RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
See Saw with Alex, Day 1: Saw
Exploring the legendary 2004 movie.
by Alex Vo | October 15, 2009
Discuss Article



Day One: Saw

Click. Stop. Movie's over. Just saw Saw and, you know what, I'm actually looking forward to these movies supposedly becoming terrible because Saw the first remains an involving, and somewhat exhausting, grimy mess. I now see the appeal on the annual Saw tradition, but watching them all over a few days? Damn it, my favorite movies are Rushmore and a French comedy from 1967! I got my work cut out for me.

(And if you couldn't tell, these Saw interpretations will be spoiler-filled!)

So like most horror movies that give way to ballooning franchises, Saw starts simple. Two men -- one a photographer, the other a doctor (co-writer Leigh Whannell and Cary Elwes, respectively) -- wake up in a decrepit bathroom, both chained by the leg in opposite corners. A bloody corpse on the floor separates them. The two reason they're being punished by Jigsaw for their moral transgressions, while Elwes' character learns he has eight hours to kill Whannell or they'll both die, not to mention his wife and kid.
It's a smart blueprint, easily adapted over and over: dream up a central location of terror, and then revolve outside characters around it, racing to find the victims and/or stop Jigsaw.

The main bathroom scenes are just one long pile drive of dread and internal turmoil, but similarly impressive is director James Wan's alacrity to mix shooting styles for locations elsewhere. He uses MTV-style quick cuts and fastfowards for flashbacks of  previous traps, like the barb-wire gauntlet and the bear trap jawsplitter (featuring Shawnee Smith, who I'm aware will play a big role in the series).

Meanwhile, when inside Elwes's home, Wan dabbles in classic horror. My favorite scene is the abduction of the wife and daughter, beginning with a slow pan over the daughter's bed, an unsettling shot placed in stark contrast to Saw's typically manic tone.
Then following that with an eye peeking through the closet and red herring killer Zepp (Michael Emerson) covered in a blanket? Vintage boogeyman cinema!

But as effective the movie as a whole was, if I were Cary Elwes, I'd be mortified with this being one of my most-seen performances outside The Princess Bride. Elwes's approach was like a thespian tackling a chamber play; obviously, the bulk of the action takes place in one room, but his grandiose movements and loud line delivery is more theatre than film. It reminded me a lot of Shelly Duvall's performance in The Shining -- blown-out hysteria that generated sympathy as much as it drew you out of the movie.

Also, after sawing his foot off, doesn't he look like Will Ferrell sucked dry by the mutant Land of the Lost mosquito?
As the movie barrels towards it conclusion, the bodies start piling: Detective Tapp (Danny Glover) gets shot in the chest (after having his throat slashed and, oh yeah, going crazy after his partner gets diced by multiple shotguns), Zepp is bludgeoned by a toilet tank cover, and Adam is left to die in the bathroom. All this leads to the movie's final twist: the corpse in the room was actually Jigsaw the whole time.

I'd like to point out the Jigsaw identity reveal is the first time we get to hear Charlie Clouser's Saw theme in full, a dramatic and rousing industrial theme that goes a long way in selling this plot twist. Just further proof if you want to get a horror series going, better nail down that song.
Body count: 7, including Elwes (c'mon, he is so dead)

Most inventive trap: The reverse bear trap. A bear trap's freaky enough, but then making it go backwards? All kinds of genius there.

Stupid person in a horror movie moment: Monica Potter wrestles the gun away from Zepp but then, rather than shooting him, tries to hold him at bay while talking on a phone and tending to her daughter. When has that ever worked?

See Saw schedule:
  • Day 1 (10/15): Saw (2004)
  • Day 2 (10/16): Saw II (2005)
  • Day 3 (10/19): Saw III (2006)
  • Day 4 (10/20): Saw IV (2007)
  • Day 5 (10/21): Saw V (2008)
  • Day 6 (10/23): Saw VI (2009)
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-20 of 44 posts) | Reply
Mr. Bo Ziffer
Mr. Bo Ziffer writes:
on Oct 15 2009 05:21 PM

Glad you liked the first one. I'm also glad that you mentioned that the stupid mother doesn't shoot the guy after all of that psycological torture. That bugged the heck out of me! As for the second one, it isn't TERRIBLE, but there is a definite decline in quality. Once you reach III through VI, you might see where all of the hate comes from.

(Reply to this)
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on Oct 15 2009 05:42 PM

Oh Vo, you're in for a painful ride.

I can't say I like this film, but I can say it's at least original. And 4,000,000 times better than and "Hostel" film. Plus, it works in making a creepy and disturbing atmosphere, and Jigsaw is certainly a evil enough villain. But, too grisly in violence, and to messy as a whole to enjoy. But great write up.


(Reply to this)
RT-Ryan
RT-Ryan writes:
on Oct 15 2009 05:51 PM

Makes me want a tricycle something fierce.

(Reply to this)
ledawg1138
ledawg1138 writes:
on Oct 15 2009 06:04 PM

In reply to this comment (#2553450)
"better than and Hostel film" ugh, serious brain ****.

(Reply to this)
rle4lunch
rle4lunch writes:
on Oct 15 2009 06:20 PM

Ledawg, gotta agree with the Hostel assessment, pure and utter sh.itfest there. So dumb, so dumb...

I think that the series declines thru 3, then sorta picks back up at 4 with the orgin story stuff, then starts to go shi.tty again after that.


(Reply to this)
rle4lunch
rle4lunch writes:
on Oct 15 2009 06:21 PM

^^^the Saw series that is^^^

(Reply to this)
bondfreak
bondfreak writes:
on Oct 15 2009 06:31 PM

first one was decent entertainment, now i wish you would just stop this madness so the rest of the series wont ruin your experience :p

(Reply to this)
King Kubrick
King Kubrick writes:
on Oct 15 2009 06:39 PM

I hated the first one. One of the stupidest twists ever. I'm going to lock myself in a room with a guy whose family I kidnapped and another guy who I also ****ed over. I'll give them each a saw and pray to god I don't sneeze in the whole ****ing ten hours I'm locked in there with them, cause if I do they're going to eviscerate me. What was jigsaws purpose in doing this? What did it accomplish? Sweet ****ing nothing is what. It was a stupid ploy to get a shock ending no one could have guessed because its unabashedly retarded in ever single aspect. Locking himself in with them benefits him in no way. IN NO WAY. I was shocked when I saw it first until a minute-literally a minute- afterward when I realized it was one of the stupidest things ever put on screen. I hate the whole franchise but I can tolerate the sequels a bit more because none of the twist present in those films sink to such a disgusting level of willful stupidity.

(Reply to this)
RT-Ryan
RT-Ryan writes:
on Oct 15 2009 06:43 PM

Tell us how you really feel, Kubrick.

(Reply to this)
King Kubrick
King Kubrick writes:
on Oct 15 2009 06:51 PM

In reply to this comment (#2553473)
you don't want to know what I really think. I was being polite just now.

(Reply to this)
fennis2000
fennis2000 writes:
on Oct 15 2009 06:51 PM

Hmmm.... I keep seeing the word "dumb" and "stupid" to describe the SAW movies on here, and I disagree. If anything, they seem too well thought out, too bulky in plot... and WAY too much flashback, backstory and blatant exposition. It's obvious they were ripping off SEVEN somewhat, and adding more gore and visual flashiness.
So while the films are flawed, I wouldn't call them mindless violence. There is a purpose to the killings, we get suitable character development and a nice story arc as the films go on.
The worst I believe to be part II, part III I enjoyed because they got rid of the annoying cops after the first 15 mins and concentrated on a good core story for a change: a man facing those responsible for the death of his son.
Not sure what all the venom on this site is about, obviously lots of people enjoy them... well-done popcorn movies that are about as subversive as commercial cinema gets nowadays.


(Reply to this)
Brian R.
Brian R. writes:
on Oct 15 2009 07:37 PM

After seeing SAW 6 times....I have these marathons once a year, but i watch 1 a week instead, I think that with the twist already known the first movie becomes one of the most boring. The point of these movies is to think like Jigsaw, which strangly enough is the focus of a later plot...Jigsaw technically doesn't murder anyone and all of his traps are completely win-able, you start to almost be like wow, ya know what this vigilante thing is kiinda workin. If you have ever seen The Shield or Dexter you know what I'm talking about...both shows involve crooked/murdering cops but you find urself rooting for them. I always thought Jigsaw was a bad guy but worse than a cheating husband who cares more about his job than his family..idk....The fun in these movies is finding out the mentality of Jigsaw, which requires more than 1 film and multiple awesome flashbacks...the first movie you have nooo clue who Jigsaw is or what his plan is...you find out later and knowing more about this criminal mastermind is why I enjoy the movies....i dont care if there is barely any blood (one film I found wayyyy less gorey) or oozing blood...the fun is the continuation of the story, which is something many horror films these days lack.

(Reply to this)
man in the water
man in the water writes:
on Oct 15 2009 07:37 PM

I for one immensely enjoyed Saw. It's the only Saw I've seen to date, and it had me on the edge of my seat, and the final twist made my jaw drop. This was my only Saw viewing, and I still remember the movie. Props to the crew behind this movie. Maybe I'll eventually check out the sequels, but this is actually a smart thriller. At least that's my two cents.

(Reply to this)
Steve R.
Steve R. writes:
on Oct 15 2009 07:59 PM

Cool analysis, but it was a little confusing when you switched between the actors' names instead of the characters.

(Reply to this)
Brian R.
Brian R. writes:
on Oct 15 2009 08:28 PM

NO SPOILERS:: Kubrik has a good point about the 1st movie...when i saw the 2nd I immediately thought it was better, then when I saw the 3rd I still thought the 2nd was better, but strangely now I would have to say the 2nd is the worst...mainly because i'm so used to the twist...Detective Mathews is going to rock ur socks tho, I remember cheering him on in the theater...

(Reply to this)
smi1ey
smi1ey writes:
on Oct 15 2009 08:35 PM

I was blown away by the ending in Saw 1... to the point of Sixth Sense proportions. I actually was entertained by the first movie. Because of this I saw the second. Haven't seen one since.

(Reply to this)
martinscorsese25
martinscorsese25 writes:
on Oct 15 2009 08:58 PM

Oh yeah... we get a "SEE SAW" but no "Tracking Tarantino".

As horrible as Death Proof is, i still prefer it than any Saw films.


(Reply to this)
Brian R.
Brian R. writes:
on Oct 15 2009 09:22 PM

Death proof has one of the best girl-power scenes of any movie and the last car chase is amazing....plus Stuntman Mike's turn from badass to crybaby is perfectly played and hillarious. The rest of the movie was horrible. I would watch SAW through SAW5 just in anticipation for the theme music.

(Reply to this)
arendr
arendr writes:
on Oct 15 2009 11:14 PM

Yikes, I would actually take any of the Saw movies over Death Proof, but only because they're so hilariously bad. Death Proof's long, drawn-out, boring as hell dialogue scenes make me wish Jigsaw would put a bear trap on my head.

(Reply to this)
Alex Vo
Alex Vo writes:
on Oct 15 2009 11:34 PM

In reply to this comment (#2553490)
I was also wondering if that'd get confusing.

Just finished Saw II. Actually had fun watching it believe or not, though still bracing for that steep drop in quality.

OK, something super geeky I picked up on in SAW II (SPOILERS!): I recognized the dripping water sound effect in the background at the end of the movie when Donnie Walhberg wakes up is the same sound effect used in the first Quake. Makes sense since both the Saw series composer and the sound designer for Quake are people involved with NIN.


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Saw
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • See Saw with Alex, Day 1: Saw (44)
  • Get Ready to See Saw with Alex (37)
  • Saw Director Cutting into Hellraiser Franchise? Opens in new window (0)
  • Charlie Sheen Getting Twisted in Next Film (17)
  • I Know Who Killed Me, Norbit, Daddy Day Camp Lead Razzie Noms (46)
  • Ending Already Written for Saw V (54)
  • Saw V Still On Track for 2008 (22)
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Halloween Strikes on the 31st (11)
  • RT-UK's What to Watch at the Edinburgh Film Festival (3)
  • Saw IV's First Five Minutes Are Online! (40)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (144)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (74)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (51)
  • Five Favorite Films with Werner Herzog (50)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (31)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (8)
  • Ho, ho, ho! It's RT's Great Big Gift Guide! (0)

Latest News

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (144)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (51)
  • Ho, ho, ho! It's RT's Great Big Gift Guide! (0)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (31)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (74)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)
  • Five Favorite Films with Werner Herzog (50)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (8)
  • RT on DVD & Blu-Ray: Star Trek, Bruno, and Cheaper Sopranos (32)

Latest Interviews

  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (8)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (6)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (15)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (16)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (8)
  • Wolverine Creator Len Wein Talks About the Film (28)
  • Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)
  • Duncan Jones talks Moon, Sam Rockwell, and Mute (14)
  • Emma Stone talks Zombieland - RT Interview (41)

Latest Features

  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • Five Favourite Films with Ang Lee (34)
  • 10 Movies That Changed The (End Of The) World (32)
  • Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (38)
  • 12 Facts About 2012 (135)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (16)
  • Five Favourite Films with 24's Carlos Bernard (33)
  • Six Horrible Part Sixes (32)
  • Christopher Smith's Favourite Cult Horror Films (14)
  • Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Games| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.