Weekly Ketchup: Good News for Green Lantern, Bad News for Spider-Man

Plus Tom Hanks returns to the director's chair.

This week's Ketchup covers big developments in the world of comic book movies (Spider-Man, Green Lantern and The Savage Dragon), as well as new roles for Daniel Craig, Leonardo DiCaprio, Zach Galifianakis, Tom Hanks and Mark Wahlberg.


FRESH DEVELOPMENTS


#1 GREEN LANTERN CASTS HIS LIGHT ON THREE POTENTIAL SUPER VILLAINS

This was a big week for the casting of Warner Bros and DC Comics' Green Lantern, the next great hope for the comic book publisher to take on their main competitor, Marvel. First, Blake Lively (Gossip Girl) was cast as Carol Ferris. Ferris is the aerospace industry executive that is Hal Jordan's (Ryan Reynolds) boss when he first is given the power ring that makes him the new Green Lantern of Sector 2814 (which includes Earth). In the comics, Ferris also eventually becomes Star Sapphire, the latest woman to wield a purple gem that gives her powers similar to those of a Green Lantern (although that title was also held by other characters, and is not Carol Ferris' only distinction). Next up was Peter Sarsgaard (Boys Don't Cry, Jarhead), who has been cast as Hector Hammond, who gains psychic powers when he encounters a strange meteor. Hammond's background is also being changed from the comics (where he was just a petty criminal) to being a pathologist and the son of a senator who sees him as a disappointment. The trades referred to Hammond as "the villain" of Green Lantern, but that doesn't mean that Hal's most famous villain won't be in the movie; Hitfix is reporting that Jackie Earle Haley (Watchmen, the upcoming Nightmare on Elm Street remake) is still Warner Bros' "only choice" to play Sinestro. What may be the distinction is that Sinestro may not begin as a villain (just like how Carol Ferris has a background other than eventually becoming Star Sapphire), but as a fellow Green Lantern, as he was in the comics, before eventually switching to a yellow power ring that has extra power against green lantern rings. Green Lantern starts filming in Louisiana in March, aiming for a release on June 17, 2010.


#2 JAMES BOND REPLACING TONY STARK IN COWBOYS & ALIENS

The week got to a start with the news that Robert Downey, Jr. had dropped out of Cowboys & Aliens, which would have reunited him with Iron Man and Iron Man 2 director Jon Favreau. The project didn't have to wait long for a replacement, however, as Daniel Craig is now in negotiations with DreamWorks for the role. If he signs, Craig would be playing Zeke Johnson, an Arizona cowboy who must put aside his differences with the local Apache Indians when an alien spaceship crashes in the middle of the Wild West. Some sources call Cowboys & Aliens a comic book adaptation, but although it is true that the comic book was published in 2006, the movie has actually been in development in Hollywood for over 10 years, and the comic adaptation just happened to get published first (and was probably seen as a way to help get the movie made). The current script for Cowboys & Aliens was written by Damon Lindelof (LOST), Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman (cowriters of Transformers), and together, the three writers cowrote Star Trek.


#3 THE RETURN OF THE MOHAWK IN THE A-TEAM PAVES THE WAY FOR THE SAVAGE DRAGON

Recently, comic book writer and creator Erik Larsen made an announcement that went mostly unnoticed by the movie business, and so this is something of a scoop here. Larsen goes rather in depth about the development of the script for a Savage Dragon movie (in what should be of interest to any fan of movies based upon comic books), although the business details (studio, director, etc) are what Larsen doesn't yet reveal. Here's what we do know, however: The Savage Dragon was one of the original titles that launched the owner-created Image Comics publisher in 1993, and with Spawn, is the only such original Image comic that is still being published. The Dragon is a superheroic police officer with green skin, a massive finned mohawk on his head, super strength and healing and amnesia that (until recently) kept his origin a mystery. The Savage Dragon was also adapted as an animated TV series that aired on the USA Network from 1995 to 1996, at the height of success of the Image Comics characters. Larsen says that the movie script is based upon the original comic book, up until the events of #21, but as Larsen describes, many details of those 20+ issues have to be left out, as the typical movie script could only adapt about 5 comic book issues (much less 20+).


#4 FILE UNDER UNLIKELY SEQUELS: FIVE BROTHERS

Paramount Pictures is developing a sequel to the 2005 thriller Four Brothers, which is going by the unexpected title (given the premise of the first movie) of Five Brothers. In Four Brothers, Mark Wahlberg, Andre Benjamin, Tyrese Gibson and Garrett Hedlund starred as four adopted brothers of different ethnic backgrounds who reunite following the death of their mother during a robbery. Mark Wahlberg came up with the idea for the sequel, and will return to star, along with at least some of the other costars of the original (presumably), and apparently, at least one new costar to be the new fifth brother. David Elliot and Paul Lovett, who wrote Four Brothers (and they also cowrote G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra), are also cowriting Five Brothers. There's no word yet as to whether director John Singleton (2 Fast 2 Furious, Shaft) will also return for this sequel.


#5 TOM HANKS RETURNS TO DIRECTING FOR LARRY CROWNE

Tom Hanks is directing again for the first time since the nostalgic fun of 1996's That Thing You Do!. He'll be doing it with Larry Crowne, a comedy script that he also wrote, and he'll also star along with his Charlie's Wilson War costar Julia Roberts. Hanks will star as Larry Crowne, "a man forced to reinvent himself and find a new career as he navigates the second act of his life." This will be Hanks' first movie role as an actor since last year's Angels and Demons, and it will be Julia Roberts' follow up to this summer's Eat, Pray, Love. A studio hasn't been found yet for the movie, but filming of Larry Crowne will begin in Los Angeles in April.



#6 THE BEATLES COME TOGETHER AGAIN IN YELLOW SUBMARINE

Robert Zemeckis has found the four British actors who are in talks to star as the Beatles in the 3D CGI animated remake of Yellow Submarine, using performance-capture technology to make the actors look like the Beatles they are portraying, as most of them don't bear direct resemblances to the Beatles in question. The new Beatles lineup is Dean Lennox Kelly (William Shakespeare in that episode of Doctor Who) as John Lennon, Peter Serafinowicz (Pete the Zombie, from Shaun of the Dead)as Paul McCartney, Cary Elwes (The Princess Bride) as George Harrison and Adam Campbell (Harper's Island, Epic Movie) as Ringo Starr. However, these four actors won't be performing all of the scenes featuring the band; Zemeckis has recruited the Beatles tribute band The Fab Four for the musical performance sequences. At least the music will be genuine, because Zemeckis and Disney have licensed the actual Beatles songs (16 in total) for the movie. If Disney's remake is staying faithful to the original animated movie, however, the involvement of the Fab Four will probably be minimal, as most of the songs were not shown as being performed, but rather as the background music as the Beatles had their adventures in Pepperland, encountering the Blue Meanies and all that.


#7 LEONARDO DICAPRIO TO AUTHOR THE CHANCELLOR MANUSCRIPT

Paramount Pictures has hired director Marc Forster (Quantum of Solace, Finding Neverland) for their adaptation of the Robert Ludlum (The Bourne Identity) novel The Chancellor Manuscript, with Leonardo DiCaprio attached to star, presumably as the title character. Peter O'Brien, whose screenplay Unlocked made the 2008 Blacklist (an annual industry list of top reviewed unproduced screenplays), and also wrote the story for the upcoming HALO: Reach videogame, has been hired to adapt Ludlum's novel. The Chancellor Manuscript is the story of political novelist Peter Chancellor (DiCaprio) whose latest book is close enough to the possible truth surrounding the formation of U.S. policies (in Ludlum's book, it involved the death of J. Edgar Hoover) that a secret group decides that Chancellor may know too much to be allowed to survive. Ludlum is a hot author himself (and a cold one, having died in 2001) right now, with adaptations of The Matarese Circle, The Parsifal Mosaic and The Sigma Protocol also in development, and Paramount paid $4 million in 2005 for the rights to The Chancellor Manuscript. In other DiCaprio news this week, the actor has also signed on with Warner Bros to narrate Hubble 3D, the IMAX space documentary that debuts on March 19, 2010.


#8 RUDD AND GALIFIANAKIS WILL COSTAR TOGETHER TWICE

Paul Rudd (I Love You, Man) and Zach Galifianakis (The Hangover) recently wrapped up Dinner for Schmucks, a Paramount comedy in which they costar with Steve Carell and Bruce Greenwood (Star Trek), and now they have signed with the studio to star in another comedy, Will. This marks just the latest in a string of new projects for Galifianakis, whose agent is really taking advantage of the success of The Hangover, with Galifianakis currently filming Due Date with Robert Downey, Jr. Will "follows an ordinary guy (Rudd) who lives in a world where people's lives and destinies are being written by scribes in Heaven. The man wakes up one day to find that his heavenly writer (Galifianakis) has decided to no longer draft his life, and he must go about his day unscripted." Valerie Faris and Jonathan Dayton, the directors of Little Miss Sunshine, will be making their studio debuts with Will, working from a script by Demetri Martin (The Daily Show with Jon Stewart).


ROTTEN IDEAS OF THE WEEK


#2 WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOUR GIRLFRIEND WANTS TO GO TO THE MOVIES

Lionsgate has acquired the rights to the bestselling 1984 pregnancy self-help book What to Expect When You're Expecting by Heidi Murkoff, which went on to inspire a massive book franchise of over a dozen other books, such as What to Expect When Your Mommy's Having a Baby, What to Expect at Preschool and What to Expect Before You're Expecting. With 2009 marking the original book's 25th anniversary, there are now mothers reading it whose own mother read it when they were pregnant with them. Heather Hach, the cowriter of the 2003 Freaky Friday remake (and she's also writing the upcoming sequel, Freaky Monday), has been hired to adapt the non-fiction book into a "wildly original romantic comedy [that] follows the relationships of seven couples as they experience the thrills, terrors, surprises, aches and pains of preparing to embark on life's biggest journey: parenthood." This concept is getting pegged as a Rotten Idea because movies based upon non-fiction "self help books" are not that different from movies based on board games; in both case, there is no inherent story that is being adapted. Although this might be a good movie, it might not be, and so this writer's cynical side pegs it as a Rotten Idea until proven otherwise.


#1 READY FOR THE WEBB OF SPIDER-MAN?

Just two years after Spider-Man 3 brought in $890 million worldwide, Sony has pulled the plug on Spider-Man 4, and will instead focus on a rebooting of the superhero franchise in the summer of 2011. This story got its start when Sam Raimi left the project over pressure from the studio to get Spider-Man 4 done in time for a summer, 2011 release, which Raimi felt he could not accomplish and "keep the film's creative integrity" (quoting Deadline.com, not Raimi). Raimi's departure followed a few months of constantly changing rumors about what Spider-Man 4 might have been about, which eventually included John Malkovich as the Vulture (good) and Anne Hathaway as a new character called the Vulturess (bad). Now, everything is potentially out the window as Sony restarts from scratch, including Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst and (most likely) all of the great supporting actors that Raimi brought into the Spider-Man franchise (J.K. Simmons, Rosemary Harris, Dylan Baker, etc). The new Spider-Man will be written by James Vanderbilt (Zodiac; cowriter of the upcoming The Losers), and will focus yet again "on a teenager grappling with both contemporary human problems and amazing super-human crises," turning the clock back on Peter Parker and putting him back in high school, rather than being a college student nearing his mid-20s. With Raimi's departure, the rumor mill got a quick start this week on who might replace him, with Marc Webb, whose (500) Days of Summer was an indie hit this past summer, having already met with Sony about the job. Others directors that are reportedly on Sony's wish list for rebooting Spider-Man include James Cameron (who once upon a time was actually working on Spider-Man, way before Raimi), David Fincher (who worked with Vanderbilt on Zodiac) and Wes Anderson (Rushmore). Although this is without a doubt the biggest story of the week, Sony's rebooting of Spider-Man is at the bottom as a Rotten Idea because the back story seems to be one of studio pressure on Sam Raimi to make a movie he didn't want to make, with roots going all the way back to Spider-Man 3, and the decision to include Venom, rather than Raimi's choice of the Vulture. And now Sony wants to de-age Peter Parker, rather than allowing the character to age with experience, which has to be seen as an attempt to attract teen audiences (especially girls) with what will probably be a hot young actor rather than the (intentionally) nerdy Tobey Maguire. If there is good news about all of this, it's that Sam Raimi may now be a lot closer to moving onto his next big movie, the potentially awesome eye candy of Warcraft, which is set in such an immersive world full of rich mythology and lore that it might just be the next step up after what James Cameron delivered with Avatar.


For more Weekly Ketchup columns by Greg Dean Schmitz, check out the WK archive, and you can contact GDS through his MySpace page or via a RT forum message.

Comments

DivineCC

Bill Pyle

The release date you have for Green Lantern can not be correct.

Jan 15 - 01:01 PM

Alexson Philip

Alexson Philipiah

ye it says theyre startin now and its comin out in june.

Jan 15 - 01:36 PM

Bed Head

Ekaterina Kutznetsova

IMO, neither "Will" nor "Larry Crowne" feel very fresh at all, actually. Both seem like they've already been done countless times before.

Meanwhile, the "Savage Dragon" movie (though more "original", I suppose) simply sounds completely retarded.

Jan 15 - 01:11 PM

mjprogue

Mike PArker

The only potential good that could come out of the Spidey cancellation would be if it meant no movie got made at all so Marvel could get the web-slinger back...and no way is that gonna happen.

This studio is run by morons...

Oh and Savage Dragon is freaking awesome...best comic news I've heard since Iron Man...

Jan 15 - 01:15 PM

inactive user

Jared King

"Spider-Man" reboot is a horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE idea. Just let the series rest for the next two decades.

And by the way, "Metal Gear Solid" film that was in the works, has been cancelled. Tey said the 80 million budget wasn't enough. At least that means they're putting effort into it.

Jan 15 - 01:25 PM

inactive user

Jared King

*Tey is they. And I meant to say the Spider-Man reboot is a horrible, horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE idea.

Jan 15 - 01:27 PM

Throw An Onion

Joshua Mills

Spider Man 4 will be rotten if they don't bring back JK Simmons. If they get a good director and bring Simmons back maybe we'll get a good film. Or maybe the studio will rush it out and it will be absolutely horrendous. If it is horrible Zemeckis can set loose the blue meanies on the studio executives who green lit the project.

Jan 15 - 01:25 PM

August M.

Agustin Macias

Well at least Green Lantern is going on ahead. And good call on canceling Metal Gear Solid.

Jan 15 - 01:40 PM

bigdaddygamer14

Chris Stuckmann

To fans who are mad about the Spider-Man reboot:
http://www.PetitionOnline.com/s4sam/petition.html

Jan 15 - 02:05 PM

Nine Oh Two

joe schmoe

To those people who have a life:
http://www.letitgo.com/notreallyabigdeal/spiderman.html

When was the last time you saw a filmmaker direct 4 installments of a series? If you would have told me Sam Raimi was gonna do spiderman 4, then I would have been surprised. I would rather see him move on to different things, even if it is a World of Warcraft movie.

Admit it, the Spiderman series was getting stale. We only have a vague idea of what the reboot will be like, how can you even begin to protest it? I say, bring in a young filmmaker with a fresh perspective.

Jan 15 - 02:18 PM

inactive user

Jared King

And I say there are WAY too many reboots going on, and about half of them are in the comic book world.

Jan 15 - 02:34 PM

August M.

Agustin Macias

Thanks for the link! I'm with you.

Jan 15 - 04:20 PM

Kellen F.

Kellen Frost

I totally agree. and found Sam Raimi was provided way to much creative freedom, to the point where dark spiderman was a camp, lets look and laugh at joke. That being said, the new angle for the franchise also sounds like ****.

Aw well, Franchises are franchises because at the end of the day it's all about money. they will always get *****ed in the end.

Jan 18 - 12:43 AM

Jim M.

Jim Mattes

I agree with the first post--the date has to be wrong. Not enough time for all the inevitable special effects. Must be 2011.

Jan 15 - 02:32 PM

Jim M.

Jim Mattes

I agree with the first post--the date has to be wrong. Not enough time for all the inevitable special effects. Must be 2011.

Jan 15 - 02:33 PM

Escapefromalcatraz

william thresher

I hate to be the Four Brothers nerd, but one of the brothers was killed off in the big shoot-out at the house (after getting hit by a snowball) so they're gonna need TWO new co-stars, not one.

Jan 15 - 03:00 PM

Steve R.

Jared Ashkenaz

Spider-man 3 was closer to 3 years ago...nitpicky.

And they cancelled Spider-man 4 immediately when Raimi left, I think. I don't think there was a time when we thought someone else was gonna direct 4.

And 5 Brothers? Wow! First of all, that's pretty gimmicky and predictable to call it that. And why would that even make sense? Do they adopt another brother? (Unless something happened in the first movie; I didn't ee all of it)

Jan 15 - 03:05 PM

J W.

J W

Way too early for a reboot of spiderman. Having the whole origin story told again is pointless when you can just watch Raimi's initial spiderman.

Jan 15 - 03:33 PM

TheInglouriousCritic

5 4

Please God don't let Zack Efron be Spiderman! I can live with a reboot after that bull**** Spiderman 3 I can except that they're going back to the origin story as long as it's over in the blink of an eye and they tie it in with iron man and the hulk but on my hands and knees I say Hollywood please don't rape spiderman anymore than you already have let this character have some dignety remaining! One more thing if Sam made the next one there was no doubt in my mind it would suck because lets face it he was running out of ideas and villians.

Jan 15 - 03:57 PM

The.Watcher

The Watcher

Damn!
Punctuation, dude! You're gushing.

Jan 15 - 04:23 PM

MADDAZ

Darren Anderson

Scrap the whole spidey reboot idea and find some other new super hero franchise. The studio should have listened to Raimi and now all it looks like is greed from the studio. Now were likely to get some piece of crap movie that has lost alot of its fan base due this stupid rebooting idea. They will reboot it again if its a flop, guaranteed.

Jan 15 - 04:09 PM

dethburger

dethburger hates Flixster

I want to see them cast Seth Green as Peter Parker.

Jan 15 - 05:29 PM

JRM

Raul M

Michael Cera's gonna be Spider-Man if Sony doesn't get their hands on Zach Effron. lol.

Jan 15 - 05:39 PM

Eric K.

Eric Knight

"Green Lantern starts filming in Louisiana in March, aiming for a release on June 17, 2010."

What, no way they can do it that fast!

Jan 15 - 05:40 PM

greg_dean_schmitz

Greg Dean Schmitz

Hey gang, thanks for noticing the typo on the Green Lantern release date, but I don't have the ability to edit the article to fix it. Hopefully the rest of the comments won't be 10 people all pointing it out. :)

And now I'll point out the other typo that no one has noticed yet... Sony is actually planning on releasing their Spider-Man reboot in 2012, not 2011. Which makes the reason for Raimi leaving (that he couldn't get the movie done in time for 2011)... sort of funny.

Jan 15 - 05:42 PM

rac-shade

Andrew Mullen

"rather than the (intentionally) nerdy Tobey Maguire."

And that right there is why Sam Raimi was the wrong director for Spiderman. He never got the character and 3 movies later was still making the character a nerdy goofball klutz.

Peter Parker has (historically) been one of the few well adjusted and stable superheros BECAUSE his powers gave him the self esteem and confidence he lacked. Once he gets his powers he is no longer a dweeb. He was married to a supermodel for 20 years for goodness sake.

And I refuse to side with Raimi over the studio about Spiderman 3. He should have figured out how to make a GOOD Venom based movie like the studio wanted him to do all along instead of fighting them tooth and nail because he didn't like the character.

They wanted Venom, they owned Spiderman, make the movie they want or quit. Instead he made a half-assed Sandman movie and a quarter-assed Venom movie that just recycled the vast majority of the same scenes and themes from #1 and #2 while spitting on the others (making Peter a full out murderer because WHOOPS he killed the wrong guy, was a baffling decision).

Jan 15 - 06:32 PM

ColinTheCimmerian

Colin Hay

Good post rac-shade. Agreed that Raimi and Maguire never did get the Parker character right, and big agreement on the Venom/Sandman issue. Venom was a much better choice for a villain; I think some people just have it in their heads that the studio is always the bad guy and the director is always right. Maybe it has to do with this being a movie site and people watching too many movies with evil corporations and underdog protagonists. The fact of the matter is, when a producer or studio exec pushes for something, it's not to antagonize the director; there's nothing malicious about it and they aren't trying to ruin the movie. They push for something because they think it's a good idea. They aren't always right, not by a long shot, but they aren't always wrong either. The director can make mistakes too. In this case, I think Avi Arad and Sony were right to want Venom in the movie, and I think Raimi was wrong to insist on putting Sandman in it too. Green Goblin and Doc Ock followed a similar model in that they were both men transformed by accidents involving experimental technology. Neither were evil men prior to the accident but after their respective accidents they turn to a life of crime. Neither has any particular beef with Spider-man, until he gets in their way. Both at times appear to have more sheer offensive power than Spidey, but his own varied abilities act as a good counter and he manages to beat them. Sandman ended up following the same basic model; despite being a convict, he's actually not a bad person, but then he gets caught in an experiment, gets some super powers, lets them go to his head a bit and turns back to crime. He's got nothing against Spider-man, but Spidey picks a fight with him and they duke it out. I think even if Raimi hadn't been forced to include Venom and just went with Sandman, the movie would have felt underwhelming and would have been the weakest entry; a Sandman vs Spidey movie would just be Spider-man 1 and 2 all over again with a villain with more ridiculous and unbelievable powers and less personality.
Venom, on the other hand, should/would/could have been a nice change if he'd actually been done properly; I think a Venom-focused movie would have been a refreshing departure from the first two movies. A villain whose abilities are alien in origin rather than the result of yet another experimental mishap. A villain who has a grudge against Spider-man from the get-go, who's more interested in hurting Spidey than he is in robbing banks or committing acts of terrorism. In the first two movies the bad guys (either common crooks or the main villains) were always going about their business, whatever nefarious act it might be, and Spider-man would show up and intercede, he was the hunter. With Venom around, Spider-man would become the hunted. Having a scary-looking creature jumping out of the shadows would introduce a bit of a suspense/horror element, something that wasn't really possible with a guy dressed as a goblin riding around on a rocket-powered sled or a fat guy in a trenchcoat and glasses and four robotic arms; the villains were too over-the-top to be frightening. The fact that Venom has all of Spidey's powers, and doesn't trigger his spider-sense would present a new kind of challenge to Spider-man; his abilities become less of an asset when facing an equal, so he'd be forced to rely on his intelligence and resourcefulness to win. Raimi ever so briefly touched on the horror and power-equality concepts in the brief scene where Spider-man first faces Venom alone. You see the fear in Parker's eyes when he realizes Venom can do everything he can, and that he can't sense the danger coming like he's used to. He knows he doesn't have the advantages he's become accustomed to. It was probably my favourite part of the movie and I would have liked to see more of that, but unfortunately the next time they face each other it's in the stupid 4-way free-for-all.

I guess I just feel like a third movie that focused on Venom could have actually been really good and I think it's a shame that Raimi couldn't see that and instead seemed to want to take the same-old-same-old approach with Sandman. This is why I tend to side against Raimi on the Spider-man 3 issue; the producers may have overstepped their bounds in insisting on Venom's inclusion, but dammit, they were right to do so, it was the right way to go. If Raimi had really tried, I think he could have made a spectacular Venom-as-main-villain movie (especially considering his proficiency with horror films), but it doesn't seem like he *wanted* to try. I think if more people looked at the issue in terms of which villain was actually the better choice, there'd be more people supporting the producers; but too many folks are hung up on the concept of the 'Big Bad Studio' and can't see past it.

Jan 15 - 08:22 PM

King Thor

Chris Kalmin

@ColintheCimmerian

amazing post, I could not have said it better myself.

Idk how ppl don't see how ridiculously similar the spiderman movies were. I'm pretty sure raimi in complete control is not a good thing either. The more he got his way, the more ridiculous scenes there were.

Jan 16 - 11:35 AM

King Thor

Chris Kalmin

@ColintheCimmerian

amazing post, I could not have said it better myself.

Idk how ppl don't see how ridiculously milar the spiderman movies were. I'm pretty sure raimi in complete control is not a good thing either. The more he got his way, the more ridiculous scenes there were.

Jan 16 - 11:36 AM

Quorwyf

Elliott Watson

I'm not having luck w/ the reply feature so i'll do this manually.

"Peter Parker has (historically) been one of the few well adjusted and stable superheros BECAUSE his powers gave him the self esteem and confidence he lacked. Once he gets his powers he is no longer a dweeb. He was married to a supermodel for 20 years for goodness sake."

Yes and no. His confidence and self esteem were things he grew into but he never stopped being a nerd, even after marrying a supermodel. His nerdiness was fairly clamped down about halfway through his college years tho, even if hes prone to thinking like a chemistry nerd..on a side note, some writer really needs to get around to writing Flash Thompson as something beyond Petey's constant tormentor. The main failing in the portrayal this far has been Pete never advancing beyond socially inept. And having organic webshooters..can't resist picking at that even now.

"And I refuse to side with Raimi over the studio about Spiderman 3. He should have figured out how to make a GOOD Venom based movie like the studio wanted him to do all along instead of fighting them tooth and nail because he didn't like the character. "

Again, half agreement. If they had written Venom closer to the comic, as a fusion of a guy who hated Spidey so badly that he wanted him dead yet felt so depressed over the humiliations Spidey dealt him that he was on the brink of killing himself that night in the chapel and an alien spawn that wanted to destroy Peter for rejecting him, then he would have been a great villain. Instead we got a whiney bastard wrapped in black goo.

"You can buy a teenager who's too stupid to even get the marketing rights for his own Superhero merchandise, but it's kind of hard to swallow a 30-year-old Spiderman who lets his Aunt lose her house because he hasn't figured out yet that kids want to buy his t-shirts and action figures."

This would be my biggest issue, the movies have Peter continually stuck at a random age between 19-23, he's given the maturity to deal w/ major issues surrounding Aunt May but never mature enough to figure out the whole steady work idea. Marvel not aging their chars is no excuse for this. Another side note - it would be nice if the ppl behind the films remembered that their audience does indeed age between movies.

Other thoughts- I hope that they won't cast Efron for this. He makes sense for the few years of adjustment "cool" Spidey but just won't work for the beginning. Same reason but reversed for Cera.

funny thing, I had coherent thoughts before I started typing

Jan 17 - 09:29 PM

Ken G.

Ken Goach

Green Lantern just keeps looking better and better. If the script plays out as well as the speculation, it should be great.

Savage Dragon was an awesome comic back in the day. Very creative, edgy, funny (some dark humor too), and a bit racy at times. If done like Hellboy, it could be good.

Jan 15 - 07:01 PM

What's Hot On RT

Total Recall
Total Recall

Bradley Cooper's Best Movies

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Fast & Furious 6 is Certified Fresh

24 Frames
24 Frames

Fast & Furious cars gallery

Summer Movie Scorecard
Summer Movie Scorecard

Blockbusters ranked!

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile