Average Rating: 5.4/10
Reviews Counted: 91
Fresh: 41 | Rotten: 50
With its forgettable songs and lackluster story, this new Pan will surely entertain kids, but will feel more like a retread to adults.
Average Rating: 6.3/10
Critic Reviews: 22
Fresh: 15 | Rotten: 7
With its forgettable songs and lackluster story, this new Pan will surely entertain kids, but will feel more like a retread to adults.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.1/5
User Ratings: 18,209
Almost 50 years after Walt Disney brought James M. Barrie's classic children's tale Peter Pan to the screen in one of the best-loved animated features, the studio that bears his name revisits the story of the magical boy who doesn't grow up in this sequel. In London during World War II, Wendy (voice of Kath Soucie) comforts her children with stories about her youthful adventures with Peter Pan (voice of Blayne Weaver) in the fantastic world of Neverland. Young Danny (voice of Andrew McDonough)
G, 1 hr. 12 min.
Action & Adventure, Animation, Kids & Family, Science Fiction & Fantasy
Feb 15, 2002 Wide
Aug 20, 2002
$48.3M
Walt Disney Pictures
All Critics (100) | Top Critics (24) | Fresh (45) | Rotten (52) | DVD (27)
Offers enough playful fun to entertain the preschool set while embracing a wholesome attitude.
Children will enjoy Never Land for its adventure and physical humor. Adults may simply like strolling down memory lane.
If you've got a house full of tots -- don't worry, this will be on video long before they grow up and you can wait till then.
A brisk, reverent, and subtly different sequel.
The boy who wouldn't grow up comes off like a shrill, obnoxious little drip.
Though the characters may connect as nostalgia for boomer parents, their kiddies will wonder what all the fuss was about.
Pleasant but forgettable sequel to Disney classic.
Suficientemente divertido e com toques certos de drama para não manchar a memória do original.
It's not groundbreaking, but kids who enjoyed the original Peter Pan should welcome a trip back to Neverland
...a lukewarm, watered-down recounting of everything we've seen before. (Pixie-Powered Edition)
There is no doubt the movie is lovely to look at; it just hasn't much substance to it or much new to say.
the animation and storyline are at least as strong, and possibly even stronger than the original Peter Pan
The first fifteen minutes are so unremittingly dreary that it plays like Disney for depressive kids. Pass the kiddies' Prozac, I say . . .
Running at a brisk 72 minutes, it's near impossible to become bored with the film...
Buzz, Shrek, Sully and Mike can sleep easy.
This film looks like it was produced in 1954, shelved for 48 years, and repackaged for a 2002 audience.
The film is fun, energetic, and brightly colored and I think kids will love it a lot.
not worthy of being a disney sequel
May 31, 2011Super Reviewer
Didn't need to be made, no point to it.
March 28, 2011
Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures