Given his filmography of stylized thrillers, Scottish director Paul McGuigan (Gangster No. 1, Wicker Park, Lucky Number Slevin) seemed a fitting choice to helm this month's supernatural actioner Push, a Hong Kong-set sci-fi adventure about normal people endowed with super powers starring Chris Evans, Dakota Fanning, and Djimon Hounsou. Accordingly, one may be taken aback to hear that McGuigan names romantic auteur Wong Kar-Wai among his favorite directorial influences, but as he demonstrates in Push -- which captures the vibrant streets of Hong Kong in lush detail, appropriately -- McGuigan possesses a strong visual finesse that belies his history of making brutal crime movies and Hollywood suspense flicks.
McGuigan shared his Five Favorite Films with Rotten Tomatoes, which range from the above mentioned work of Wong Kar-Wai to UK family classics to the edgy work of Darren Aronofsky and beyond. Read on to discover the films most loved by Paul McGuigan, and learn what Hitchockian backstory he's developing into a feature film.
In the Mood for Love (2001, 88% Tomatometer)
It's such a beautiful cinematic poem, I suppose. When I did Push in Hong Kong, it was a great pleasure to be able to shoot the film almost in the style of Wong Kar-Wai --- just with him in mind, you know. Beautiful light, reds and greens. I actually stayed in one of the apartments in Hong Kong that he designed, which was nice. Lots of wallpaper. As a movie, you're just so compelled by these two characters, and he only shows glimpses of them, yet they're so compelling -- which is a feat in itself.
Have you taken any cues from Wong Kar-Wai in your overall directorial style?
I'd like to think so. I would never compare myself to Wong Kar-Wai --- that would be silly, that would be like comparing yourself to David Beckham. But I would like to make more work that has the kind of silence that he has, you know?
Push isn't quite that quiet film, is it?
Push is really loud. There's not much silence in Push. [Laughs] It's a pretty cool movie; it's not going to stretch you intellectually, but it's definitely going to make you have some fun at the cinema. In a way, that's as much a part of what I do as anything; just to entertain people. It was great for me to do something like this. I mean, imagine going to work and talking about f***ing floating guns, you know?
Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (1968, 59% Tomatometer)
My second favorite film is probably even more intellectually challenging than Wong Kar-Wai; it's Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. I f***ing love that movie! I have two children; I've probably seen this movie, with each child, about 50 times each. And that's no exaggeration. There's nothing I don't know about this movie. I once went to a meeting with an executive in Hollywood, and they asked me what I wanted to do. I said, 'I'd love to do a remake of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang' --- I was just making it up --- 'and I'd call it Chitty Chitty Bang Bang Boom,' and he said that's a great title! [Laughs] I was only kidding. But that's a movie I really love.
In the UK at Christmastime, the girls would get The Sound of Music and the boys would get Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. It was that kind of thing, where every Christmas you would see it. So when I had kids, of course I put it on for my son and then he became obsessed with it. It's the kind of movie where you never really get to the end; it's so long, and the kids can only really wait so long. But the beginning of the film is like 20 minutes long, before anything even happens. It's just the story of the car. It's fantastic!
The Man in the White Suit (1951, 100% Tomatometer)
Alex Guinness, to me is -- forget De Niro, forget Pacino --- he's the man. Alec Guinness is such a quintessential English actor, but he's also a brilliant actor. He's just the best. And The Man in the White Suit is just such a beautiful, charming movie. It's about a man who invents a suit that you don't have to wash. It's a whole movie about it! It's something that some of the more flamboyant directors should think about remaking. [Laughs] It's about this guy who invents this material that keeps white all the time. It's directed by Alexander Mackendrick, a fellow Scot, and the opening title sequence is amazing. Mackendrick is a brilliant director. I just enjoy his work; I enjoy the pace of his work. I think he's really overlooked. He did The Ladykillers and Whisky Galore, and The Sweet Smell of Success. A lot of really cool movies.
Alec Guinness, to me --- forget Star Wars and all that --- he's just the best. And to work with someone like Alexander Mackendrick, who really understood what a story meant...it's funny, because on IMDB the movie is listed as sci-fi. It's not sci-fi, that's ridiculous! It's actually a very nice tale, about inventing the thing that nobody wants. Like a car that doesn't need petrol. The thing that people don't want because of the money [the auto industry] could make off of you. If you say hey great, I've invented this car that doesn't need petrol, and then there's a silence, and then there's a gunshot, and you're dead. It's that kind of thing.
Rear Window (1954, 100% Tomatometer)
I loved making documentaries for that very reason; you just watch people, even after you've shot it. You go back to the edit suite and watch them, and you can understand when they're telling the truth and when they're lying. You get to know that stuff. It's really fascinating -- the idea that you can have a movie about something that might have happened... it's a trick of the eye, or using the camera in a fascinating way. You're using it to tell a story based on intrigue, and I don't think I've seen that before, or since.
Requiem for a Dream (2000, 78% Tomatometer)
Requiem for a Dream is a really interesting film. It changed my idea of what people really wanted to see. Because I came from the UK, as a European film director, it was interesting to see how American studios or financiers were really into European cinema. They would always quote certain movies that I made that nobody else had seen -- like Gangster No. 1. I was amazed, like, 'Wow, you've actually seen that movie?' And it dawned on me that people in America aren't that dumb after all, you know? They're kind of smart --- much smarter than I was about movies. And when I saw Requiem for a Dream, I understood it. This guy got cash, he got money, to make this movie. It's quite a hard movie to actually sell --- can you imagine trying to sell that movie? And for that alone I think Aronofsky is a genius. I like what he does. I even liked The Fountain. The Wrestler is a great movie; I think Pi is a genius piece of work. I think he deserves a lot of praise.
