Average Rating: 7.2/10
Reviews Counted: 22
Fresh: 20 | Rotten: 2
No consensus yet.
Average Rating: 7.1/10
Critic Reviews: 14
Fresh: 12 | Rotten: 2
No consensus yet.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.6/5
User Ratings: 1,304
Get your friends' movie recommendations by adding Rotten Tomatoes to your Facebook Timeline.
In the 2004 presidential election, Ohio became the state that decided who would lead the nation for the next four years; throughout the campaign, both George W. Bush and John Kerry realized it was a key "swing state" which could go to either candidate, and they devoted much of their time and resources to bringing in the vote in the Buckeye state. The controversies of the 2000 election led many to suspect that voter fraud could be a possibility, and many were watchful for tampering of voting
Oct 4, 2006 Wide
Feb 13, 2007
IFC Films
All Critics (22) | Top Critics (14) | Fresh (21) | Rotten (2) | DVD (5)
This informative documentary offers a sound, if uninspiring lesson in civics.
Documentarians Adam Del Deo and James Stern present a cogent and comprehensive postmortem of the 2004 presidential election in Ohio.
The film's triple thesis is that elections are run badly, Democrats are often clueless and Republicans are clever. Maybe -- but that still leaves too many unanswered questions.
Directors James D. Stern and Adam Del Deo make Ohio a confounding crucible of the American political machine and a microcosm of the country's cultural and socioeconomic fractures.
Supported by commentary from both Republican and Democratic operatives, the movie confirms what most of us have known all along: Electability is all about staying on message. The truth and verifiability of that message is something else again.
Filmmakers James D. Stern and Adam Del Deo captured fascinating glimpses of the action leading up to the election, as well as the Monday morning quarterbacking (from Republicans and Democrats) about what went wrong or right.
A fair warning that the world is watching to see whether Karl Rove and company put their thumbs on the scales again.
This shocking, though patently partisan, expose' makes a convincing case that wholesale irregularities came into play in the State of Ohio on Election Day 2004.
Um olhar imparcial sobre as estratégias de democratas e republicanos durante a eleição presidencial de 2004, o filme buca analisar os erros e acertos que conduziram à reeleição de Bush, oferecendo respostas inteligentes e, muitas vezes, surpreendentes.
An unpretty picture of the 2004 Presidential election campaign animated by big money, power politics, negative campaign ads, and hatred.
From its riveting opening to its gripping conclusion, . . . So Goes the Nation is arguably the most intelligent, kinetic analysis of the modern election process since The War Room.
A strikingly mature, but no less passionate, counterpoint to many of the season's angrier political documentaries.
A well done documentary about the electoral process, specifically in Ohio. While it could be a little clearer about the overall campaigning system, there are far too many documentaries which cover that process. Instead, it takes a broader strategic view, uses the 2004 elections as a case study, and puts many of the
December 14, 2007Super Reviewer
A very interesting look at our nation's voting perference. The movie is unbiased but does seem to cover more of the democratic side of the election. It goes on to explain and show how the John Kerry and the democrats litterly gave the election away. I am a very liberally person, and do admit that the Bush campaign was
August 7, 2007
| 29% | The Vow |
| 94% | Mission: Impossible Ghost Protoc... |
| 87% | The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo |
| 28% | Underworld Awakening |
| 85% | Chronicle |
| 65% | The Woman in Black |
| 25% | This Means War |
| 94% | The Secret World of Arrietty |
| 36% | Red Tails |
| 88% | Certified Copy (Copie Conforme) |
Red Tails, This Means War
Pictures: Wes Anderson films
Video: Your friendly four minute preview
Trailer: The legend continues!