animation is hardly groundbreaking
animation is not everything
Jun 11 - 12:22 PM
So tell me did you actually watch the movie?
Aug 31 - 09:15 PM
dude animation is awsome
Sep 23 - 07:29 PM
Maybe by 2011 standard the animation is not all that amazing, but what you have to do while watching it is remember that the movie came out in 2001! It has been 10 years since it was released and a lot has changed in the field of animation since then! Also it had to have taken at least 4 years from before the release date to finish, so essentially it is superb for a project that started in the late 90's!
Nov 10 - 08:28 PM
I was about to type the same thing. This review was written last year, and the movie came out over a decade ago. Obviously the animation isn't going to be comparable with today's.
And why should the animation have to be groundbreaking to be a good movie? Even if it was just decent, the plot and acting are enough to make this movie fresh.
Apr 7 - 01:44 PM
review is hardly relevant
Nov 26 - 11:22 PM
check your eyes pal cuz i don't think they work anymore
Feb 29 - 04:36 PM
You're comment is hardly worth...well, anything.
Mar 16 - 09:35 PM
The animation is this film WAS groundbreaking in 2001. I recall being mezmerized by the advancement in the calibre of animent over what came before it.
May 3 - 11:17 AM
The animation is this film WAS groundbreaking in 2001. I recall being mesmerized by the advancement in the calibre of animent over what came before it.
May 3 - 11:19 AM
The animation is this film WAS groundbreaking in 2001. I recall being mesmerized by the advancement in the calibre of rendering over what came before it.
did you really just give an explanation in four words?...For 2001, this was pretty damn good. Try not to wait 10 years to watch it next time please?
May 14 - 07:29 PM
Sino Pa Ako
A review from Feb 13, 2011 about a 2001 film.
Logic Level: Fuck this shit.
Well Mr. Nesbit, you're too old (and slow) for this critic thing.
This reminds me of that review from 200 about the film Gremlins.
Aug 4 - 10:46 AM