Average Rating: 6.5/10
Reviews Counted: 218
Fresh: 145 | Rotten: 73
Containing more of what made the Star Wars series fun, Attack of the Clones is an improvement over The Phantom Menace.
Average Rating: 5.5/10
Critic Reviews: 40
Fresh: 16 | Rotten: 24
Containing more of what made the Star Wars series fun, Attack of the Clones is an improvement over The Phantom Menace.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.3/5
User Ratings: 708,690
The second prequel to the original Star Wars trilogy takes place ten years after the events depicted in Star Wars: Episode I -- The Phantom Menace. Now 20, young Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) is an apprentice to respected Jedi knight Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor). Unusually powerful in the Force, Anakin is also impatient, arrogant, and headstrong -- causing his mentor a great deal of concern. The pair are ordered to protect Padme Amidala (Natalie Portman), the former queen of the planet
May 16, 2002 Wide
Nov 12, 2002
$310.3M
20th Century Fox
All Critics (219) | Top Critics (40) | Fresh (151) | Rotten (73) | DVD (49)
This time the exposition is so thick that everyone except acolytes may tune out.
Lucas has never been able to conjure another Han Solo, a character who could, with simply a wink, remind us that this was just an overgrown Saturday afternoon serial.
A commendable example of the sort of movie we once loved and then outgrew.
The scale of the enterprise is thrilling; it's too bad the movie is so muddled on so many different levels.
The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones have reduced the franchise to, well, a franchise.
Hold on to your No-Doz: Another Star Wars is here.
Great action, intense mood, but romance may bore kids.
Sit back and enjoy fantastic, imaginative visuals.
It starts off briskly with some fantastic special effects and a great high-speed chase but then founders on the shores of bad script writing.
All in all, a far more superior film than its predecessor.
Lucas does not always recognize his limitations. This tends to make films of mixed quality. Still, there is always enough that is excellent to make them worth seeing.
Attack of the Clones emerges looking as bad as if not worse than its 1999 predecessor, thanks to the lame romantic subplot, which is so badly written, directed and performed that it surpasses Jar-Jar Binks as the all-time low point in the series.
Makes The Phantom Menace seem like one long clearing of the throat before Lucas could begin to tell the real story.
The special effects are remarkable, yet somehow numbing, and the film only partly lives up to the promise in the title of Lucas's company, Industrial Light and Magic.
While it lacks the quality of Empire's script and performances, Clones is the most visually enthralling of the series so far.
It is certainly better than the childish Phantom Menace and the final 45 minutes of straight action beat the editing nightmare at the end of the last film.
Christensen is a winning mix of sultry and sulky as the now older Anakin, while McGregor is finally beginning to relax as the mentor who understandably refuses to treat his moody pupil like a grown-up.
The magic has definitely been recaptured.
As convincing a job as they, Christensen, and Lee do, they all end up being upstaged by the jaw-dropping skills of a CGI creation: Yoda (again voiced by Frank Oz), who finally gets a chance to show exactly why he has such a legendary reputation.
The muppet steals what's otherwise an underwhelming show.
Clones is far from perfect, but when it clicks, it revives the old spirit that made a generation become so obsessed with all things Star Wars in the first place.
It's impossible...to dismiss a film with this much stuff: exotic production design, imaginative characters, and a wide variety of digital jedi fu.
It would be easy to say that this film is fantastic and blows away the others, but unfortunately I cannot.
Superior to Episode I -- The Phantom Menace, with its annoying Jar Jar Binks and its dull, galaxy-hopping story line.
Hayden Christensen. I'm sick of the guy.As for the action, definitely one of the best in the entire saga but the acting is seriously lacking. The worst, plot-wise, than any other Star Wars movie.
December 6, 2011Super Reviewer
Nowhere near as good as the original trilogy that changed blockbuster cinema forever but a definete improvement to the Phantom Menace.
November 1, 2011
Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Twilight: Breaking Dawn Part 1
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures
Unconventional Superheroes