie that deserves it make it a cash grab? Sure there's others but Incredibles sequel would not be a cash grab.
Aug 11 - 02:46 PM
I'm simply saying that what Brad Bird is doing isn't laziness. He's just waiting until he can find the right story. It's good that he's taking his time and isn't rushing things just because a lot of people want a sequel. If he does find a good story then I look forward to seeing it, if he doesn't well then it's best to leave Incredibles alone.
Aug 11 - 03:43 PM
WELL I LOVE CARS! It was amazing any one that hates it just hates fun and good story telling.
Aug 9 - 11:47 PM
Good storytelling?! HA! It's a rip-off of Doc Hollywood (and poorly done) that only lobotomized adults & dim-witted kids would like.
And "fun and good storytelling" comes from companies like Ghibli.
Aug 10 - 03:46 PM
It's her opinion. Stop being such an ass to people who like Pixar beccause you can't let go of the past.
Aug 10 - 04:37 PM
Oh yeah. I saw her arguing with you and the other guy on the Avatar front page thing. She just loves picking fights.
Aug 11 - 09:47 AM
I don't pick fights. The fact that they replied to what I said is a different situation (not to mention that the other idiot frankly asks for it).
And I have a dick,thank you very much.
Aug 11 - 02:47 PM
Pixar made back-to-back beautiful films with "Monsters Inc." and "Finding Nemo." They did almost as well with "Ratatouille" and "Wall-E". But ever since Disney got into bed with Pixar, you can see how the mantra has changed. I enjoyed "Monsters University" but you could see how even that was watered down to fit the Disney formula. Now the Mouse House is taking a lame character to start with (those in the "Cars" movies") and force-feeding cliches and tired kids' movies formulas ("believe in yourself!", "follow your dreams!", "there's a sexy and sassy girl character that makes the boy character stammer and go ga-ga!") down the proverbial throat, all in the name of money and nothing else. Have I seen it? No. The previews (and critics' reviews) have told me all I need to know. Enough already!!
Aug 9 - 11:18 AM
I have to tell you that Disney has been with Pixar since toy story 1 so more than Disney been killing it. Think is more as a ego problem at Pixar or maybe they are just fighting with the people that can do better stories I mean they had a story about 2 blue reptiles that was the last pair of their species so they should be together and save its raze but the project was canceled and that's the exact same plot of rio the difference is those are birds( and the movie is pretty good I think). I don't know maybe my conjecture is wrong
Aug 26 - 01:16 AM
I remember seeing cars when I was like 12 it was extremely boring and it only served to get my mind off of boredom
Aug 8 - 11:55 AM
I liked Cars. No it wasn't Pixar's finest film in what seems to be the Golden Age of Pixar movies, but it was still solid. Cars 2 was the studio's first true flop, but I guess Disney thinks they can still make a nice chunk of change from a Planes movie.
Aug 8 - 08:04 AM
Parents no doubt wanting 90 minutes of distraction for their kids will pay money for this crap, thereby encouraging a Planes 2... *shudders*
I gotta say that "Cars" was pretty good, don't know what the hate is there. The second one was ghastly though, no doubt there...
Aug 7 - 01:32 PM
Cars was amazing, but for me Cars 2 was a wtf moment and then I saw a commercial for planes and I was like...I may buy this dvd, then I saw COMING SOON TO THEATERS and proceeded to burn my theater down. It may be good but no way will I see it, and WTF is it rated PG for? Come on now Disney.
Aug 3 - 11:58 PM
if you dont want to see it then dont see it. Dont talk crap about it. I saw it tonight, its a good movie.
Aug 2 - 08:00 PM
I like both Cars and Cars 2, although I think I'll give this a rental instead.
Jul 30 - 06:13 PM
A name has nothing to do with whether or not someone likes something, anders. I have a stormtrooper as my avi, I haven't been a fan of Star Wars in years.
Honestly, the things RT users say sometimes. It's baffling...
Aug 5 - 04:57 PM
Well, then maybe you should think about changing your outdated profile pic to better suit your personality! Also, stop being such an inexcusably condescending fuckwad.
Aug 7 - 01:43 AM
Children, you see, love the Cars franchise.
Second, I would love an Incredibles 2 but I don't see it happening until Disney forces Pixar to do a few more sequels.
Jul 30 - 06:59 AM
I guess Pixar isn't what they used to be. After Toy Story 3 they gave up on the great movies they were making for years
Jul 29 - 06:17 PM
I disagree. The only true 'pixar' moment of Monsters University was Mike's emotional break down by the river. Everything else about the plot was generic and predictable.
Aug 10 - 01:20 PM
Firstly, plenty of people liked Cars and Cars 2. Don't make such a gross generalization.
Secondly, The Incredibles already had a sequel in the form of The Incredibles: Attack of the Mole Men. Or do video games not count?
And finally, PIXAR ISN'T MAKING THIS MOVIE. So don't go wagging your finger at a company when it isn't warranted. Instead, poke around and lay blame at DisneyToons; after all, this one was their idea, not Pixar's.
But who cares, right? It's from the Cars universe, so it MUST be Pixar's fault! *Sarcasm*
Jul 29 - 04:52 PM
The average consumer wouldn't have known DisneyToons was the production head behind Planes. The fact that there is a Pixar logo, to most people, means that Pixar's reputation suffers if Planes is a bad movie. It doesn't matter that Pixar was sub-contracted to do the animation only.
Aug 10 - 01:22 PM
I mist disagree with the evaluation of the first "Cars". It was well done with good character development, a good story line, great voices and a message that both kids and adults could take a lesson from. I agree "Cars 2" was dreadful and never should have been made. The "Toy Story" series got better and stronger with each movie and "Up" was amazing and "The Incredibles" was very well done (and needs a sequel). My whole family did not like "Wall-e" and have little hope for "Finding Dory", the "Nemo" sequel. I have hopes for "Planes" that it will be entertaining and fresh with a decent story line, and not just a cheap attempt for a cash cow turned out from the Disney mass production line.
Jul 29 - 05:49 AM
They make a lot of money in merchandising from these films. Hence, the reason that Cars 2 was made and now Planes. From a studio perspective, it's just good business. From an audience perspective, it's really fucking stupid.
Jun 24 - 08:53 PM
The fact that Disney Toon Studios are making this, not Pixar, indicates that this film will only be for children.
Jun 12 - 08:14 AM
When has DisneyToon Studios made anything for the plus ten crowd? Ninety-nine percent of their work (television animation, direct-to-video Disney sequels, spin-off Tinker Bell movies) is aimed purely for kiddies, unlike movies from Pixar and the Walt Disney Animation Studios which are generally aimed at the family audience as a whole. There may be a few adults that find something cute or charming in some of their films (I have a soft spot for Pooh's Grand Adventure), but there is a distinct difference between making films for families and making films for kids, and DisneyToon Studios has always embodied the latter.
Jul 31 - 01:29 AM
The folks at Disney really should have just shoved this into their pile of crappy direct-to-DVD sequels.
Jun 8 - 02:59 PM
Some of you are forgetting that these movies are made for kids.
They don't care about originality, Dane Cook or the downfall of Disney.
They see a talking car do funny stuff and they're happy as can be.
Jun 7 - 11:35 PM
Pixar has become "Disney & Pixar" when they found out how to wear an idea into nothingness
Mar 17 - 05:07 PM
Practically every Pixar/Disney movie made since Finding Nemo has SUCKED. Wall-e, Cars, Cars II, Toy Story III, Brave, and YES, UP-- They're all awful. If you want some creativity in film, watch Monsters Inc or The Incredibles.
Mar 16 - 11:39 AM
Both of which came out after Finding Nemo. On top of that, you only state Pixar's films. I believe How To Train Your Dragon is an absolute masterpiece, deserving of a mention with Finding Nemo, etc. Then there are the non-Pixar Disney films, like Wreck-It Ralph, and The Princess and The Frog, both of which are great.
Mar 16 - 04:32 PM
I have not seen Wreck-It Ralph, The Princess and The Frog, or How To Train Your Dragon, so I can't speculate on their quality. Oh, and I forgot another one that sucked: Despicable Me.
Mar 17 - 05:53 PM
Joseph, How to Train Your Dragon was a really good movie, but it wasn't Disney, it was Paramount. Despicable Me was Universal. As for DISNEY/PIXAR, the only films I didn't like were Cars (and Cars 2 obviously) and Brave. The rest are fantastic.
Jun 7 - 04:31 PM
Wall-E is beautiful and emotional in many places without the need for dialogue to portray plot or scenario. It is an incredible accomplishment for any movie to aspire to. Up was a non-traditional bonding adventure with great characters and a satisfying conclusion. You stated Up and Wall-E are "shit" and "mediocre". I suggest you make an appointment with a counselor. There is something wrong with your ability to feel empathy.
Aug 10 - 01:27 PM
What? Incredibles and monsters Inc... more original than Up and Wall-e? Watchmen for families and however many movies Monsters Inc borrowed from are not original. That's not to say they're bad films (they're both great) but they're far from original.
Oh, and as far as I'm concerned Wall-E and Up are both on par with those films, although I agree that Cars and Brave were terrible.
Jun 9 - 11:15 PM
I'm assuming the only reason Disney is trying to play it safe with this one is to avoid another John Carter. They know that Cars 1 and 2 were kids movies, and that's why they're making this one. They know kids will see it. They're only trying to avoid losing a ton of money again, unfortunately.
Mar 14 - 08:48 PM
Pfft, I know lots of kids who love Cars and Cars 2. It's talking cars. It's awesome. And the short Planes is based on is pretty funny too.
Mar 14 - 03:44 PM
Incredibles 2 would be interesting, but the first movie wrapped up nicely. I don't think there is a necessity for a sequel aside from the want of fans to see more of their favorite characters. Instead of a sequel, I'd rather another original film be released.
Aug 10 - 01:29 PM
This is absolutely pathetic. I thought Cars was extremely overrated and now I'm convinced that Disney is completely out of ideas. I mean Dane Cook? Really?! I thought he was done with show business and I was happy and content.
Mar 14 - 01:44 PM
I though Cars at least had some Pixar heart in it. Disney is just abusing creative power here.
Mar 14 - 01:38 PM
I am really dissapointed with Pixar on this! they are more creative than this!!
Mar 12 - 08:15 AM
absolutely agree, they are completely capable of some of the most innovative and original ideas of the past 3 decades, and unfortunately all this does is reinforce the notion that when push comes to shove.....the dollars win every time
Mar 14 - 09:24 PM
3 decades really..? lol.. tere first film was in 1995 Toy story.. not three decades... I think u need to give Disney a bit more credit who started everything and has probably 100 different recognizable characters and movies. way more then any other
Aug 2 - 09:00 AM
"Disney" is not a person. Disney is a corporation that changes with executives, trends and whims. The Disney that created many of the recognizable characters you mention is not the Disney that exists today. When Michael mentioned the Disney of the last three decades he was cognizant of this fact. The path the contemporary Disney has been walking has been shameful, exploitative, generic and face-palmingly stupid. The Disney of the fifties, the Disney I am assuming you most identify with, no longer operates. The current Disney cashes in on your nostalgia without a second thought and without justifying its copyrights by continuing to produce garbage.
Aug 10 - 01:34 PM
the thing is, it's not pixar this time, it's disney. it means it won't even have the same approach as a pixar movie
Mar 16 - 04:31 PM
Disney owns Pixar. They always work together on all of their movies. while this doesn't have the Pixar name, it has John Lasiter who is the head of both Pixar and Disney Animation Studios. In that sense they are the same
Aug 2 - 08:57 AM
PIXAR's films:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Pixar_films
DISNEY TOON STUDIO's films (the company that made this movie): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_Toon_Studios#Filmography
Just because two companies are owned by the same parent does not make them the same. John Lasseter is only credited as an executive producer on the film, which is nothing more than an honorable mention. Do some bloody research next time.
Aug 8 - 07:46 PM
Nadeem Ahamed
Message to DISNEY. Come up with better ideas. Naming a tablet SKYPAD doesn't help.
Sep 29 - 02:05 AM