Weekly Ketchup: Safe House Gets A Sequel

Plus, new roles for Renee Zellweger, Michael Fassbender, Zac Efron, and Vin Diesel.

The week after Labor Day was pretty much as slow for movie development news as the the week before the holiday was, except at least that one had 5 business days. The articles for this week's Ketchup had to be picked from a very limited pool, and probably about half of them never would have made the cut in most other weeks. These ten stories include a sequel to a movie no one expected a sequel to, and new roles for Vin Diesel, Zac Efron, Chris Evans, Michael Fassbender, Bruce Willis, and Renee Zellweger.


This Week's Top Story

WATCH OUT: SAFE HOUSE SURPRISINGLY SECURES A SEQUEL

Safe House, released this past February by Universal Pictures, was something of a surprise solid hit, especially in the USA, where it earned $126 million of its $202.5 million worldwide gross. That $202.5 million is a very respectable number, considering the film didn't have many of the usual traits of a box office hit these days (super heroes, special effects, kid/teen friendly CGI, etc.). $202.5 million is solid business, even if it's not as big of a number as the worldwide box office results for say, Battleship, Wrath of the Titans, John Carter, Dark Shadows, or American Reunion (the movies currently at #16-#20 on the 2012 chart, above Safe House at #21). What Safe House did have going for it was something quite old fashioned called "star power" in the form of Denzel Washington and (to a lesser degree) Ryan Reynolds. The original Safe House was written by David Guggenheim while he was a staff writer at Us Weekly magazine, and now Guggenheim has been hired to write a sequel (that might actually be a prequel) as well. Ryan Reynolds and Denzel Washington starred in the original Safe House as a young CIA agent and the rogue agent he has to keep in a Safe House in South Africa, respectively. As of this week, there's not yet any sequel/prequel deals for Reynolds or Washington.

Fresh Developments This Week

#1 ROGER EBERT'S LIFE ITSELF TO INSPIRE A DOCUMENTARY MOVIE, COMPLETING A THEMATIC CIRCLE

Although he was at one time considered just one half of a team with Chicago rival-turned-partner Gene Siskel, the last ten years has seen Roger Ebert really emerge as something of an elder spokesman within the film criticism community. Ebert's life also took an unexpectedly tragic yet inspiring turn when his battle with esophageal cancer led to the removal of much of his lower jaw. His autobiography, Life Itself, was published last year, which included many personal memories of his life and career, in addition to such bittersweet remembrances as a chapter about the menu at his favorite fast food franchise Steak 'n Shake. It was probably inevitable that Ebert's life become a movie, either sooner or later, and this week, we learned exactly how that will happen. Documentary filmmaker Steve James (Hoop Dreams, Stevie), assisted by producers Martin Scorsese and Steven Zaillian, has optioned the rights to Life Itself as the basis of a documentary about Roger Ebert's life. Ebert was contacted by the IndieWire site for comment about the project, and it sounds like he was surprised by the project, and doesn't know yet what the film will be like. Meanwhile, in other documentary news, the trailer was debuted this week for A Liar's Autobiography, an animated film from 17 different animation studios about the life of the late Monty Python member Graham Chapman. In addition to Chapman's own voice, the film also includes contributions from every other Python who isn't Eric Idle. Pythons who match that description include two Terrys (Jones and Gilliam), John Cleese and Michael Palin. If a documentary is ever made about Eric Idle's life, Graham Chapman is not expected to contribute.


#2 BRUCE WILLIS MAY MENTOR AN AMERICAN ASSASSIN

Bruce Willis is now in talks with CBS Films to costar in American Assassin, an adaptation of one of the novels in the "Mitch Rapp" series by author Vince Flynn. American Assassin is basically a prequel that explains how the fictional character of Mitch Rapp became one of the world's most legendary CIA agents, with Bruce Willis in talks to play Rapp's CIA agent mentor. Jeffrey Nachmanoff (Traitor) is attached to direct from a script adapted by Edward Zwick and Marshall Herskovitz, who previously worked together on Love and Other Drugs and The Last Samurai. Once Bruce Willis is confirmed as the older CIA agent, CBS Films will get started on actually casting the lead actor who will potentially carry the role on through adaptations of other books in the series.


#3 SIMON PEGG GAINS COSTARS IN BOTH THE WORLD'S END AND HECTOR...

