Shrek

Shrek

88%

Critic Review - Old School Reviews

animation is hardly groundbreaking

February 13, 2011 Full Review Source: Old School Reviews | Comments (11)
Old School Reviews

Comments

Jarrod H.

Jarrod Hunter

animation is not everything

Jun 11 - 12:22 PM

Brett Israel

Brett Israel

So tell me did you actually watch the movie?

Aug 31 - 09:15 PM

William Caudill

William Caudill

dude animation is awsome

Sep 23 - 07:29 PM

Jewel Millard

Jewel Millard

Maybe by 2011 standard the animation is not all that amazing, but what you have to do while watching it is remember that the movie came out in 2001! It has been 10 years since it was released and a lot has changed in the field of animation since then! Also it had to have taken at least 4 years from before the release date to finish, so essentially it is superb for a project that started in the late 90's!

Nov 10 - 08:28 PM

Kyle A.

Kyle Adam

I was about to type the same thing. This review was written last year, and the movie came out over a decade ago. Obviously the animation isn't going to be comparable with today's.

And why should the animation have to be groundbreaking to be a good movie? Even if it was just decent, the plot and acting are enough to make this movie fresh.

Stupid critic.

Apr 7 - 01:44 PM

Brian F.

Brian Fredericksen

review is hardly relevant

Nov 26 - 11:22 PM

Nick Dugan

Nick Dugan

check your eyes pal cuz i don't think they work anymore

Feb 29 - 04:36 PM

Tyler Werbenjagermanjensen

Tyler Werbenjagermanjensen

You're comment is hardly worth...well, anything.

Mar 16 - 09:35 PM

Kadrick Ninness

Kadrick Ninness

The animation is this film WAS groundbreaking in 2001. I recall being mezmerized by the advancement in the calibre of animent over what came before it.

May 3 - 11:17 AM

Kadrick Ninness

Kadrick Ninness

The animation is this film WAS groundbreaking in 2001. I recall being mesmerized by the advancement in the calibre of animent over what came before it.

May 3 - 11:19 AM

Kadrick Ninness

Kadrick Ninness

The animation is this film WAS groundbreaking in 2001. I recall being mesmerized by the advancement in the calibre of rendering over what came before it.

May 3 - 11:19 AM

Philip Gibbs

Philip Gibbs

did you really just give an explanation in four words?...For 2001, this was pretty damn good. Try not to wait 10 years to watch it next time please?

May 14 - 07:29 PM

Sino Pa Ako

Sino Pa Ako

A review from Feb 13, 2011 about a 2001 film.

Logic Level: Fuck this shit.

Well Mr. Nesbit, you're too old (and slow) for this critic thing.

This reminds me of that review from 200 about the film Gremlins.

Aug 4 - 10:46 AM

Find us on:                     
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile