Goddammit! Jack & Jill had Al Pacino, that makes it a horrible loser!!! I wager nobody will remember Bucky Larson in two years, but everyone will see Pacino as the stars of both the best and worst films ever made!!!
"be in better movies"? He writes, produces, and stars in these pieces of shit! They're all his choice! You're talking as if his manager is shoving these horrible scripts down his throat. lol
I have to vote for Jack and Jill. I think its important to let Sandler know that, while he still has potential, he needs to drop this shit. Granted, his new film (Thats My Boy or something) looks like a return to form, but i think seeing his film on the Razzies as the people's choice might help him. The rest of them are too far gone or so Holloywood they dont care.
I agree. Adam Sandler is a no talent hack. He's in direct charge of exactly what movies get made, and the sad part is, people flock to go see them. Long as his turd movies make $$$, Adam Sandler will never die.
I would disagree that he's talentless. He was great on SNL and offered a very good turn in Paul Thomas Anderson's "Punch-Drunk Love." Moral of the story? He's a terrible filmmaker, yes. But he's an actor, somewhere deep down in there, who no longer gives two squirts about the movies he makes.
Hey, I'm a retarded fanboy and I HATED Transformers: Dark of the Moon. If it weren't for my loathing of all things Twilight (even though I've only seen the first one), I would've definately voted for TF3. I didn't see any of the others.
I completely agree... I voted NO, on the shiny gay vampires against hyper muscled gay doggies. Sorry if it hurts anyone, but I don't recall ever seeing any film this bad... EVER!
To me, Transformers shares the same case as Avatar; through the bad writing and meh acting, it at least had the benefit of eye-candy CGI (the same can't be said for Twilight, though). I'd say the 'deserved' hatred should go to worse material devoid of any positives... like that shit-on-a-stick Bucky Larson 'film'.
Whoops, I actually didn't mean to type that last "again". No, I haven't seen it. Just seeing the trailers is enough to convince me not to see it. Ever.
And thanks, I too agree he's the best Avenger. I can't wait for The Avengers to come out.
I totally hate Twilight but my vote went to Bucky Larson. I'm being reasonable and am not ashamed to admit that Twilight and Transformers are not the worst offerings on the market(even though they're bad in general). Had to think for a bit between Jack and Jill and Bucky Larson though.
yes my point exactly ... i mean most of these other films are bad too in my opinion except Transformers .. i feel like Transformers is overly hated on .. its no academy award worthy film but i cant say that it isn't good summer sci-fi madness. honestly in my own opinion transformers shouldn't be on the razzies listings, but shouldn't be nominated in any academy category unless its a visual effects or sound effects category.
There's no reason to pick on Bucky Larson. It has suffered enough as practically no one saw it. While Twilight continues to cause suffering as it inflicts its painful mediocrity on millions of our friends, family, and loves ones.
But I did see it. It left me miserable and delevoped cinemaphobia for nearly a week. But maybe you're right suggesting that Twilight has long lasting affect.
My hope is that we someday live in a world where Let Me In is the film of choice. Sorry Bucky hurt you. The scene where the crazy-earnest Christina Ricci cuts off the tip of a straw to be used as a condom suddenly flashed through my mind and I let out a cathartic laugh. That movie doesn't traumatize me.
Can't get ANYTHING good from Twilight, where the cast looks like they just got high after being trapped in a cave for a few days and then learned their cat got run over!
Spoiler alert on Twilight then. I can summarize the Twilight saga for the uninitiated: "I love you." "But I'm a vampire" "I Love you." "But I'm a vampire" "I love you." "Okay, I love you too-- no, wait I'm a vampire!" "Well then, I love HIM" "But he's a werewolf" "But I love him" "But he's a werewolf" ad infinitum ad nauseaum. A good genre bender would be Twilight in Jersey Shore. Who doesn't want to see Snooki get a stake in the heart?
It was absolutely terrible. In advance, i'd like to say this movie was ridiculous, but that's the best one to describe this masterpiece. Of course one would expect that a story about 30 m high robots is a little bit ridiculous, but it was really over the top. After things started going, there wasn't a single minute in the film where something utterly ridiculous did not happen. So many examples.OK, let's be fair to this movie. The special effects were great -- assuming you can suspend your belief in physics long enough to enjoy them. The rest of this movie was awful. It's sad to see so much of Hollywood's money go to tripe like this. There must be better things to fund.
Suspend disbelief? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this a movie about transforming robots from outer space? Every single minute of this movie should be unrealistic "ridiculousness" because......... its a movie about robots from outer space! Geez, ppl complain about stupid stuff.... Complain about the horrible acting, the nonsensical story, or Michael Bay rewriting history, not the fact that you have to "suspend disbelief", its a movie, a fictional one...... Next time mention the reasons why YOU think the movie is so horrible, rather than say "so many examples", and "ridiculous", over and over again. I would assume if you're watching the 3rd installment, you probably saw the atrocity that was the 2nd transformers movie, and expectations would be low to begin with. I mean, come on, same director, same producers, same cast (save megan fox), what did you think was going to happen??? You'd get a different movie???
Chris Miele
I cant decide between Bucky Larson or Jack and Jill...
Mar 12 - 11:23 AM
Steven Scott
I can't argue with that!
Mar 12 - 01:28 PM
Eugene Schreck
I agree but I voted Jack & Jill
Mar 14 - 06:22 PM
Michael Guglielmi
I'd go with Jack and Jill. Adam Sandler seemed to care less about that movie
Mar 14 - 11:19 PM
Dave Mart
Goddammit! Jack & Jill had Al Pacino, that makes it a horrible loser!!! I wager nobody will remember Bucky Larson in two years, but everyone will see Pacino as the stars of both the best and worst films ever made!!!
Mar 15 - 06:39 PM
Ryan Hibbett
Can't be Jack and Jill because I hear that Al Pacino isn't too bad. I'd go with Bucky Larson.
Mar 12 - 03:35 PM
otis malerbit
I would say Bucky Larson.
Mar 14 - 09:46 PM
Jesse Hornick
I'd say Bucky Larson. I think it's because I hate Nick Swardson so much...
Mar 21 - 01:29 PM
Brian Ramsey
Bucky Larson deserves to lose. Adam Sandler doesn't need to be in a movie, all he needs to do is be the writer/producer.
Mar 21 - 07:50 PM