A few more actors joined two different movies starring Simon Pegg this week, and one of them will be in both films. First up chronologically (filming-wise) will be The World's End, which finishes up the "Three Flavors Cornetto" trilogy that began with Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz. Paddy Considine (In America, The Bourne Ultimatum), who was also in Hot Fuzz, and Rosamund Pike (Wrath of the Titans, Die Another Day) will join Simon Pegg as 60% of the five friends reuniting for a pub crawl leading to the one called The World's End. After that film wraps up, Simon Pegg and Rosamund Pike will both continue on to the independent dramedy Hector and the Search for Happiness. Simon Pegg will play an eccentric psychiatrist who sets out on a search to determine if happiness actually exists, with Rosamund Pike playing his girlfriend, and Christopher Plummer playing a "Happiness Studies" professor at UCLA. Hector and the Search for Happiness will be directed by Peter Chelsom, whose previous comedies include Serendipity, Hannah Montana: The Movie, and the English language remake of Shall We Dance? Normally, Chelsom's RT Tomatometer scores would have landed that film in the Rotten Ideas, but it was saved by being lumped in with Edgar Wright's The World's End.


#4 MICHAEL FASSBENDER AND BILL WEASLEY STAR IN THE PAPIER-MACHE-CENTRIC BIOPIC FRANK

For as many British musical acts dominated the U.S. charts as well in the 1980s, it might seem surprising to learn of the ones that were only famous in their homeland. One such (novelty) act was Frank Sidebottom, who was actually a musician and comedian named Chris Sievey under a large papier mache head that vaguely resembled Pee Wee Herman (who debuted a few years before). Frank Sidebottom went on to host his own TV show in the early 1990s, but eventually he faded from British pop culture significance. And then, in 2010, Chris Sievey died from cancer at the age of 54, and it was discovered that he was penniless, which led to a large fundraising effort to at least give Frank Sidebottom a funeral. It's a sad story, and that's probably why it's being turned into a musical comedy biopic called Frank. Irish actor Domhnall Gleeson, who is most famous for playing Bill Weasley in the last two Harry Potter movies will play Chris Sievey himself, and Michael Fassbender will play the leader of the eccentric rock band Sievey belonged to before becoming Frank Sidebottom. Frank will be directed by Leonard Abrahamson of Ireland, whose first two films Adam & Paul and Garage didn't really make much of an impact in the USA.


#5 RENEE ZELLWEGER MAKING HER DIRECTORIAL DEBUT WITH 4 1/2 MINUTES

Actress Renee Zellweger is set to add another hyphenate to her credits with her directorial debut on the independent drama (about comedy) called 4 1/2 Minutes. Zellweger will also costar as the mother of a genius son for whom she hires a stand up comedian as sort of a male nanny, to be played by Johnny Knoxville. The script was written by Anthony Tambakis (cowriter of Warrior), and was based at least partly on the life of comedian Dov Davidoff. The movie will also be a look at the NYC stand up comedy community, and filming is scheduled to start there in February, 2013.




#6 IS CAPTAIN AMERICA IN AN "ANTI-ROMANTIC COMEDY" A MANY SPLINTERED THING?

Chris Evans (The Avengers) and Michelle Monaghan (Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, Source Code) will star in an independent "anti-romantic comedy" called A Many Splintered Thing. Director Justin Reardon will make his feature film debut working from a "Black List" screenplay by the team of Chris Shafer and Paul Vicknair. The comedy is described as being in the style of Amelie or (500) Days of Summer, which is fine if one ignores the fact that those films have almost nothing in common, except perhaps for traits that the two leading ladies in those films might share. Anyway, the story of A Many Splintered Thing involves a guy who starts a platonic relationship with an engaged woman that he met at a charity event while pretending to be a philanthropist. Consider this one a borderline "Fresh Development" aided mostly by the Black List distinction, and the fact that the director and writers don't have many other credits to help categorize this one.


#7 ZAC EFRON HAS AN INDIE ROMANTIC COMEDY AS WELL CALLED ARE WE OFFICIALLY DATING?

This must have just been a good week for young heart throb type actors to sign on for independent romantic comedies, "anti" or no. Zac Efron also signed on for one this past week called Are We Officially Dating? The story from debut director Tom Gormican follows three friends in Manhattan who make a pact to remain single just as they each start to fall in love.





Rotten Ideas of the Week

#2 VIN DIESEL WILL BE THE LAST WITCH HUNTER

This week saw the release of the first trailers for Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters, which made it somewhat coincidental and/or timely that this news story also broke this week. Vin Diesel is in talks with Lionsgate-Summit to star in a supernatural action movie called The Last Witch Hunter. Breck Eisner (Sahara, The Crazies) is attached to direct The Last WItch Hunter from a script by Priest screenwriter Cory Goodman. And that last part right there is why this is one of the week's Rotten Ideas. Anyway, The Last Witch Hunter is about, well, exactly what it sounds like... and it's set in modern day New York City, which is the opposite of new and refreshing.



#1 DISNEY IS JUMPING ON THE DYSTOPIAN BANDWAGON WITH MATCHED

Everything old is new again thanks to the burgeoning YA novel market, and its target audience's unawareness that much of what they're reading has already been done before, and often, a lot better. But alas, The Hunger Games and The Twilight Saga weren't box office bombs, and so here we are. Besides vampires and werewolves, these new books also often take place in dystopian futures and feature strong young female heroines. One such book was 2010's Matched by Ally Condie, which told the story of a girl in a dystopian future who rejects an arranged romance. Walt Disney Pictures has the rights to that book, and the trilogy that it will eventually become the first book of. This week, Disney chose director David Slade to direct Matched. Slade's previous two films were 30 Days of Night and The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, both of which were rated "Rotten" on the RT Tomatometer, and so, here we are.

For more Weekly Ketchup columns by Greg Dean Schmitz, check out the WK archive, and you can contact GDS via Facebook.

Comments

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Burying the lead a little, the best news this week is obviously the Graham Chapman documentary based on his own book "A Liar's Autobiography". This has been rumored to open at Cannes and Toronto Film Festival, so it's great to see that it actually exists and will be released eventually. And seriously, WTF Eric?

Not much else, as it was pointed out. Ebert wrote what may be the best known book on Scorsese's films which may be why he was eager to involve himself in a little payback. I don't have a lot of ill will for Ebert - he's certainly made me shake some fists in the past, like most critics - but I think a look at the balance of him and his relationship with Siskel would make a more interesting documentary.

Outside of that, I could take potshots at Zwick or Eisner or any of the rookies, but, blah. Do yourself a favor and watch some Chapman-centered Python this weekend instead. Silly.

Sep 7 - 06:04 PM

Gordon Franklin Terry Sr

Gordon Terry

The Safe House sequel is interesting-- at least in the sense as seeing whether or not Denzel Washinton appears in it (or not).//it will be great seeing old clips from Sneak Previews and At the Movies blown-up and projected onto The Big Screen for the Ebert documentary.// Vin Disel as Conquer Worm: Witchfinder General . . BOO. Vin Disel is no Vincent Price. We'll be seeing a fast, action-packed Witch-hunting movie that hopefully will rise above the subterranean levels of Steve Sommers' Van Helsing.

Sep 8 - 02:12 PM

Lance Reeder

Lance Reeder

Not sure how they could include Denzel who really made the first movie. Ryan Reynolds must give a mean BJ to keep securing these leading roles after so many notable failures and very few notable successes.

Sep 8 - 07:43 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I'm assuming the "prequel" aspect is how they can keep Denzel in the script.

Sep 8 - 07:55 PM

fdjsai i.

fdjsai iofdsa


welcome to: http://www.famalegoods.com

The website wholesale for many kinds of
fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,prada,****, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short time.


free shipping

competitive price

any size available

accept the paypal

http://www.mineokmalls.com

jordan shoes $32

nike shox $32

Christan Audigier bikini $23

Ed Hardy Bikini $23

Smful short_t-shirt_woman $15

ed hardy short_tank_woman $16

Sandal $32

christian louboutin $80

Sunglass $15

COACH_Necklace $27

handbag $33

AF tank woman $17

puma slipper woman $30

http://www.famalegoods.com

Sep 14 - 04:28 AM

Facebook User

Facebook User

Slow news week.... Yeah, that's all I got.

Sep 7 - 07:46 PM

Will Stamp

Will Stamp

I would say that 500 Days and Amelie have a fair amount in common, mainly their irritatingly self-conscious and cutesy tone.

Sep 7 - 09:01 PM

Kyle Tolan

Kyle Tolan

I made the instant connection when I saw 500 Days. Its really more about the use of many different film styles throughout the movies as well as the sort of classic narrative over not-so classic stories (not to mention the random backstory montages placed throughout each).

Sep 8 - 01:03 AM

CyborgUnicorn

Cyborg Unicorn

I'm not bagging on Ebert, but would an Ebert biopic really be that interesting?

Sep 7 - 10:14 PM

Stepping Razor

Stepping Razor

Well, seems like it's going to be a documentary, not a biopic. I had thought it was going to be a biopic, too.

Sep 8 - 10:28 AM

Dave Sivertsen

Dave Sivertsen

How are movies like Safehouse and Red getting sequels and the A-team is not!? Not only an amazing ensemble piece but it was also awesome at everything!!!

Sep 7 - 10:24 PM

Whereis Reemaal

Whereis Reemaal

A-Team was good? Really?

Sep 8 - 12:30 AM

Mohd Syafiq Bin Jabaruddin

Mohd Syafiq Bin Jabaruddin

Best action film of 2010.

Sep 8 - 10:38 PM

TheCriticAlex

Stanley Beans

The A-team was average at best nothing to write home about.

Sep 9 - 05:13 PM

CyborgUnicorn

Cyborg Unicorn

Vin Diesel needs a better agent

Sep 7 - 11:54 PM

CyborgUnicorn

Cyborg Unicorn

Really though the Fast movies are cool, and I'm waiting for Riddick 3, and I know he hasn't always been the best actor (as alright as XXX was he seemed kinda wooden at times and he wasn't even in the sequel! he left Fast too but he ended up coming back afterward) but I liked him in Boiler Room and Private Ryan. I think with the proper material and direction he can move between genres quite easily. However, he seems to have The Rock's agent or something because at least half the time these days he's in lame children's movies! He's wasting his talent. But that's just my opinion.

Sep 8 - 12:01 AM

CyborgUnicorn

Cyborg Unicorn

maybe I over-approximated his record as it relates exclusively to childrens movies but Pacifier stands for itself, and taking a lok at his upcoming, i see Riddick 3, Fast 6, XXX 3, aaand.. a movie about a kid finding a robot. Sort of sounds like Iron Giant Redux i guess, which is fine and all but come on!

Sep 8 - 12:07 AM

Stepping Razor

Stepping Razor

From the sounds of it, maybe he's doing it for the paycheck. As you said, he's not exactly the best of actors out there, and he's working within his range. Not every Hollywood actor (especially these days) is about his/her craft... they're about striking while the iron is hot. Maybe it just sounds fun to him, so he wants to have fun while also getting paid.

Sep 8 - 10:38 AM

CyborgUnicorn

Cyborg Unicorn

mm maybe so

Sep 8 - 03:38 PM

King  S.

King Simba

You can tell this is a slow week when the #1 fresh development is a documentary. Roger Ebert definitely deserves one though. He may disagree with the general opinion a lot of times, but he almost always manages to make get his point across (though The Prestige was an exception. I'm still not sure what bothered him about that film) and sometimes his reviews even make me appreciate a film more (Knowing was a prime example).

Really looking forward to The World's End. I liked Shaun of the Dead, while Hot Fuzz was one of the best buddy cop movies of all time, so I can't wait for the conclusion to the trilogy.

I actually think dystopian YA fiction has been a pretty solid genre. Regardless of whether or not they're very original, there have been quite a lot of well made novels in the genre, plus it's nice to see strong female characters being produced on such a consistant basis, something Hollywood is still having trouble with.

Regarding Matched, I'm actually reading it right now, though so far I haven't been very impressed with it. It's a little too heavy on the romance aspect, which wouldn't be a problem except like Twilight it doesn't give us much of a reason to care for the love triangle. Hopefully it starts to pick up later on because the first half has been pretty uneventful.

Sep 8 - 01:13 AM

Bigbrother

Big Brother

I didn't like The Prestige the first time I watched it and even now I only find it tolerably interesting. My main problems with it were despite the ridiculousness of the ending I totally saw "the twist" coming 30 minutes before it arrived. I mean of course the Jackman-centric twist. The Bale-centric one I saw about two hours before it happened. I mean honestly did no one recognize that both those characters were Christian Bale? For a movie largely based on it's surprise twist, those are pretty glaring flaws. Also, thought they buried the most interesting storyline. Thought the movie would have been better had it been based on the "Current Wars" between Tesla and Edison. The story of the two rival magicians is strong aside from the conclusion which is why I've come to mildly enjoy it and Bowie as Tesla is well worth the price of admission alone though sadly underused.

Sep 8 - 07:53 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I don't believe you. The second character you mentioned doesn't show up until halfway through the movie, so you could have figured it out an hour in at best.

Sep 8 - 08:03 PM

Joshua Caylor

Joshua Caylor

"The secret impresses no one.". Unfortunately, while that is true about illusions, usually those tricks are not given away at the end. The Prestige revealed the secret and it was a disappointment, as most truths behind illusions are. I personally find this film very well done and perfectly structured, dividing the three acts into the stages of an illusion (pledge, turn, prestige), but it disappoints after the prestige, when the trick is revealed (I don't mind the ending). Just because you guessed the ending doesn't make it a bad one, just as figuring out how an illusion is done does not make the illusion itself bad. I remember reading an interview where Christopher Nolan said he would have preferred if he didn't reveal the secret, but it seemed necessary.

Also, you can't blame the Nolans or the film for the simplicity of the illusion. Remember, this was an adaptation of a novel, and Christopher Priest was responsible for that element of this adaptation. I thought the film was well acted, well structured, and well directed. I don't fault the movie for its ending. "The secret impresses no one", but the illusion itself (the movie) is still worth the watch and can be quite entertaining. That's how I feel about "The Prestige."

Sep 8 - 11:07 PM

Bigbrother

Big Brother

Come on guys you're stretching pretty hard to defend Nolan here. I love the man too, but he's not above having flaws. The most obvious one for me was fully on display in The Prestige. He's way to deliberate in his approach to his endings. If The Sixth Sense would have been figured out half way thru it would have seriously detracted from the movie. If you knew who Kaiser Soze was half way thru The Usual Suspects it would have been been a detriment to the movie. Nolan was going for that and he failed I think for anyone who was paying attention. It wasn't that the ending was revealed and it was disappointing, it was that I figured out the disappointing ending and he didn't cover it up well enough and didn't come up with something better. I'm sorry if the illusion is easy to figure out then it's a bad illusion. I believe that was actually one of the points made in the movie. Janson, you caught me I was guilty of exaggeration, but the central point still remains valid. Lastly, I can't blame the director for faults I find in the direction of the film? That's a new one. He couldn't have gotten better make-up for Bale or made sure they never shared screentime? he couldn't have made the concious decision to change the ending to make it more adaptable for film. Again that's news to me. Directors do it all the time. As I said, I think you guys are trying very hard to cover for Nolan with excuses that basically come down to "you just don't get it" which is the go to response for the indefensible.

Sep 9 - 11:54 PM

Bigbrother

Big Brother

PS I agree with you about it being well acted and give Nolan and the cast full credit for the performance aspect of the direction. That's what makes it watchable for me now.

Sep 10 - 04:47 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I agree with your PS, BB. I thought it was a superbly well made movie in all respects. And for the record, I figured "Sixth Sense" out within about 15 minutes. I didn't even intend to. I just thought it was funny *spoiler* how we never saw Willis go to the hospital before we transistion into years later. I thought, "well, wouldn't that be something IF..." Then I started noticing that no one except the kid was talking to him. I thought, "Oh, no, I hope I'm wrong, that would be so lame". In the end, I don't hold it against the film. But I don't think it's anywhere near as masterful a movie as "Prestige".

Sep 10 - 07:02 PM

Flash T.

Flash T

Safehouse was awful, 80m it cost and it was bland, unimaginitive and worse of all perdictable. The only real twist is that some dull fucker green lit a sequel.

Sep 8 - 01:18 AM

Zach Wisz

Zach Wisz

Why is Roger Ebert so special? He's a film critic who hates some of the greatest movies ever made. I'd rather see a movie about Chuck Norris making a sandwich instead.

Sep 8 - 09:19 AM

Stepping Razor

Stepping Razor

I'm sure someone in Hollywood would oblige you on the Chuck Norris special, but I'm interested in seeing a documentary on Ebert. That you're basically calling Ebert a hater emphasizes that critical thinking is probably not your thing. There are plenty of mindless, dumb movies out there to scratch your itch.

Sep 8 - 10:31 AM

Zach Wisz

Zach Wisz

Oh well. If it's a documentary I guess I have no problem. If it was an actual FILM I'd be like, WTF?

Sep 8 - 08:13 PM

Cole Jaeger

Cole Jaeger

What? Clockwork Orange, Blue Velvet, To Kill A Mockingbird, that's about it. And the only one of those he HATED was Vlue Velvet.

Sep 8 - 10:43 AM

Dave J

Dave J

As you all probably know by now, Ebert hated "Blue Velvet" because of the humiliation of it's actress Isabelle Rosselini which some of those scenes didn't really have anything to do with the mystery itself! I originally liked the film because I was very young and liked to see some of my favorite actresses naked and so forth... but after reading about Lynch's reasons for showcasing some of those shocking scenes I decided that Ebert was right on the money!

Sep 10 - 12:35 PM

Dave J

Dave J

Actually, on a live telecast- he did change his opinion to a thumbs up on "A Clockwork Orange" but haven't submitted a proper rewritten review on it yet. At least as far as I know anyway!

Sep 10 - 04:22 PM

King  S.

King Simba

Everyone is bound to hate a few films that most people think are great. Besides, a lot of films that are now considered great weren't exactly very hotly recieved when they were first release. In fact, in cases like Blade Runner and Clockwork Orange he was just reflecting the general opinion of the time. In fact, there were actually some cases where he would give a film its due well before most other critics (2001 being a prime example. His original 4 star rating was one of a the rare raves the film recieved upon release).

Sep 8 - 12:52 PM

Michael Arnold

Michael Arnold

Chuck Norris doesn't make sandwhiches. He waits for them to materialize. They always do.

Sep 9 - 11:53 AM

greg_dean_schmitz

Greg Dean Schmitz

About the Ebert documentary, I think that one interesting take that could be incorporated could be the "mentor" position that he established with many of the new generation of Internet film writers in the 1990s and early 2000s. When UpcomingMovies.com was in its early years, it was a huge deal when I would be quoted in the Movie Answer Man column, or shared the stage with Roger at the EbertFest to talk about "Grave of the Fireflies." And I'm just one of probably dozens of writers who could tell similar stories.

Sep 8 - 12:15 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Ebert also has a reputation for engaging readers in discussion, including some RT members.

Sep 8 - 08:00 PM

Lance Reeder

Lance Reeder

Please anyone who's actually seen Priest, was it really that bad? I really enjoyed it and at the time it seemed to be buried by a tide of folks who had never seen it and assumed it was stupid based on synopsis'. Yes, it was a bit derivative of movie's like Mad Max, Blade Runner and Judge Dredd, but honestly there are worse things than being derivative of Mad Max and Blade Runner. I thought it was a really enjoyable action film with an interesting premise and elevated above its budget by Paul Bettany's leading role. Maybe I'm alone here, but there are about a dozen movie's in recent years that have come out with worse executions of this or similar premises.

Sep 8 - 07:41 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I thought it was an insightful examination of homosexuality in the Catholic Church. Oh, you mean the Bettany thing? Total POS. Sorry.

Sep 8 - 07:59 PM

Mitch Jones

Mitch Jones

I've seen the movie but I can't remember much about it except that I didn't enjoy it. It's mostly just forgettable to me, which is a shame because the cast was good and it's usually the type of movie I like.

Sep 8 - 08:32 PM

Bigbrother

Big Brother

Please expound you two. I seriously interested in figuring out how I had such a different take on the movie. It had it's flaws and is far from perfect, but I still enjoyed it and thought the action in particular was very well done especially on the budget it was given.

Sep 10 - 12:06 AM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Bad CGI, like video-game bad. I don't mind video games, but I hate movies that look like video-games, and the action also followed a video game's logic. And horrible dialogue.

Sep 10 - 07:05 PM

Mitch Jones

Mitch Jones

I'd have to watch it again to really explain because I seriously can't remember much of the plot to the movie. The premise of the movie was appealing and I've read a few of the comics so I was interested in the movie. I do remember the dialogue being pretty stale. If I can't remember much of the action so it must have been average at best.

Sep 10 - 07:51 PM

Frisby2007

Frisby 2007

Top News:

Yawnville

Fresh:

1. ...YAWN!!!!

2-7. Nothing interesting.

Rotten:

2. Still more Yawnville

1. This is rotten news, because?

Sep 8 - 07:44 PM

Mitch Jones

Mitch Jones

Maybe I'm missing something but nothing about 5, 6, or 7 sound all that fresh to me.

Sep 8 - 08:33 PM

greg_dean_schmitz

Greg Dean Schmitz

Well, there's no middle ground category. For movies that there's really little to judge a movie on... the other choice would be to call it Rotten. Which can sometimes be a little harsh, especially for newcomer directors, writers, etc.

Sep 9 - 06:11 PM

Spencer Kain

Spencer Kain

Safe Hiuse doesn't need a sequel the first was even that good.

Sep 8 - 09:25 PM

What's Hot On RT

Total Recall
Total Recall

Every Star Trek movie listed

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Star Trek is Certified Fresh

The Butler Trailer
The Butler Trailer

Forest Whitaker serves the White House

Captain Phillips
Captain Phillips

Trailer for Tom Hanks thriller

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile