Please log in to participate in this forum.
This isn't James Bond. It's just a fairly good action thriller. What is James Bond? Bond is the guy with suave, unbeatable demeanor, you know bond is going to survive and then have his Shaken Martini! This guy drinks Beer!? It's a shame the 007 franchise has became so serious. We're used to seeing Bond in impossible situations and then the punch lines, the famous punch lines.....Hahn...the days of James Bond is gone and 007 Craig are here. As I said its good, but its not a James Bond Film. I can't figure why they changed the format so drastically, the old films always had huge audiences and made plenty of money. I would rather have the action back, who's going to remember complicated acting dialogue over ACTION and Shaken, NOT Stirred. To bad well probably never see a real James Bond film again, as long as the critics put complicated dialogue over action sequences, I mean I thought I was watching a Shakespearian play, not a action packed 007 movie. Writers and publishers, producers and Directors, get your balls back and make these films the way they were intended! Screw bad reviews from people who would rather be watching CATS anyway!
Feb 14 - 08:45 PM
He drinks beer because it's an issue with Heineken and consumerism, not the character of Bond. Heineken bought the rights advertise its beer in the Bond films. I don't like it either, but get used to it.
And again, I'll say that Craig's interpretation of Bond is accurate to Ian Fleming's vision of the character which is evident in the 007 novels.
Feb 23 - 01:20 PM
This comment has been removed.
We've laid out our beefs over the ending in an essay called "Five Reasons SKYFALL Fell Flat"... http://www.dearcastandcrew.com/letters/2012/11/16/five-reasons-skyfall-fell-flat.html
Nov 19 - 01:33 PM
I've seen a few Bond films in my 60 years but this one is THE WORST I've ever seen. The theme tune and the view of the casino as Bond arrives are the ONLY good things worth mentioning. Even the acting of most of the key roles wasn't the best I've seen them do but I don't suppose the lame script helped in that regard. The whole premise/plot was pathetic and bland to say the least, with some absolutely terrible parts thrown in to put it beyond doubt. Why the hell ANYONE found this to be a good film is beyond me and I can only assume, that those who have made positive posts here (which mislead me to waste my time and money watching it), haven't seen the previous GOOD Bond films to compare it to.
If you've seen the GOOD Bond films and you're expecting some of the same in this one PLEASE BE ADVISED that it is NOTHING LIKE any previous Bond film I've seen and I strongly advise you NOT to waste your time and money going to watch it.
Nov 18 - 05:41 AM
Most people who found Skyfall to be a good movie never managed to articulate why it was a good movie. I think the glaring plot holes and non-sense don't bother these people as they do to us.
Nov 21 - 03:03 PM
I'm sure some of the hundreds of critics do a decent job of that. Everything about it was good, and the plot holes you claim aren't distracting unless you look for them.
Nov 24 - 10:27 PM
The critics are all ideologues who will give a crap movie a high mark if it pushes the right political message, and a good film a crap mark if it dissents from the bien pensant orthodoxy.
Dec 17 - 06:43 AM
*Sigh*
@Tj
You are everything wrong with moviegoers. You claim to be the shining beacon of light among a generation of Michael Bay enthusiasts when you're actually worse - at least they are generally too stupid to voice an opinion and actually just enjoy themselves.
You're the quintessential movie-snob. Every film has to have a profound purpose, a genre-defining message, anything to populate your mind with opinion and philosophy as you clearly totally devoid of it yourself. You can only enjoy one kind of film, to the point I was able to predict three of your list of the "besterest films I ever saw" before I even read it (though did get a chuckle at the honorable mention of Moneyball - which while entertaining, doesn't scratch the top 25 of anyone who knows what they're talking about). Movies can be champions of various aspects of film-making, and while Skyfall is not at that level, it is easily in the top 5 or 6 Bond films.
Every film doesn't have to be a Shawshank (also my fave film) to be enjoyable or even good. So please drop the condescension - you are not nearly as intelligent as you believe yourself to be and your opinion on film is entirely pedestrian.
Nov 18 - 03:33 AM
You shouldnt generalize. I saw Battleship and enjoyed it because its a no-brains action movie. I enjoyed Shawshank redemption because of its character and plot driven story. I hated Skyfall because it saw light on mindless action but the plot that should have taken its place was poorly constructed, making little sense. Not all of us expect to go back to classic bond with gadgets and cars. But a bad movie is a bad movie. I pose this question, if the main character wasn't James Bond, would you have thought it was a good film?
Feb 23 - 12:18 PM
So much bad and so little good. Why did they have to blow up the Aston Martin? And I kept thinking that maybe this is what our current scandal involving the CIA director is all about and that is why they are withholding all of the facts.
Nov 14 - 07:09 AM
Yeah this movie was pretty lame. No hot bond girls, way too long and boring, Silva the best bond villain ever? Yeah right... cyber terrorist, how lame can you get? I actually fell asleep during the movie and kept checking my watch to see how much longer I had to sit there. And that retarded ending with his stupid gatekeeper. Now if that secret tunnel in his house had gone to Hogwarts and harry potter and gang had showed up, the movie might have been saved. But no. How disappointing to find out the meaning of the title... it was like meh, who cares?
Nov 13 - 06:46 PM
I agree with your review this is the worst bond movie ever ( I have seen them all)
Nov 12 - 02:22 AM
Your review reads like a review of any of the Brosnan Bond movies besides Goldeneye. You know what to expect when you see a move with a main character named "James Bond", but for some reason you chose to watch this and zzzzzzZZZZZZZzzZzZZZZ have some sort of opinion.
Bardem was the only compelling Bond villain since I first saw Bond movies in theaters (I'm 30). The opening sequence was exciting without being gratuitous. [SPOILERS] While my girl and I both figured the new M and Moneypenny things out early, that was fun instead of tedious [End SPOILER]. My biggest criticism is that the movie lacked the camp nature of older Bond films, but after 22 James Bond movies (and three Austin Powers) it's hard to inject camp without coming off as parody. And as "Skyfall" and "Casino Royale" proved, Bond without camp is still damn entertaining.
I loved Goldeneye, and walked out of one of the next three Bond movies (seriously, I don't remember and am not sure if I saw all three of them). Mr. Swafford, if you liked "The World Is Not Enough", "Tomorrow Never Dies", or "Die Another Day" more than "Skyfall", you wasted readers' time by writing this. If you liked "Skyfall" more than those movies and still bothered writing this, you wasted you own time.
Overall, I found your review banal, ZZZZZzzzzzZzzZZZzzz, over-opinionated, zzzzzzzzZZZZZzzzzz, and tedious.
Nov 12 - 02:03 AM
At least I moved you into this VERY lengthy "You wasted my time" reply. More of an emotional impact than that of the "SkyFail" debacle. So I'll consider this a win for my review.
Nov 12 - 09:39 AM
Very true. This guys shown you up totally. I didn't think it was the best Bond ever, in fact I enjoyed Casino Royale more personally, but it was still a pretty damn good film in it's own right.
But yeah, even forced you into a corner enough to force the "yeah but you replied so I win" comment that is the intellectual equivalent of falling on ones sword.
Nov 18 - 03:14 AM
I liked 'Tomorrow Never Dies' better than 'Skyfall'. Sure, the villain in SF is more sinister, and the Rupert Murdoch guy was a joke (I actually follow Rupey on twitter, I like him), but the scope of 'Tomorrow Never Dies' was so much grander and more interesting. The Opening Scene is one of my favourites, where he steals the plane and ejects the co-pilot into the co-pilot seat of the other plane dog-fighting him.. hehe so cool.
And Michelle Yeoh was SUCH an awesome Bond Girl. She kicked ASS (Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon is my all time favourite film).
The international aspect of TND was really cool, Bond trying to avert a Global War with a Super Power nation, There was involvement with the Navy, I just though TND was quite good, and certainly much better than this garbage 'Skyfall'.
On my all time Bond movie rankings list, Tomorrow Never Dies is ranked 12th highest, whilst Skyfall is ranked 16th.
Dec 17 - 06:53 AM
Go back to watching the next Micheal Bay blockbuster with zero substance. That will be sure to have enough splosions for your ADD riddled ass.
Nov 12 - 01:13 AM
LOL, you took the words right out of my mouth except, you made it funnier. +1
Nov 12 - 05:30 AM
See that's the problem with this generation of sh*theads...you're collectively the WORST GENERATION EVER...and by proxy - you make everything else you touch and comment on... worse.
Nov 12 - 09:35 AM
Ouch!! Dude you have issues, ADD and probably insomnia... The movie was great, the story had depth and the action was bridged nicely with intense dialogue. If you would have kept your eyes open, you probably would have "seen" a different movie...
Nov 11 - 10:59 PM
If you think this movie had depth...then Kim Kardashian must be your soulmate of poetic, heartfelt romance?
Nov 12 - 09:47 AM
Just mentioning Kardashian in your reply shows that you lack the imaginative judgement to see what the movie really is. I went in the theater expecting Bond, not a sh*t load of gadgets and clichéd 1 liners every 5 mins. And yes the movie had depth!!! You knew where Bond came from and why he is who he is!!! Same with "M", well on the job side of her life. You clearly have a narrow minded view on what you are actually watching...
Nov 12 - 03:17 PM
Really...some dirty, empty old castle out in the middle of EFF ME, UK 90210 gave you "depth and understanding" of Jimmy B's humble beginnings? That's rich AND moreover the problems with movies these days...it's because more and more they are filled with easily-entertained monosylabs like yourself who can appreciate a nice "shiny" object. Tell me ohhh great champion of the celluloid, what are your top 5 movies.(Just so I can get some reference from your VAST knowledge of movie making).
Nov 12 - 04:31 PM
Wow. If you think a short monologue concerning JB's parents, an action scene involving the destruction of JB's parents mansion, and a quick image of JB's parents gravestone is "character depth" then you probably shouldn't be on a movie-based website pretending to be a critic. Do yourself a favor and read a drama book. You sound like an ignorant retard dude.
Nov 12 - 05:31 PM
Totally agree Andrew. This guy is who the movies are now catering too: The Easily Entertained.
Nov 12 - 07:19 PM
Wow!! Two idiots trying to prove to themselves that they know something about movies...
I don't need to prove anything to anyone, I am not easily entertain mind you... For instance, I did not like TDKR at all, and some other "supposedly" epic movies.
You two have been going around the forum and bashing everyone who didn't have the same opinion as you, REAL MATURE!! You may dislike the movie, doesn't make it a bad movie.
I loved the old Bond movies as much as any other person, but being redundant has its consequences. Just because there's less gadgets and Bond girls scenes still makes it a good Bond film for the direction the movie was going for. I enjoyed it for what it was and not for being repetitive like the ones they made from the 80s and 90s.
Nov 12 - 08:45 PM
@TJ
Top 5 movies:
1. Star Wars - A New Hope/Empire Strikes Back/Return of the Jedi
2. Indiana Jones and the last crusade
3. Lord of the Rings - The Return of the King
4. The Matrix
5. The Bourne Identity/Supremacy/Ultimatum
Honorable mentions :
The Score, Shooter, 300, Dredd, John Carter, Blade and many more...
Still, my taste in movies differ from the next person, but they're my choices. Agree with me or not...
Nov 12 - 09:00 PM
@Jonathan
My Top 5
1. Shawshank Redemption
2. The Killing Fields
3. Apocalypse Now
4. Blade Runner
5. Shindler's List.
Honorable mentions: Wit with (Emma Thompson), Phenomenon, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Jaws, MoneyBall, Brokeback Mountain...to name a few on my list... So we at least have to agree that we're expecting something differently when we pick up our respective tickets...and that's ok. Still won't change the fact this Bond movie has TOO many glaring story, production, casting and editing problems to make it a decent "Bond film in my eyes...(when they were actually open enough to SEE them)
Nov 12 - 09:36 PM
@Tj Exactly!! I knew before I went it that Skyfall wouldn't be like Brosnan's or Connery's Bond films, they had their own style, which is ok. I went in hoping to see something similar to Casino Royale, which parts of it was, but they changed it so it would not be repetitive, which is ok as well.
Nov 12 - 10:16 PM
Well put Adam. I think I get it now: Skyfall really managed to trick the average, not so difficult to please, viewers into thinking the story was great and "deep". But it falls flat for people like us who are more discerning.
Nov 21 - 03:07 PM
Dude, Skyfall had zero parts like casino royale. If casting the same people is the "parts" your talking about then just stop. Casino Royale maintained a relevant plot throughout the entire movie. In Skyfall they are going after a NOC list for the first half of them movie and then they just throw that all away and make it about revenge. They didn't even recover the NOC list!!! The bad guy cant even maintain the same character throughout the film. He goes from a calm, intelligent, murdering mastermind to wanting pity revenge (which already contradicts intelligence) to a totally deranged person with 'mommy-issues' thats wants to commit suicide!??? This movie has so many crappy plot holes it almost could be a comedy. Do you remember the scene where bond is standing there looking at Scotland in the distance while 'M' was sitting in the car? It look like he was taking a piss! And ultimately thats what this movie is doing.... just standing there pissing in the wind.
Nov 13 - 06:35 AM
If that's what you saw, that's your problem... a lot of people saw something different. So that's our incentive on the movie.
Nov 13 - 09:10 AM
@Andrew...man more concise words have ever been struck about a movie. I just don't understand the fervor over this particular Bond entry...and it scares me because OTHER directors are going to use this model for THEIR movies under the guise of "Success".
Nov 13 - 09:50 AM
@Andrew...it's funny that you mentioned the "pissing scene", because I casually whispered that EXACT same observation out loud enough that a woman next to me started to giggle...
Nov 13 - 09:52 AM
I thought it had a great story. What more could we ask for? Was there not enough explosions on screen for you?
Nov 11 - 08:36 PM
Then you must have really low standards? The only thing remotely engaging was the typical bond music montage. The rest appeared to have been filmed off of a Bond checklist. Bond - Check, Chase scene - Check, Bond standing in melancholy and bereaved on the highest corner of the tallest building in London - Check. Hot ...
This movie was narcolepsy-inducing to the well read.
Nov 11 - 08:59 PM
It had excellent performances (and I mean those of Craig and Dench), a story that prefers cleverness and humanity over hot girls and big explosions (see the film's title), and a good resolution. It's not a perfect film, it's unevenly paced, sometimes silly, and extremely fake. I respect your opinion, but I disagree almost entirely.
Nov 12 - 11:57 AM
My take on the glaring problems of this movie - Outlined:
Yes, no possible way the movie was mediocre.
1.shit Q
2. pop-psychology villain
3. no girl worth remembering
4. CG lizards...I mean really? Lucas probably spotted his shorts when he saw that?
5. what is with the island? no context (20 seconds of dialogue when you're already on the island is not enough). It's just a random set piece without any felt connection
6. no context for the assassin, the assassination, the kidnapped girl
7. computer "hacking" is not interesting
8. locales shifted too fast and were not interesting - audience was not given a chance to mentally "live" in them
9. cheap gadgets (radio looked like a chinese plastic toy, gun has 3 giant LEDs - how subtle)
10. most of the scenes with bardem were just cheesy (looking at you court-room shootout, interrogation while at MI6, shootout at skyfall mansion, etc)
This film had so many glaring problems.
Nov 12 - 01:11 PM
Well that's a nice opinion, but I enjoyed it quite a bit and so did the majority of people. Problem?
Nov 11 - 08:32 PM
Again, nice opinion. Glad most people disagree and it's the most successful bond release ever.
Nov 12 - 01:53 PM
Most people are just bored to tears and looking for anything to fill up the empty voids in their real lives...and this film was a cheap, temporary substitute for it. Einstein was correct in saying that technology is going to make people less than they COULD be. Still though it doesn't take away from the glaring fact that this movie was really bad.
Nov 12 - 02:19 PM
Tj contradicted himself there with the Einstein quote. He complains that the gadjets are cheap, and then agrees 'that technology is going to make people less than they COULD be.' So then isn't it a good thing Bond didn't use technologically advanced devices and weapons, or it would have made him less than he COULD be?
And to Tj Swafford: No. Most people aren't that bored to tears these days to have to pay tickets for a film they won't enjoy. They have the internet, sports, video games, sex, etc. If it was truly that bad, it wouldn't have a 91% approval rating from the users on this site either.
You are just part of the minority here. Deal with it.
Nov 12 - 03:00 PM
And? I bet you own a "Kony2012" bracelet, don't you? This Bond film was one of the most disjointed, horribly written messes I have ever seen from the Bond genre. It had the emotional impact of an unplugged toaster. This kinda reminds me of all the people who were blogging about how amazing "Redtails" was...and that movie was equally dreadful in my opinion.
Nov 12 - 09:19 PM
I don't own a Kony2012 bracelet, and even if I did I don't see what that would have anything to do with your view on this film.
You have pretty much made it clear on this forum how much this film deeply offends you, to the point where you must continuously bash it. My point was simply that you are in the 9% of the users here that disapprove. You hate this Bond, and that is good for you, but I hardly see why you would have to be proud of hating it.
That, and that you contradicted yourself earlier.
Nov 12 - 11:27 PM
Log in with Facebook to share your reviews with friends, create a want-to-see list, and more!
Rosalinda Ursery
i also love the james bond movie and also Daniel Craig
May 6 - 04:22 PM