Stigmata (1999)

TOMATOMETER

AUDIENCE SCORE

Critic Consensus: The story is unconvincing and the acting is weak.


Movie Info

Stigmata is a supernatural suspense story about good, evil, and faith. Frankie Paige (Patricia Arquette) is a hair stylist in her mid-20s who has no strong religious convictions until odd things start happening to her after she's given a rosary by her mother: she begins speaking with another person's voice; unknown and unseen forces start to attack her; and she develops stigmata, bleeding wounds that spontaneously appear on her wrists, feet, and side, as Christ was wounded at Calvary. Some … More

Rating: R (for intense violent sequences, language and some sexuality)
Genre: Drama, Horror
Directed By:
Written By: Tom Lazarus, Rick Ramage
In Theaters:
On DVD: Feb 29, 2000
Runtime:

Cast


as Frankie Paige

as Father Andrew Kierna...

as Cardinal Daniel Hous...

as Donna Chadway

as Jennifer Kelliho

as Father Durning

as Marion Petrocelli

as Father Dario

as Father Gianni Delmon...

as Dr. Reston

as Doctor

as ER Nurse

as Attending Nurse

as Dr. Eckworth

as Valet Priest

as Woman with a Baby

as Sister Angela

as Sister Agnes

as Donna's Customer

as MTA Man

as Homeless Woman

as Father Paulo Alameid...

as Waitress

as Guard

as Aerialist

as Flower Boy

as Jennifer's Costumer

as Italian Businessman

as Italian Businessman
Show More Cast

News & Interviews for Stigmata

Friend Ratings

No Friends? Inconceivable! Log in to see what your friends have to say.

Login

Critic Reviews for Stigmata

All Critics (108) | Top Critics (30)

Tom Lazarus and Rick Ramage should be ashamed to have written such nonsense!

Full Review… | January 1, 2000
Chicago Tribune
Top Critic

A garish clashing of sacred images and bloody semihorror, this is a movie that defines the category: interesting failure.

January 1, 2000
Miami Herald
Top Critic

Appear to have been inspired by old Iron Maiden videos!

January 1, 2000
Detroit Free Press
Top Critic

Even after watching Stigmata, I'll be damned, so to speak, if I can explain it!

January 1, 2000
Orlando Sentinel
Top Critic

What Stigmata suffers from is a bad case of late-1990s moviemaking. That is, it prefers sensationalism to making sense.

Full Review… | January 1, 2000
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Top Critic

Is there an eighth deadly sin called 'narcissistic direction'?

Full Review… | January 1, 2000
Washington Post
Top Critic

Audience Reviews for Stigmata

½

Interesting concept for a horror film, Stigmata is quite underrated. Although definitely not perfect, the film manages to be good enough entertainment. The big problem with Stigmata is that it relies too much on its special effects to create its horror. Stigmata plays out like a special effects feast. I think it's a shame because the film had so much potential in being a strong horror film. This is a decent film at best with an interesting story; however director Rupert Wainwright is very strong on visuals and peppers the film with far too many effects. If the film would have used fewer effects, then maybe this would have been a much more memorable horror flick. Stigmata isn't a bad flick by any means, but there's definitely room for improvement. The high points of the film is it's a very atmospheric film, and if director Rupert Wainwright would have toned down the effects, and focused more on the dark, brooding atmosphere, then Stigmata would have been a much better film. I enjoyed the film, and I don't believe the film is as bad as what everyone has said it would be. This could have been a great film, and a hint of its brilliance is apparent, but is over done with too many effects. On the other hand, the plot is interesting and really original. If the special effects would have been toned down, and director Rupert Wainwright would have focused more on the tone and atmosphere of the film, I think Stigmata would have been a much better film. Overall this isn't a bad film, but it's not a good either. It's a decent popcorn horror flick from a director who clearly goes for visuals rather than substance.

TheDudeLebowski65
Alex roy

Super Reviewer

Stigmata is mediocre at best. The overall pace and style are a bit on the dull side, as is the repeated voice-overs layered on to scenes from previous scenes. The score and soundtrack aren't all that great either, even with the partcipation of Billy Corgan. The whole piece just feels tired and unenergetic. The only time it gets interesting is during the possession scenes, and eveything surround them and leading up to them is dull. It isn't boring, per se, just lacking the confidence and energy needed to drive it. The biblical aspects are interesting, and it's also nice to see people like Gabriel Byrne and Jonathan Pryce, but it needed more. Perhaps Rupert Wainwright wasn't the right director for the material. Patricia Arquette was, however, the right actress for the lead role. She's always had a haunted quality about her that filters through in her roles whether she means it to or not, but it works here. The entire film can't be saved by those things alone though, and it winds up lacking the parts to make it a whole.

FilmFanatik
Tim Salmons

Super Reviewer

½

Patricia Arquette plays Frankie Paige, a woman who is a self-proclaimed athiest. One day, after receiving a package from her mother in Brazil, she starts to get the marks of the Stigmata. When a person gets the marks, they receive the same wounds that Jesus did on the cross, namely the 5 wounds of the hands, the feet, the head, the back and the side. But only the most religious people usually receive the marks, and Frankie is far from religious. Her marks are unexplainable. The Vatican has a department that goes out to explore and investigate people who report seeing signs from God. Father Andrew (Gabriel Byrne) is assigned to meet with Frankie. He too can not explain the Stigmata but knows that unless he can figure out why this is happening to her, she will die.

Stigmata had the look of a futuristic sci-fi film. It was always raining, strange lighting, and lots of quick cuts. There were a lot of double exposure shots, voices and hallucinations and people screaming. It was too much. Frankie gets this haunted rosary and immediately stats getting the marks of the Stigmata. That's fine. But then the movie gets bogged down. There are too many starts and stops. Things start to happen, Frankie gets possessed by a strange spirit, and then out of nowhere it stops. This happens way too much. You start to feel like they're finally getting to the point, and then... nothing. It was only within the last 15 minutes that things started to pick up. Once the reasoning is explained and we see the true nature of the Vatican, things get interesting, leading to an explosive ending. But before that I kept thinking, just get to the damn point.

With a movie like The Sixth Sense, I felt somewhat the same way. But with that surprise ending, I understood why it was made the way it was. With Stigmata, there was no need to keep building up suspense only to let you down. Things could have been explained as the movie went along, rather than waiting to the end to throw everything at you. And how that rosary ended up playing a part in the Stigmata happening to Frankie was never really talked about. I wish that they had cut down on the quick edits and actually told a story. I wish that they had decided that this story was able to carry the movie, and not felt the need to throw in a lot of effects that took away from the film. I think the story was a good one, especially, once again, when everything was finally explained. But in this day and age it seems that MTV-style editing and special effects carry the day.

Overall I found Stigmata to be a tease. It would bring you to the edge and then all of a sudden stop. It was only the last 15 minutes or so that made it worthwhile at all.

YodaMasterJedi
MisterYoda ?

Super Reviewer

Stigmata Quotes

– Submitted by Ram C (2 years ago)

Discussion Forum

Discuss Stigmata on our Movie forum!