South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut - Movie Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes

South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut Reviews

Page 1 of 5
Robin Clifford
Reeling Reviews
April 9, 2005
It fails miserably.
Full Review | Original Score: D+
Top Critic
Chris Vognar
Dallas Morning News
January 1, 2000
A few good jokes for every dozen groaners!
Thomas Delapa
Boulder Weekly
July 9, 2004
Like listening to a profane rant by kids stricken with Tourette's syndrome.
Jim Judy
Screen It!
January 1, 2000
The profanity for profanity's sake approach shows a lack of imagination when many in the past have used similar vulgarities with far more amusing and creatively pleasant results.
Kate Manning
Palo Alto Weekly
May 20, 2003
Vulgar and tasteless as usual, but most definitely longer and, quite obviously, to its detriment, uncut.
| Original Score: 2.5/4
Steve Rhodes
Internet Reviews
January 1, 2000
A quarter of an hour would have been plenty of time with these tart-tongued tiny tots.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/4
Robert Roten
Laramie Movie Scope
January 1, 2001
There are some good visuals and a fairly good storyline, but all of these qualities are very uneven. Nothing, except high energy and edginess, are maintained very long.
Full Review | Original Score: C+
James Kendrick
Q Network Film Desk
February 27, 2001
The satirical message is that the moral defenders of impressionable American youth would literally rather see violent death than obscenity, but Parker and Stone end up delivering both in overabundant quantities to prove their point.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Sarah Hepola
Austin Chronicle
January 1, 2000
You can't shake the feeling that 60 minutes of comedy has been stretched and teased and goosed to make 80 minutes of movie.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/5
Jeff Vice
Deseret News, Salt Lake City
January 1, 2000
80 minutes of this boring animated comedy/musical feels so long that it will seriously test any moviegoer's patience!
David Luty
Film Journal International
January 1, 2000
It is abundantly clear that Parker and Stone desperately want to be, or at least appear to be, subversive, but for the most part, this is kiddie subversion.
Gary Brown
Houston Community Newspapers
January 1, 2000
Hollywood can't get much raunchier than this, can it? If there's a buck to be made, it will.
Full Review | Original Score: C-
Top Critic
Steven Rosen
Denver Post
January 1, 2000
South Park is profoundly stupid, but given the times it has guts.
Sue Pierman
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
January 1, 2000
Naughty words and images pile up like bodies in a Schwarzenegger movie until viewers are numbed by it all. And that's within the first half-hour.
Top Critic
Rod Dreher
New York Post
January 1, 2000
The quite clever satirical moments in this crudely animated filth fest, though, are not remotely worth being dragged through the cinematic sewer.
Top Critic
Julie Hinds
San Jose Mercury News
January 1, 2000
Irreverent, gross and childish!
Mark Halverson
Sacramento News & Review
August 7, 2008
Nastier than it is subversive or funny.
Full Review | Original Score: 2/5
Top Critic

Time Out
February 9, 2006
Genuinely outrageous and sometimes hilarious -- but size does eventually matter, and all-rounder Trey Parker just can't keep it up for the full 81 minutes.
Top Critic
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
January 1, 2000
The year's most slashing political commentary is not in the new films by Oliver Stone, David Lynch or John Sayles, but in an animated comedy about obscenity.
Full Review | Original Score: 2.5/4
Top Critic
James Berardinelli
January 1, 2000
While there aren't more than a handful of gut-busting, laugh-aloud moments, there is enough sly, slick humor to keep the average viewer chuckling throughout.
Full Review | Original Score: 3/4
Sam Adams
Philadelphia City Paper
January 1, 2000

Irish Times
January 1, 2000

Sight and Sound
June 18, 2012
Page 1 of 5