Critical Consensus: "Rebound" Misses, "War of the Worlds" Hits
This week's wide releases are both tales of people looking adversity square in the face, and becoming better for it. The adversity in question comes in the form of alien invaders and bad junior high round-ballers. Will "War of the Worlds" impress critics enough for them to forget, at least for awhile, Tom Cruise's relationship with Katie Holmes? Will "Rebound" hit the last-second shot?
With the possible exception of Alfred Hitchcock, Steven Spielberg is responsible for more iconographic images than virtually any other director. And his skills for realizing the fantastic have not diminished in his latest, "War of the Worlds," currently at 72 percent on the Tomatometer. Critics have praised his take on H.G. Wells' classic tale of alien invasion for its astonishing special effects, and Tom Cruise, Dakota Fanning and Tim Robbins have received kudos for their performances. But some have said the film loses some of its potency with a pat ending.
Here's a brain teaser for all you movie lovers out there: can a ragtag, ragamuffin, seemingly inept bunch, led by someone seeking personal redemption, overcome the odds to triumph over adversity and learn something about themselves in the process? I didn't think so either, until I saw "The Dirty Dozen," "The Bad News Bears," "Dodgeball," "The Mighty Ducks," and pretty much every other movie ever made. Now comes "Rebound," which the critics are enjoying about as much as a flying elbow from Charles Oakley. Although the film is family-friendly, and should go over passably well with the lil' hoopsters in your family, the rest of the population will likely find it more predictable than Shaq missing his free throws. "Rebound" is currently at 14 percent on the Tomatometer.
Steven Spielberg's Tomatometer (as director, producer, and featured): 77 percent
Martin Lawrence's Tomatometer: 32 percent
With the possible exception of Alfred Hitchcock, Steven Spielberg is responsible for more iconographic images than virtually any other director. And his skills for realizing the fantastic have not diminished in his latest, "War of the Worlds," currently at 72 percent on the Tomatometer. Critics have praised his take on H.G. Wells' classic tale of alien invasion for its astonishing special effects, and Tom Cruise, Dakota Fanning and Tim Robbins have received kudos for their performances. But some have said the film loses some of its potency with a pat ending.
Here's a brain teaser for all you movie lovers out there: can a ragtag, ragamuffin, seemingly inept bunch, led by someone seeking personal redemption, overcome the odds to triumph over adversity and learn something about themselves in the process? I didn't think so either, until I saw "The Dirty Dozen," "The Bad News Bears," "Dodgeball," "The Mighty Ducks," and pretty much every other movie ever made. Now comes "Rebound," which the critics are enjoying about as much as a flying elbow from Charles Oakley. Although the film is family-friendly, and should go over passably well with the lil' hoopsters in your family, the rest of the population will likely find it more predictable than Shaq missing his free throws. "Rebound" is currently at 14 percent on the Tomatometer.
Steven Spielberg's Tomatometer (as director, producer, and featured): 77 percent
Martin Lawrence's Tomatometer: 32 percent
Related Items
|
poedude writes: on Jun 30 2005 04:17 PM war of the worlds == great movie! bang up job! in many ways, the flick is extremely faithful to Well's book! bravo spielberg! bravo! free weird www (Reply to this) |
|
CrazyGhost78 writes: on Jun 30 2005 04:40 PM Martin Lawrence is incredibly unfunny, but I can't wait to see War of the Worlds. Been waiting for it for a while, it looks awesome. (Reply to this) |
|
r_curl04 writes: on Jun 30 2005 08:31 PM i loved war of the worlds. honestly i was at the edge of my seat. my mouth was like wide open for most of it to. until my friend was staring at me telling me to keep it closed. i even whispered to myself. U no the "oh my god", or "no f'n way" (Reply to this) |
|
Benonymous writes: on Oct 17 2006 03:07 AM [b]It's unbeleivable[/b] I cannot believe anyone actually liked this film! It's AWFUL! H.G Wells would be rolling in his grave. Most people say the movie starts strongly. I disagree. it starts of badly and gets worse from there. Cruise gives us nothing. He scowls his way through the initial crisis, telling his chidren nothing, explaining nothing. Speilberg joins in with this lack of narrative as the film clunks it's way through a massive alien invasion. Over and over again scenes are urealistic and cliche'. When Cruise starts "becoming a real Dad" the scenes are overdone and unreal. My wife and I had a bet when we were watching it. It was during the scene where the dipshit son "has to see this!!!" and they part ways. We bet that he'd make it to Boston. Sure enough. After Cruise and his brood arrive safely at the almost untouched town house of the parents. Oh It's a MIRACLE!! the son appears. The unpleasant Stepfather appears to be absent though. What the HELL is Speilberg on?? The original story is a soaring epic of human survival and Speilberg reduces it to soap opera. He's a schmuck and so is Cruise. The script writers and the editor should be kicked out of the movie business and yet.... a shitload of people ponied up over 500mil to see this. I despair. bring on the aliens, put us out of our ignorance. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |



