Opening

74% Fast & Furious 6 May 24
21% The Hangover Part III May 23
63% Epic May 24
96% Before Midnight May 24
86% We Steal Secrets: The Story Of Wikileaks May 24
82% Fill the Void May 24
17% A Green Story May 24
—— Alyce Kills May 24

Top Box Office

87% Star Trek Into Darkness $70.2M
78% Iron Man 3 $35.8M
50% The Great Gatsby $23.9M
46% Pain & Gain $3.2M
69% The Croods $3.0M
77% 42 $2.8M
55% Oblivion $2.3M
99% Mud $2.2M
36% Peeples $2.2M
8% The Big Wedding $1.2M

Coming Soon

—— After Earth May 31
—— Now You See Me May 31
100% The Kings of Summer May 31
89% The East May 31
Scream, Blacula, Scream!

Scream, Blacula, Scream! (1973)

tomatometer

No Reviews Yet...

Release Date: Jun 27, 1973 Limited

audience

43

liked it
Average Rating: 3/5
User Ratings: 2,065

My Rating

Movie Info

In this horror sequel from the director of Count Yorga, Vampire, a member of an American voodoo cult revives the fanged Prince Manuwalde (William Marshall), only to become his slave. Manuwalde then puts the bite on various victims, but finds himself fixating on pretty Lisa (Pam Grier), a voodoo princess whom he believes can finally put his soul to rest. Lynne Moody, Nicholas Worth, and Bernie Hamilton are among the familiar cast, but the various occult trappings seem somewhat out of place in the

Jan 20, 2004

MGM

Watch It Now

Cast

ADVERTISEMENT

All Critics (4) | Fresh (1) | Rotten (2) | DVD (2)

Even though it has a few chilling and comical moments, overall it drags and doesn't have much of a bite.

May 4, 2008 Full Review Source: Ozus' World Movie Reviews
Ozus' World Movie Reviews

A unworthy sequel to a good idea.

October 12, 2003
Journal and Courier (Lafayette, IN)

Audience Reviews for Scream, Blacula, Scream!

I was really disappointed with this Blacula sequel. What was up with all the stupid voodoo stuff? Voodoo has zombies, not vampires, I think. Anyway, it's way worse than the first one.
September 5, 2010
ajv2688

Super Reviewer

This, the follow up to "Blacula" is a little bit more campy (both in general, and in a stereotypical blaxploitation way), but not quite as fun or good. It's okay enough, but is noticeably less good, and that's a disappointment. The tie-in with voodoo is decent I suppose, but the film just leaves a lot to be desired. Also, it's maybe a couple of minutes longer than its predecessor, but the terrible pacing makes it feel at least 30 minutes longer.

Too bad it drags, because this could have been a real scream (hehe). William Marshall returns as Mamuwalde/Blacula, and onces again gives a good performances (far better than he needs to, really). With his hight and booming deep voice, he makes for a striking and imposing vampire. Pam Grier co-stars in this (much to my delight), and, while her performance is good, ishe's been better. Unfortunately, neither she nor Marshall can fully save this, but they do ensure that the film is still watchable.

The original was no masterpiece, but they at least tried to aspire to somehting beyond mere exploitation. This is just lazy. I do still kind of recommend it, but only for the absolutely curious.
June 14, 2010
cosmo313
Chris Weber

Super Reviewer

No quotes approved yet for Scream, Blacula, Scream!. Logged in users can submit quotes.

Discussion Forum

There are no discussion threads for Scream, Blacula, Scream! yet.

Foreign Titles

  • Scream Blacula Scream (DE)
  • Scream Blacula Scream (UK)
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile