Critic Review - Chicago Sun-Times

Marvelous!

January 1, 2000 Full Review Source: Chicago Sun-Times | Comments (13)
Chicago Sun-Times
Top Critic IconTop Critic

Comments

rockwhite666

David Voss

He gave it a 4/4, not a 3/4.

Nov 11 - 06:22 PM

CoUcH ToMaToE DoUgIe

Shawn Amoroso

if this is marvelous, then what are the two previous FAR superior films? what the best movies ever, nope. sorry, roger is wrong. it's... OKAY;)

Dec 11 - 08:13 PM

Nincommook

Michael Nautyorbiznes

Nobody is "wrong" when it comes to movies, pal.

Jul 4 - 02:02 PM

HypeWaive487

Ernie Truman

Yes, they are two of the best films ever made. Especially "The Empire Strikes Back."

Sep 19 - 03:34 AM

Alex Carawan

Alex Carawan

So many people have jumped on the Empire Strikes Back bandwagon... Episode V had the worst pacing, at least regarding action scenes, of all the Star Wars movies.

Dec 6 - 06:00 PM

Kassem Jaber

Kassem Jaber

That pacing was to establish tone and emotion dumbass

Jul 10 - 08:10 AM

Some guy you dont know

Bruce Campbell

Jan 12 - 01:07 PM

A55 Velcro

Bob Bobertson

"the Force--that in encompassing everything may, perhaps, encompass nothing, and conceal another level above, or beneath. I'm guessing that will be the subject of the next trilogy."

nope sorry it's all just bacteria in the bloodstream

Oct 23 - 01:04 AM

Dave M.

Dave Mart

From Wookieepedia, the SWWiki: "A misconception exists that rather than being indicators, midi-chlorians actually are the Force or create it; there is no canonical basis for this belief (...) George Lucas, on the other hand, considers the two aspects of the Force separately, treating the midi-chlorians as the practical, biological side, distinct from the spiritual and metaphysical side of the Force"; source: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Midi-chlorian

PS: therefore, it is not a "bacteria", it is the communion of organic life as a total; please don't be stupid.

Nov 21 - 07:40 AM

Alex Carawan

Alex Carawan

Please don't respond to a sense of humor with such seriousness. It's a real downer.

Dec 6 - 06:02 PM

Dave M.

Dave Mart

Please don't be stupid again.

May 26 - 08:46 AM

HypeWaive487

Ernie Truman

I disagree with the opinion that Han Solo is not very interesting as a person. If not for him, the movie would lose its humanity and become another self indulgent exercise in cardboard cut-out archetypes. He grounds the movie. After all, what is missing between this classic trilogy and the latter, merely "entertaining" trilogy? Han Solo. I agree that the overall idea of the movies overshadow his character, but he makes the movies fun, and that's why this saga has so many fans. Because it is fun. As an archetype or idea, he is not very interesting when compared with Vader, Yoda, or Kenobi. He is the most interesting person in the movie though and the reason we don't lose sight of the movies overall vision.

Sep 19 - 03:51 AM

Satchit Nagpal

Satchit Nagpal

its a 4-star! DAmn RT!

Aug 26 - 12:06 PM

Find us on:                     
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile