Average Rating: 4/10
Reviews Counted: 42
Fresh: 9 | Rotten: 33
Filled with dull action sequences and an underdeveloped storyline, this fifth Trek movie is probably the worst of the series.
Average Rating: 3.4/10
Critic Reviews: 7
Fresh: 0 | Rotten: 7
Filled with dull action sequences and an underdeveloped storyline, this fifth Trek movie is probably the worst of the series.
liked it
Average Rating: 2.8/5
User Ratings: 55,054
Kirk (William Shatner), McCoy (DeForest Kelley), and Spock (Leonard Nimoy) are enjoying a vacation in Yosemite National Park when duty calls. Vulcan cult leader Sybok (Laurence Luckinbill) and his followers have invaded a "planet of peace," where delegates from hostile races coexist in a sort of intergalactic United Nations. Ordered to quell the crisis, the Enterprise crew discovers that it's a ruse perpetrated by Sybok, who takes over the ship, piloting it toward the "Great Barrier," an energy
Jun 9, 1989 Wide
Apr 20, 1999
Paramount Pictures
All Critics (42) | Top Critics (7) | Fresh (9) | Rotten (36) | DVD (27)
William Shatner's inauspicious feature directing debut is a double letdown.
[The] special effects, despite the hefty budget, look strictly bargain basement.
Captain Kirk and his crew go where too many film makers have too often gone before.
Bloated, bombastic and maddeningly pretentious.
The whole point of the movie has something to do with the search for God and Eden, but the theme is presented in the most mundane fashion imaginable.
A snoozola of astronomic proportions.
Worst in series; some tricky religious content.
Easily the weakest of the original cast Star Trek films.
Final Frontier is a warmly crafted picture only lacking a sophisticated technical and dramatic finesse the earlier features held in abundance. The film is never aggressively odious, just undernourished.
I merely felt sorry for the bad guys because they always seem so angry and never have any fun. (Blu-ray Collection)
Did it really take William Shatner in the director's chair to finally give us a decent Star Trek movie?
weeeeeak
Although the film's ontological approach may be intriguing, this rather dull entry fails to generate the kind of thoughtful, exciting adventure that made the Gene Roddenberry TV series so compelling.
The worst Star Trek movie.
Proceed with caution.
...delivers all the pleasure of a plucked pubic hair.
The plot, about a quest for the Ultimate Answer, resembles something Douglas Adams would have thrown in the bin.
Shatner can be funny, but he stinks as a director.
Disappointing production, but always good to visit the old crew.
Ok, ok, yeah, you can see my rating, and I can't even begin to really defend it in any way. Having never seen Star Trek V: The Final Frontier before, I had been led to believe that it was an unwatchable pile of crap. Of course, the same was said of Star Trek: Generations, but I still managed to enjoy that... even
October 25, 2008
Super Reviewer
I agree with everyone who says that this is the worst Trek film, but I didn't end up hating it nearly as much as I was led to believe I would. Don't get me wrong, the film isn't good, but it wasn't an awful heap of poo either. It is a mediocre mess, but it is a bit entertaining, and does have its moments.The story
August 5, 2011Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures