Five Favorite Films with Elizabeth Olsen

The rising star of this week's Silent House also talks about the rigors of the shoot, and the pressure of following up her acclaimed Martha Marcy May Marlene.



Silent House is another intense performance from you after Martha Marcy May Marlene. Do you feel any pressure with this, given the accolades you received for Martha?

Elizabeth Olsen: I think I did at first but, you know, they're different audiences, the two movies. I'm a horror movie fan, and I want horror movie fans to go and see this movie -- and that's a very different audience than people going to art cinema. So at first I was like, "Oh I'm so nervous, what are the critics gonna say?" but now it's just like, "Wait, this is an audience's movie." That's how I'm thinking about it.

You also set the bar too high for yourself. You should've started with a really crappy film.

[Laughs] I know. [Laughs]

Was this actually shot in one take?

No. No, it wasn't. It was very difficult. We did about 13 takes, so the average take was about 10, 12 minutes; maybe a couple were seven minutes. So that's how we did it.

Did you get far into takes and then make a mistake and have to do them again?

Every day. Every single day we did one shot, and so we literally just worked on one chunk for 12 hours. They only had one or two options that they were allowed to use in editing, because everything else would have a mistake in it and it'd be technically for nothing.

I was watching closely the blood splattered on your neck, for example, to see if it moved or changed shape across shots.

To try and find the continuity? [Laughs] Yeah. There were so many pictures taken at all times. Once we'd finished -- actually completed a take fully, all 12 minutes, and they felt confidently about it -- every single department was snapping away, all over the set, all over my body. It was just, we literally would have to pick up continuity and be, "Oh, you had a tear here -- we have to put a little shiny thing here." [Laughs]

So you were being watched very intensely by all these people?

Yeah. But it was really fun to do these long takes and have the crew be a boom guy and a camera guy -- and that's it. And you're just in a house, playing make believe. There was something really cool about that. I mean, it was exhausting and difficult, but there was something cool to it.

Did filming these multiple long takes help heighten the intensity of the performance?

It did build the intensity. I don't know if it helped or not, because I tried hard to try and have some kind of journey and variation; but sometimes -- because of the repetitive nature of how we filmed it; there's no other way to do it, I don't think -- it definitely made things more intense. And you know, if it works it works. I sometimes wish I could go back and be like, "If only I were more brave in that part," 'cause I feel like that was needed, or something like that -- but you're always gonna do that for every movie, so I'm just letting it go.



This character's pretty traumatized. How do you get to a point where you're able to escalate that trauma? What sort of preparation did you do?

You know, we did discuss a lot -- and obviously I don't want to give away the ending -- but we did discuss a lot about what happens with trauma and people who hide it, and things like that. So that's just something that I needed to learn a little bit more about, to justify what happens in the end and understand it. When it comes to just being chased around the house and being scared for your life and trying to get out, I have a pretty fatalistic imagination -- and eventually, as we were filming it, it just became like this muscle. And I was actually very sensitive in my everyday life. For instance: I wasn't driving, but let's say if I was driving and someone flipped me off or something, I probably would have cried. [Laughs] I was so sensitive. I feel like it was such a muscle that came on, like being scared or hurt or nervous -- because of doing it over and over again.

Those are real tears in the film, then.

Yeah. [Laughs]

These characters you're playing -- Sara in this, Martha, and even some of the parts you've got coming up -- are so harrowed and in such emotional peril. What is it with you and these kinds of roles?

I'm really interested in working on movies that are also kind of like different genres. I feel like Martha's one genre, this is a different type of genre; both are difficult in their own ways, and challenging. But I did do this movie Liberal Arts with Josh Radnor that was at Sundance; I really wanted to do something happy [Laughs]. And I did.

Okay. I was getting worried about you there.

[Laughs] And I'm doing a really fun movie with Dakota Fanning that's more based in, what do you call it? It's not like a comedy but it's also not a drama. It's just kind of real. We're doing that, and then I'm doing two different period pieces -- so I am trying to mix it up.

Are you looking forward to playing [writer and Jack Kerouac's wife] Edie Parker in Kill Your Darlings?

Yeah, I'm so excited. We do that in New York at the end of March. I feel like I'm doing her autobiography in my mind, but I'm really doing four scenes of her life. [Laughs] But I'm very excited. It's gonna be a great movie.


Silent House is in theaters this week.

Comments

Dave J

Dave J

The only Olsen and perhaps the most grounded out of all the sisters so far!

Mar 6 - 12:40 PM

Jonathan Cribbs

Jonathan Cribbs

They're all pretty grounded. You never heard anything crazy about any of them.

Apr 7 - 01:41 PM

Frisby2007

Frisby 2007

I have never watched any previews, or even read about it, but I want to watch Gone with the Wind so bad.

Mar 6 - 01:01 PM

Adam Stevenson

Adam Stevenson

You've never seen "Gone With The Wind"? Wow. Yeah, get thee to a DVD store, pronto. Sure, it's a little odd in this day and age to root for people fighting to be slave owners and who have slaves and treat them cruelly, slap them, and call them "darkies", and the idea of a film wanting you to think those people are the "heroes" - and the fact that the main character is a spoiled, rich, whining brat who, even in the middle of her worst times when you'd think she'd gain some humility, slaps her slave and treats people horribly, and the entire thing ends with nobody's characters changing or evolving in even the most minimal way, but - hey, it looks pretty!

Mar 7 - 02:16 AM

Bernardo Leyte Cortés

Bernardo Leyte Cortés

dude gone with the wind came out decades ago, I don't know what the fuck you're on about about watching the previews!!!

Mar 7 - 04:38 AM

Frisby2007

Frisby 2007

Looks like someone forgot to put their tampon on, calm down. I saw some of the previews on tv & I think on the special features of The Wizard of Oz Blu-Ray.

Mar 8 - 01:36 PM

Penny L.

Penny Lane

She sounds like she has the same kind of taste in movies as I do:)

Mar 6 - 01:04 PM

Jasmine Pugh

Jasmine Pugh

Same here :)

May 25 - 04:09 AM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I guess I'm the only one who fell asleep reading this.

Mar 6 - 01:18 PM

Brad H.

Brad Hadfield

Should she have thrown in a Transformer movie to wake you up?

Annie Hall & Manhattan are amazing.

Mar 6 - 02:24 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

I didn't see any Transformers on Emily Blunt's list. This is just a boring list, and those are obvious Woody Allen choices. "Manhatten" is great, but her homesick reason is not insightful. I have less patience for "Annie Hall". I love Woody's films where he's making fun of his adorable ineptness ("Stardust Memories", "Broadway Danny Rose", "Love and Death") rather than just being selfish and arrogant. Sorry Liz, I loved "Martha Marcy May Marlene", though.

Mar 6 - 02:33 PM

Michael Kiossev

Michael Kiossev

Oh okay. So your suggesting you and Elizabeth have differing opinions? A staggering revelation, thanks for the insight.

Mar 6 - 10:00 PM

Wil H.

Wil Huff

It's her personal favorites, who care if they're typical. Posters on this site never fail to amaze me with how snobbish they act when it comes to these lists (then turn around and list the most predicable choices among their personal favorites). Criticizing her reasoning is even more obnoxious. If she genuinely loves Manhattan for reminding her of home then who are you to say it isn't a good reason? She isn't writing a professional review, she's giving her personal favorites during an informal interview. Not everyone is great at articulating their personal tastes, especially 22-year-olds.

Mar 6 - 11:16 PM

Adam Stevenson

Adam Stevenson

Dude, it's her OWN PERSONAL FAVORITES. She's not giving some OBJECTIVE list of "great films". Christ.

Mar 7 - 02:18 AM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

More swishy bitching. You people act so appalled! Your Christ does not compel me.

Mar 7 - 11:42 AM

IrreducibleKoan

Sean Pak

To be fair Janson, we can continue your line of thinking ad infinitum. You were whiny when you called Olsen's list boring, but then you're complaining that the people complaining about your comment are whiny. But one can easily say they are as entitled to whine about your comment as you're entitled to whine about the article. I usually like your comments, Janson, but I think it's pointless, and a little hypocritical, to call what the OTHERS are doing "bitching."

Mar 7 - 09:54 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

@Koan - I think the essential difference is not whether or not there is a difference of opinion regarding Olsen's choices, but whether someone should be able to question those choices. The last three respondents don't seem to have a problem with 'why' I took exception, rather than seem to be offended that I disagreed at all. I don't mean to demean Olsen personally, and I've supported her performance in "MMMM" many times. I don't mean anything personal about my criticism, and it's not like I'm telling Full House or skinny jokes. If I think her fave five is boring, I may be wrong, and I'm not incapable of being proven wrong. But I don't like being shamed into thinking I shouldn't be able to express my opinion. So I'm never implying that Olsen doesn't have the right to chose the five films she wants, but the basic gist of these respondents is that I don't have the right to disagree or have a different take on them. So their 'whining' has a more restricting intention. When I call out someone over their opinion, it's usually to open them up, to get them to expand on their view beyond whether or not they like or hate something. I think there is a difference, but honestly Miss Olsen's taste doesn't seem to me to be worth fighting over.

Mar 8 - 12:04 AM

IrreducibleKoan

Sean Pak

Fair enough. I'm not going to get into a tizzy fit over it either.

I'm actually the opposite of you about the Allen movies she listed. I loathe Manhattan. It's so overrated. But I love the city of NY, so if she wants to use that reasoning for choosing it, I respect that. I'm always in the mood for Annie Hall though. Plus, not many women, much less hot women in their early 20s, would have that as a favorite. Then giving a shout out to an underrated musical, Pal Joey, that not many people in their early 20s, much less a hot woman, would know about and think of as the overlooked gem it is. So, anything but boring to me, but different strokes man.

Mar 8 - 12:53 AM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Exactly! And although I'm not about to agree with you on any of that, I respect it as sincere opinion. So if I were to say that Woody Allen is selfish and arrogant in "Annie Hall", as opposed to other films, then that's an invitation to explain to me why I'm wrong. We should use the opportunity to discuss the differences rather than conform them.

Mar 8 - 01:46 AM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

In light of RT removing my comment - I want to point out that I have never flagged spam on anyone else's comment. Hence, my point - Whiney Ass Bitches! The best you can do is flag my comment until it's deleted? Punks. Try something a little more semantic next time.

Mar 8 - 08:28 PM

Double.Dubs

Edward Stymest

You sound the type who wants to impress a girl (the high-status Olsen sister) by sheer, aggressive assertiveness of your proclaimed intelligence.

Mar 8 - 08:28 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

And more bitches! Is commenting on my alternative Woody Allen faves somehow in the ballpark of you soursuck shitkicks? Fuck my foot you fraggle bastard!

Mar 8 - 08:33 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

It would be a shame if you were the same Edward Stymest busted for running whores in Halifax, only to run here talking about who I'm trying to impress.

Mar 8 - 08:37 PM

Rick Baurer

Rick Baurer

Martha Macy Mary Marlene was an over-hyped movie and not something that I have any desire to watch again. It did not showcase Olsen in a manner that proved if she can act or not, so I say the jury is still out. A horror flick doesn't seem like a way to showcase one's talent or lack of either. She does seem to be her own person and seems grounded, much unlike her older sisters.

Also, I don't care for Dakota Fanning.

Mar 6 - 02:04 PM

Brad H.

Brad Hadfield

Yeah, horror "flicks" didn't highlight the talents of Jack Nicholson, Mia Farrow, Donald Sutherland, Linda Blair or Gregory Peck.

Mar 6 - 02:29 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Glad to see you do like 'some' girls.

Mar 6 - 02:34 PM

Brad H.

Brad Hadfield

In support of Dakota... come on. Heart-breaking in Man On Fire for one. And did you see The Runaways? Granted, despite your youth and access to Google anything, you don't have a clue. You're the kind of tool who didn't know who Sir Paul McCartney was at the Grammy Awards. Do you like tweeting your ignorance to all?

Mar 6 - 02:35 PM

Carl Wilson

Carl Wilson

What happened to the rest of the Olsens from Little House on the Prairie?

Mar 6 - 02:15 PM

Jon J.

Jon Johannesson

Both Annie Hall and Manhattan are amazing, great choices!

Mar 6 - 02:40 PM

Santiago Varese

Santiago Varese

Nowhere does it say it's a remake of a uruguayan film. The article rottentomatoes published said the original was an argentinian film, which is false. Not that it's a good film, mind you (it isn't), but credit should be given to the original's filmakers.

Mar 6 - 03:33 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Thanks for clearing that up. The Salon article made the same mistake. I think the confusion is because the film had it's first opening in Argentina. I don't believe you for a second, though, on whether it's any good or not. I've heard enough to the contrary to give me enough desire to see it for myself.

Mar 6 - 03:42 PM

Santiago Varese

Santiago Varese

I meant the original not the remake. Still, the public reaction was pretty divisive, so you should probably still see it. I really liked the film until the final half hour or so.

Mar 6 - 09:07 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

Good, because the original is the one I want to see. Man, one of these Cinemax 'micro-channels' just showed the original tonight, but I missed it, and it doesn't appear to be listed anytime in the next couple weeks. Blink and you miss it moment.

Mar 7 - 12:16 AM

Swampfox

Pat Marion

I completely agree. The ending was a huge let down. I did not enjoy the original so I'll probably not watch the remake.

Mar 7 - 07:45 AM

Brent Cooley

Brent Cooley

I did not care for the original. The filmmakers tried, but personally, I did not find suspenseful nor was there any real sense of dread.

Mar 7 - 09:28 PM

Dave J

Dave J

A 5.4 score from imdb, but did well for the critics for 73% despite a low 34% rating from the viewing audience is nothing to brag about, but still you're correct it's still a remake except this version might be better!

Mar 7 - 12:43 PM

Sean D.

Sean D

Gorgeous, talented, and a good taste in movies! Complete package, love it!

Mar 6 - 04:06 PM

Joel M.

Joel Moore

Why is his youth a problem? People cannot have perspective or taste when young? I am young, and I can express myself better than you can. Who cares about Paul McCartney being at an event? Liking a band's music does not mean you have to care about the musicians involved or what they do with their lives. What about using a silly title makes you think you are superior to anyone else here (the sir thing), no one with any self-awareness talks that prissily.

Mar 6 - 04:52 PM

Janson Jinnistan

Janson Jinnistan

This sounds like the prissy proof. Although off topic, you should probably realize that McCartney is superior than most other songwriters and musicians, holding several records with The Beatles and by himself ("Yesterday" is the most covered song of all-time and he holds a Guiness World Record for songs on the charts, etc). There's no excuse to not be curious. "Liking a band's music doesn't mean you have to care about the musicians involved". Well, you don't HAVE to do anything, free country that it is, but you also don't HAVE to be stubbornly ignorant about the people who created the object of your enjoyment. There's no law that says you HAVE to be grateful for their hard work by respecting their contributions. Some things can't be taught, you just have to learn them on your own. But the thing that was so idiotic about the McCartney thing was that several dozen kids went on Twitter to say they didn't know who he was, presumably using the same devices that they could have used to find out who he was via Google, Allmusic, or Wikipedia. I think that says something about priorities. But, I agree, most kids aren't stupid, but you're doing them no favors.

Mar 6 - 05:33 PM

James Joyce

James Joyce

What is this Gone With the Wind??
And why did they capitalize the W in with??
And really... at its core... what is happiness??

Mar 6 - 07:15 PM

IrreducibleKoan

Sean Pak

Why not capitalize "With"? It isn't an article like "the" or "a."

Mar 7 - 04:00 PM

staindslaved

Matthew Younker

I'm I the only one whose never even heard of Pal Joey?

Mar 6 - 08:18 PM

Adam Stevenson

Adam Stevenson

You're probably not the ONLY one, but most people who know movies know "Pal Joey" - it's based on a VERY famous musical, and the film has been a known classic since it was made. It just probably means you haven't seen a lot of old musicals, no big deal.

Mar 7 - 02:20 AM

Julian N.

Julian Nunez

Elizabeth is gorgeous and really talented. Watched Martha Marcy May Marlene a while ago, and she was excellent.

Mar 6 - 09:50 PM

What's Hot On RT

Total Recall
Total Recall

Bradley Cooper's Best Movies

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Fast & Furious 6 is Certified Fresh

24 Frames
24 Frames

Fast & Furious cars gallery

Summer Movie Scorecard
Summer Movie Scorecard

Blockbusters ranked!

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile