Critic Review - Zertinet Movies

This is not a good movie, but a mediocre means of passing a few hours. It is a classic example of money and special effects diluting artistic vision and talent.

March 5, 2003 Full Review Source: Zertinet Movies | Comments (7)
Zertinet Movies

Comments

naughtynaught12

balls mcgee

Who the hell watches a superhero movie for artistic value?

Apr 28 - 06:35 AM

Zachary P.

Zachary P

I agree with naughtynaught12 also, i thought this movie was awesome.It didn't need to be deep.

TDK broke the mold, though. It was action-packed and also very artistic.

May 3 - 08:26 AM

PennsylvaniaJames

Tory Pinto

I agree with naughtynaught12. Superhero movies are meant to be fun, and Spiderman 1 and 2 are about the most fun superhero movies out there.

Apr 28 - 04:50 PM

Spidey-Guy

Nick Cagnetti

Which is why SM and SM2 are the best.

Jul 28 - 12:46 AM

mjackso6

Michael Jackson

What exactly is a good movie then? Some artsy-fartsy piece of trash that most of us wouldn't be able to stay awake through?

Nov 23 - 03:57 PM

Sam P.

Sam Panarese

I thought the special effects carried the movie. Tobey Maguire's a total loser and the plot and dialogue were cornier than they needed to be. The special effects were the only thing that made it fun to watch

Apr 29 - 10:07 AM

Bobby Smith

Bobby Smith

This was a superhero film about the most popular superhero and do you know why he is soo popular? I believe it is because of this film (and the cool super powers you would want to have as a child).

Oct 8 - 01:10 AM

Find us on:                 
Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | Press | API | Licensing | Mobile