For people like me, who come from Europe and go to America and think nobody's going to know what I've done, I'm a struggling filmmaker, and then suddenly you go into a studio and the head exec is like, 'Gangster No. 1, I loved that film, it had this and that person in it...' They see everything. I was quite cheered by that.
Push opens in wide release February 6, 2009. Click here for a full synopsis, photo gallery and trailers.
Want more Five Favorite Films? Check out previous installments with Ernest Borgnine, Mickey Rourke, Danny Boyle, and James Franco.
Related Items
| Celeb: | Alfred Hitchcock |
| Djimon Hounsou | |
| Kar-Wai Wong | |
| Darren Aronofsky | |
| Paul McGuigan | |
| Chris Evans | |
| Dakota Fanning |
|
oddjob323 writes: on Jan 27 2009 05:58 PM I'm surprised he didn't say Jumper. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg1138 writes: on Jan 27 2009 06:25 PM Meh. I just summed up his career. "Rear Window" is great, I'm not so sure about "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang". I have no interest in "Push". (Reply to this) |
|
arendr writes: on Jan 27 2009 06:37 PM A movie about Robert Capa, eh? I wouldn't exactly call that a "Hitchcockian backstory" since Capa is one of the most influential photojournalists of all time, but okay. (Reply to this) |
|
gneah3 writes: on Jan 27 2009 06:38 PM thats an awesome list. (Reply to this) |
|
meinink2y writes: on Jan 27 2009 06:47 PM He EVEN liked The Fountain? That pisses me off; such a great movie doesn't deserve to EVEN be liked. It deserves to be loved because it's one of the best movies ever made. (Reply to this) |
|
cubitfox writes: on Jan 27 2009 07:21 PM He's kind of a moron, and a little bit unoriginal. Yeah, people have heard of Requiem for a Dream. not a big deal. not a whole of people, but people none the less. when you go into the movie industry, people usually know a lot about movies. he probably thinks no has heard of trainspotting or fear and loathing in las vegas. (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Jan 27 2009 08:04 PM Come on guys don't bash his list, it has Rear Window! I do think Push looks bad though and this years Jumper and I will probably rent it- maybe it will surprise me like Lucky Number Slevin which was kind of good. Though Push will probably suck. (Reply to this) |
|
Tyler Foster writes: on Jan 27 2009 08:11 PM In reply to this comment (#2287144) He was saying he was surprised that people had heard of his film Gangster No. 1, not Requiem For a Dream. (Reply to this) |
|
doc.grizzly writes: on Jan 27 2009 08:26 PM Man, Push is the only movie sense Tropic Thunder that I'm willing to throw down $8 to $10 dollars to see. To me, it looks like a sleeper hit. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Jan 27 2009 09:22 PM Jen, I'm sorry you had to see Push. This guy couldn't direct himself out of a paper bag. He panders to the lowest common denominator of an audience, mostly borderline personality/mildly retarted adolescent males. The trailer for Push was one of the most Stupid things I've seen in a good long time. I'm very sad, also, that Djimon Hansou is in this film. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Jan 27 2009 09:24 PM Oh, the fact he picked Wong Kar-Wai annoyed me, but the fact he has taken cues from him made me laugh out loud. They're totally opposite directors. . . (Reply to this) |
|
Alex Mang writes: on Jan 27 2009 09:58 PM "And it dawned on me that people in America aren't that dumb after all, you know? They're kind of smart" Gee, thanks. (Reply to this) |
|
nathanpoitras writes: on Jan 27 2009 10:06 PM Nice call on Rear Window! (Reply to this) |
|
StefansZ writes: on Jan 27 2009 10:37 PM I can't really agree with Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, but Rear Window is definitely a great choice. (Reply to this) |
|
KingSigy writes: on Jan 27 2009 11:37 PM Wow, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. That movie was pretty dumb. Wong Kar-Wai is always a good choice, though. (Reply to this) |
|
Jatin p. writes: on Jan 28 2009 12:18 AM hi (Reply to this) |
|
Bulletproof_Animal writes: on Jan 28 2009 12:36 AM Forget Star Wars and all that? You can p!ss right off, mate. Just for that I'm not going to see your X-Men/Jumper rip-off. (Reply to this) |
|
~*Admiral Snowstorm*~ writes: on Jan 28 2009 04:54 AM Well, I was hugely impressed that he picked a Wong Kar-Wai movie, and then hugely disappointed that he picked an Aronofsky movie. Oh well. I am impressed it's not just Star Wars and The Godfather and Casablanca and other dull choices, though. Rear Window's mention makes me pretty happy. I guess my interest in Push just rose a degree or two, though I still don't expect to pay to see it in theaters. Honestly, if the guy likes Wong Kar-Wai's style so much, I can't understand what compelled him to make Push. (Reply to this) |
|
Dizzle Sizzle writes: on Jan 28 2009 07:51 AM I personally dislike/hate all of his movies, so it doesn't surprise me that Push looks equally as terrible an unoriginal, and that his list is far from impressive. (Reply to this) |
|
justjohn writes: on Jan 28 2009 08:36 AM When he was talking about Americans being smarter than he thought they would be he was referring to their movie iq's, and how much people know about the movies these days. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |
















