Weekly Ketchup: Star Wars Spinoff Films Confirmed
SummaryThis week saw the movie development scene rewarded with a plague of blessings. The start of the Berlinale, one of the major film markets, provided lots of smaller announcements that would have normally made the "top ten" cut. However, they were mostly drowned out by bigger franchise stories, many of them thanks to Disney's various fanboy-friendly subsidiaries. Like the Hulk (or really, superheroes in general), animated movies, and Star Wars? This was the week for you. Back to Article

Lee Augustus
Is still think they should go with the Thrawn trilogy
Feb 8 - 06:04 PM
Lee Augustus
*I
Feb 8 - 06:05 PM
Infernal Dude
Kind of liked how you said it the first time. Reminds me of my Russian buddies.
Feb 8 - 08:19 PM
Michal Karolczak
they should!!! thrawn trilogy is almost a ready script
Feb 9 - 10:11 AM
Chris Middleton
I couldn't agree more. Those books came out back when official Star Wars novels were still something special (you know, back before most of them became laughable) and Timothy Zhan delivered perhaps the best work of his career and the most worthy follow up to the classic trilogy to date (yes including Lucas' own prequel films). He captured the essence of our most beloved characters and introduced a new multi-faceted villain (Thrawn) and in the process blurred the lines between good and evil. The books featured the political intrigue of Lucas' prequel trilogy with the action and tension of the original trilogy and then one-upped both of them with creative climaxes that only heightened in drama with each successive book. He also took the idea of Jedi Masters to grander levels than what was ultimately unveiled by Lucas (Lets just say they weren't merely better sword fighters than Jedi Knights lol.) That trilogy remains to this day the benchmark for all Star Wars literature and has perhaps never been matched even by Zahn himself.
My main concern is that those books picked up more or less where the Return of the Jedi left off, meaning that one of two things would have to happen: 1) Altering the timeline to match the age of the original actors; or 2) all the classic characters would have to be recast. Neither is ideal and would be a cause of great apprehension at least for myself. I could see someone like Matt Damon making a good Luke Skywalker, but how can one possibly fill the shoes left by Harrison Ford?
Still, despite my concerns about adapting the Thrawn trilogy, I highly doubt that Disney will be able to pen a superior script. Besides, from the sounds of it, they seem to be treading into the exact same murky casting waters.
Feb 10 - 01:11 PM
Dyego Alehandro
Another agreement! Thrawn is far and away my favorite Star Wars character and, let's be honest here, Timothy Zahn's excellent books brought Star Wars back from the brink. People tend to forget that by the late 80's and very early 1990, Star Wars was kind of dead and forgotten. The Thrawn Trilogy brought it back to life, and for awhile there that was a very good thing. Then things went downhill from there.
It is, however, a very grand pity about your concerns because they are very valid. It would be painful to recast Han Solo because, let's face it, nobody can do Harrison Ford justice. Pushing the timeline into the future -could- work but, of course, would tick off a large number of fans of the extended universe (who have already been ticked off by Lucas anyway, so there's no pleasing them [read: me]). I don't know.
All I know for sure is that they need to hire Zahn as a story consultant immediately. Also, you really should read some of his other work. Icarus Hunt and the Dragonback series are excellent sci-fi novels and rank among my favorite all-time books, even though the Dragonbacks are considered "young adult."
Feb 12 - 01:38 AM