ROTTEN TOMATOES: Garner Considers Alias Movie and Star Trek Comments

Garner Considers Alias Movie and Star Trek

by Fred Topel | September 10, 2007

Summary

No sooner did Alias air its series finale than rumors started flying about a feature film. Jennifer Garner has moved on to film projects and soon Broadway, but she would revive Sydney Bristow under the right circumstances. Back to Article

(1-12 of 12 posts) | Reply

adml_shake writes:
on Sep 10 2007 05:06 PM

Yeoman Rand perhaps? A younger Carol Marcus?

(Reply to this)

damvbat writes:
on Sep 10 2007 05:18 PM

A good use for Jennifer would be one of those blue chicks Kirk always likes

(Reply to this)

TomasSPAGHetti writes:
on Sep 10 2007 06:27 PM

mmmmm jennifer garner... mmm

(Reply to this)

Rated_Xpert writes:
on Sep 10 2007 07:55 PM

She'd be hot in the old school trek outfit with the black bowl-cut and pointy ears

(Reply to this)

sharpless writes:
on Sep 10 2007 09:47 PM

She can play a Klingon, for all I care. Do want Garner. Nom nom nom.

(Reply to this)

Ender7406 writes:
on Sep 11 2007 05:36 AM

Matt Damon? Ha! Shave Garner and she's the PERFECT Picard. You scoff now, but you'll see...

(Reply to this)

lonechicken writes:
on Sep 11 2007 07:12 AM

I liked the show, but I'm envisioning a Firefly effect with an Alias movie. Lots of die-hard fans anticipating it. A studio spends a ton of money on it. All the principals are involved in making it. It turns out good... And loses a ton of money.

(Reply to this)

Horstradamus writes:
on Sep 11 2007 02:31 PM

In reply to this comment (#1114372)
"lonechicken writes:
on Sep 11 2007 07:12 AM

I liked the show, but I'm envisioning a Firefly effect with an Alias movie. Lots of die-hard fans anticipating it. A studio spends a ton of money on it. All the principals are involved in making it. It turns out good... And loses a ton of money."

Serenity didn't lose any money. It only cost $39 million to make and grossed just over $40 million. Not a winner by any means, but it at least broke even.

http://whedonesque.com/comments/13918

(Reply to this)

TheAnswerMVP2001 writes:
on Sep 11 2007 05:52 PM

Why doesn't Abrams just cast every horrible actor and actress in the business and finish a dying franchise off. I love Star Trek, but so far with every new news item or rumor this film sounds worse and worse.

(Reply to this)

FURY.UK writes:
on Sep 12 2007 04:01 PM

The problem with STAR TREK is that its whole universe has been controlled too much by the producers of the various series. Star Trek has always been aimed at the Family market and has never been free to really develop.

I have watched all the episodes of the Original Series, Generations, DS9 and Voyager. I always felt that the franchise was too closely interferred with by Berman and Braga. Granted, they are owed some respect for keeping the Star Trek universe on the small screen, but it wasn't as risque as say, Babylon 5.

I think its about time the fans and newbies were given a real space battle with lots of ships and casualties, no glossing over the events. Gene Roddenberry would be turning over in his grave if he knew Jonathan Frakes had been allowed to direct not one but 2 Star Trek films (arghhhh).

Back to the main subject. I couldn't give a monkeys if Jennifer Gardner stars in this film!

Regards

FURY

(Reply to this)

FURY.UK writes:
on Sep 12 2007 04:03 PM

Jennifer Garner,,typo... who cares!

(Reply to this)

jeanpaul writes:
on Oct 01 2007 04:47 PM

In reply to this comment (#1114284)
Wow, you're so right, man!! I can imagine that... woh...!!!

(Reply to this)

Related Links

Star Trek

Related Articles

Most Discussed

Latest News

Latest Interviews

Latest Features

Sponsored Links