RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
RT's Blu-ray HQ
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
Horrible.
by Victoria Alexander | September 27, 2005
Discuss Article
SERENITY
By
Victoria Alexander
FilmsInReview.com

My new column, THE DEVIL’S HAMMER, appears every Monday on fromthebalcony.com. The Sept. 26th column features: The Phenomenal Tao Nightclub at Venetian, Vegas Magazine Party at The Palms, George Clooney Infests Invests in Las Vegas, McCormick and Schmidt Seafood Restaurant Renovation, The Da Vinci Code, The Psychic Macaw, A Movie Star’s “Fraud” Marriage, Madonna’s Gay Husband?, and more

This is what happens when you have TV power. Joss Whedon’s TV series “Firefly” had fans (most of them were in the audience at the promotional screening I attended last night) but not enough for the series to continue after only eleven episodes. Nevertheless, Whedon has “juice” (“Buffy, the Vampire Slayer” and its spin-off, “Angel”) and Universal Pictures gave him money to patch together a movie of his maligned baby.

[A comment by my husband applies here: We signed up for a friend’s weeklong biofeedback program. We left after two days. My husband told the director: “How do you tell someone their baby is ugly?”]

SERENITY takes place 500 years in the future. Other solar system planets have been inhabited and the whole shebang is ambitiously controlled by the monolithic Alliance. Science now can program everyone’s thoughts and lives (For those interested, I’d like to recommend Jose M. R. Delgrado’s notorious “Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society.”). All, except rebel Capt. Malcolm "Mal" Reynolds (Nathan Fillion) and the crew of his ship, Serenity.

The ship’s doctor, Simon (Sean Maher), needs help freeing his creepy, catatonic, but powerfully psychic, 17-year-old sister River Tam (Summer Glau), from the Alliance’s grip. Shoeless and dopey, River is the latest model of war-craft: a 90-pound killing machine with extraordinary psychic powers. River is controlled with MK-ULTRA-like commands. It is a very easy rescue but Alliance forces, led by a mysterious gent known as Operative (Chiwetel Ejiofor), pursue Serenity across planetary systems. Operative will not die.

If you are not a “cult” fan, the story is simple enough to follow. Fillion, an obvious alterego for Whedon, is given all the sexy close-ups. I liked the personality of the crew, especially the guy who kept – realistically – complaining about the mission to rescue the monosyllabic River. Well, you will be pleased to know that when spooky River is programmed to kill, she finds a pair of SS regulation boots!

The physical laws of strength do not apply here. River is one of those spacey chicks that soon gets annoying. River, for all her importance to the Alliance, is a waif-burden. What I liked about SERENITY? Saying exactly what I liked is a spoiler.

SPOILER ALERT!

The deaths and the hip dialogue. Fillion does not believe in taking prisoners or letting diplomacy mar his agenda. His ex-girlfriend should be dropped off at the nearest planet. The special effects are horrible and Whedon, for all his proclaimed love for his baby, has not realized his universe with the cruel intelligence of, let’s say, BLADE RUNNER.

Victoria Alexander answers your emails and she’s emotionally prepared for the wrath of Firefly/Serenity fans. She can be reached by visiting FilmsInReview.com or, directly, at masauu@aol.com.
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-7 of 7 posts) | Reply
tsmeltzer
tsmeltzer writes:
on Mar 09 2007 06:07 AM

So says the woman who loved Norbit and The Animal. Get a real job.

(Reply to this)
curefreak
curefreak writes:
on Nov 29 2007 09:49 AM

Confusing review.

(Reply to this)
screamsinthenight
screamsinthenight writes:
on Jan 21 2008 01:50 PM

This is one of the worst reviews I've ever read in my life.

(Reply to this)
screamsinthenight
screamsinthenight writes:
on Jan 21 2008 01:56 PM

And you suck.

(Reply to this)
Tolstoyo
Tolstoyo writes:
on Feb 04 2008 10:12 PM

I actually started an account just to remark on how atrocious this review is. Misleading, imperceptive and snobbish. Ironically the title is an appropriate description but not of the film. This review is HORRIBLE.

On a side note this review (most might) fails to at least observe the brilliant fluency of the clever opening sequences. It is my favorite portion of the film from a technical standpoint (I'm going to share it with you because I'm a geek, but also, and more importantly, in light of such an unfair review I feel compelled to point out how daft Victoria's understanding of cinema is) It is a virtuoso sequence. The seductive editing is so remarkably seamless that it's easy to overlook its genius. Notice how from the opening shot into the punchline title, everything flows as one continuous narrative; A culmination of sequences harmonized by a singular line of thought that is unbroken by visual cuts. (The narration to the narrator, as part of a dream within an escape sequence which is a video playback watched by someone trying to find out "Where are you hiding. Little girl?" - Serenity) (i love it!) The next shot is also a technically brilliant and subtly executed long shot. Several minutes without a cut that effectively establishes all the characters.

The film is flat out entertaining. That will be all for today.


(Reply to this)
bittens
bittens writes:
on Feb 09 2008 04:54 AM

Okay. Here's the thing. Either 1)you have your facts wrong, or 2) you are purposely misrepresenting things to make the movie sound worse than it was.

1) If you can't remember what happened, at least do your bloody research. River? Has had those boots for ages. She's been on the ship *eight months.* You don't think it's reasonable she's picked up some boots in that time? You could have looked on any fansite and been told that she had those boots on the TV show.
Science cannot program people's thoughts. Is River a mindless slave to the Alliance? Nope. Is there anything to suggest that they can outright control people's thoughts? Nope. In fact, quite the opposite, since River is their best effort and she's definetly not under their control.
I'm not sure where you got the idea that they control people's lives, either. Sure, they like to be in control, but they're not mapping out the lives of every little person in the galaxy or anything.
Mal and the crew are not the only ones who are not so enamoured with the Alliance. Hello, you can't fight a war with nine people. Lots of people dislike them. They lost the war and are offically under Alliance rule, but they don't like it, and quite a few of them turn to a life of crime instead.
River is dopey? Uh-uh. She's crazy, but by no means is she like that little dude from Snow White. She's not bumbling, she's not stupid. She's just crazy, graceful, psychic, very intelligent, and could kick the Karate Kid's sorry ***.
Simon spent his entire fortune getting in to rescue River. And seeing as we didn't see exactly how he did get in there, I don't why you're saying it's easy. It could have taken him years for all we know.
River was not catatonic. She was schizophrenic and she had lost the ability to block her emotions, meaning she felt the full brunt of everything and couldn't do anything about it.

2) For Christ's sake, if the movie was really so awful, you wouldn't have to lie about it to make it sound worse than it was.

Now, onto opinions.
So, Joss Whedon, in all his arrogance, is writing a romanticized portrait of himself in the form of Malcolm Reynolds. Mal does indeed have lots of sexy close ups, just like the stars of every other movie since they came up with the tecnique of close-ups. Because movie stars are hot, duh. Why does a sixteen year old have to explain this concept to you?
Furthermore, Mal is an angry ******* for a good 40 minutes of the movie. It's pointed out several times, so we can safely assume that that was on purpose. Why would Joss write his obvious alterego as an angry *******?

So, now we are left with River being annoying and the special effects being awful. There have been so many facts wrong about River that I don't think we can consider your opinion an informed or accurate one, and as the special effects... They were low budget, so the effects are nothing special. But they also had a great team who was very dedicated, and I didn't see anything bad in the effects either. They were just average.

By this stage, the only point in your review that I have not completely ripped apart is an unsupported statement about the effects, which would be impossible to disprove anyway, because of the aforementioned part about it being unsupported.

Also, I've never seen The Animal, but you apparently liked Norbit. I think I understand why you gave such an incredibly inaccurate review of Serenity. And I gotta tell you, watching films while smashed and then reviewing them just can't be good for your career.


(Reply to this)
RHF
RHF writes:
on Jun 24 2009 01:54 PM

Wow, and here I was having trouble figuring out a single word to use to describe you as a reviewer and a person.

Thanks!


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Serenity
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • Edinburgh 2008: What to Watch (6)
  • RT on DVD: The Lives of Others, RoboCop 20th Anniversary, and More Out Today (2)
  • Whedon Walks On "Wonder Woman" (21)
  • Whedon Confirms It: No "Serenity" Sequels (21)
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Ashton vs. Ashton - This Time It's Personal (1)
  • "Serenity" Doco Made Available for (Free!) Download (14)
  • "Superman Returns" -- More Than a Quarter Billion Spent (36)
  • "White Noise 2" Set Visit: Hanging With Nathan Fillion, PLUS The First "White Noise 2" Set Photos! (15)
  • Ejiofor Talks "Children" -- and "Serenity" Sequel (kinda) (10)
  • Nathan Fillion Talks "White Noise" Sequel (8)

Most Discussed

  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Avatar Live Up To The Hype? (224)
  • Total Recall: Keith David's Best Movies (81)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Girlpower Rules Again with Princess at #1 (50)
  • The Gimmicks That Changed Cinema: Part 1 (36)
  • Help Us Choose the Community Golden Tomato Award (32)
  • The Effects of Where the Wild Things Are (29)
  • Weekly Ketchup: James Cameron Plans a Fantastic Voyage (28)
  • Robert Downey Jr. talks Sherlock Holmes & Iron Man 2 - RT Interview (21)
  • Critics Consensus: Princess, Invictus Are Certified Fresh (21)
  • Awards Tour: D.C. Film Critics Name Up in the Air as Year's Best (18)

Latest News

  • Awards Tour 2009: Avatar Best Picture at NYFCO! (3)
  • Awards Tour 2009: The Hurt Locker Wins New York Film Critics Circle! (4)
  • Awards Tour 2009: Inglourious Basterds Lead Critics Choice Noms (16)
  • Awards Tour 2009: LAFCA: The Hurt Locker Tops List (12)
  • Awards Tour 2009: The Hurt Locker Dominates Boston Society of Film Critics (17)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Girlpower Rules Again with Princess at #1 (48)
  • Weekly Ketchup: James Cameron Plans a Fantastic Voyage (28)
  • Friday Harvest: Iron Man 2, Tron Legacy, and more! (18)
  • Five Favorite Films with Keith David (13)
  • The Effects of Where the Wild Things Are (29)

Latest Interviews

  • Robert Downey Jr. talks Sherlock Holmes & Iron Man 2 - RT Interview (21)
  • Director Ruben Fleischer Talks Zombieland (2)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (17)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (12)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (23)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (8)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (15)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (23)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (9)
  • Wolverine Creator Len Wein Talks About the Film (28)

Latest Features

  • The Effects of Where the Wild Things Are (29)
  • The Gimmicks That Changed Cinema: Part 2 (7)
  • The Gimmicks That Changed Cinema: Part 1 (36)
  • Five Favorite Films With Avatar's Sam Worthington (53)
  • Exclusive: The World of Where the Wild Things Are (10)
  • Sundance 2010: RT's 10 Most Anticipated Movies (42)
  • 10 Horrifically Profitable Films (46)
  • Ban Them All! 10 Infamously Controversial Movies (106)
  • 5 Facts About The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (107)
  • Five Favorite Films With Zombieland Director Ruben Fleischer (25)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Games| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.