What's the difference between writing and directing? Do you think you can get more of what's in your head on the screen when you're directing?
CK: I wanted to try. I think directing and writing are very different jobs, and that is very apparent to me now. It probably was before, but now I understand more so why they're different. Obviously, directing is a more social and managerial job. The other thing about directing is that it's a very, very pragmatic job, and writing isn't. You spend most of your time as a director trying to move forward with the movie. It happens on a daily basis, if not more than once a day, that you are struggling with budgetary constraints. Whereas when you're writing, the limitation that you have is your imagination. So it's decidedly non-pragmatic.
Charlie Kaufman (second from left) on the set of Synecdoche, New York.
Synecdoche, New York seems a lot darker than the other stuff you've done. That's not to say your other films were necessarily light-hearted...
CK: Depending on the audience, it seems to get a lot of laughs. But yeah, I think I know what you're saying. One of the things is that I'm moving -- as a person and as a writer -- through time. I'm a different age now. I'm thinking about different things. I have different life experiences. I'm trying to get closer to being honest. And by closer I mean that at different ages I have different ideas of what the truth is, and at any point I'm trying to express that at that moment in time. I think one of the things I wanted to do in this movie was not have an out for people. If there are any expectations for things that I write, I think there's an expectation that there's going to be some sort of thing that the audience gets at some point that is like a clever thing that is kind of an out, like, "Oh yeah! I get it now. OK, I can go home now. That's clever," if they like it. I decided not to do that this time. I wanted to tell the story, and I wanted it -- within the realm of realm of the dream logic and the surreal stuff in the movie -- I wanted it to be true. And the truth of it was, this man goes through his life, and there isn't a moment where you go, "Oh! That's what this is about. Now I feel safe." This would be a like a free fall until the end of his life, and that's what I did.
What are you working on now?
CK: I'm trying to write something new, but it's very early on. I don't know what it's gonna be yet.
When I was watching the film, it kind of reminded me of Luis Bunuel's That Obscure Object of Desire, in that there was a certain fluidity to some of the characters; some would seem to act as proxies for others.
CK: I'm not sure that I've ever seen that movie. I'm getting these things that I've never seen. A lot of people say [the film reminds them of] 8 1/2, which I've never seen. I've heard All That Jazz [as well]. And in fact, if I see another movie, and I see that I'm thinking along the lines of something else, I won't do it. For example, I really like David Lynch. He deals with dream reality a lot. But my dreams and David Lynch's dreams are not the same. I didn't want to incorporate his dreams. As much as I love them, they're his. I'm trying to find my own. I want to do my own thing, and I'm trying to get closer to realizing that as a filmmaker.
Related Items
| Celeb: | Charlie Kaufman |
|
stevegilpin writes: on Oct 22 2008 01:49 PM Wow! I love this guy! Can't wait to see this movie. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Oct 22 2008 01:53 PM Probably the best interview I've read RT do with someone. Kaufman gave great succinct responses. I'm actually not a huge fan of his, although most of my friends love him. "Eternal" was a little too good for my taste, the whole time I watched it I thought of a girl I broke up with that I hadn't. My mind during the whole movie was distracted by itself. Adaptation was a little too over the top for me, although the use of the orchid (right flower?) was great. I can't wait to see his pure vision come out as a director. I wish him well. I can understand the Lynch comparisons, but I don't really agree with them. Lynch isn't as linear, and much of what he does is incomprehensible without knowing other works. Lynch is also a hell of a lot more violent and upsetting, while Kaufman has great absurdist humor. Kaufman reminds me more of Beckett and Ionesco (sp?) then other American directors. Actually, if I had to choose a style of American visionary, I'd say Kaufman reminds me more of Gilliam. Again, great interview. (Reply to this) |
|
wordweaver12 writes: on Oct 22 2008 02:25 PM Catherine Keener, please get an oscar for this role. It's long overdue! (Reply to this) |
|
HiramMaxem writes: on Oct 22 2008 02:42 PM I really like the work of this guy, he's completely outside of the Hollywood-type of movies, yet he's able to work with and in Hollywood at the same time, much respect! He achieves not only hugely entertaining stories, but is able to provoke deep thoughts about the human/creative/condition as well, not an easy feat, and not one that is being pursuit as much anymore, not even by the American master Directors (Coppola, Scorsese, Spielberg, Malick) Creative voices like Kaufman%u2019s are rare and much appreciated. Great interview RT, thanks (Reply to this) |
|
digitalrelic writes: on Oct 22 2008 03:02 PM tomwaitsjr, all Kaufman said is that he really likes David Lynch. He understands that Lynch's dreams(stories/imagery) is different than his own. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Oct 22 2008 03:13 PM In reply to this comment (#2089715) Digital Relic, I know what he said. I was commenting that other people compare him with Lynch. (Reply to this) |
|
Tim Ryan writes: on Oct 22 2008 03:14 PM In reply to this comment (#2089666) Thanks! (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Oct 22 2008 03:28 PM Kaufman is a great writer, I expect this to be great. (Reply to this) |
|
vitajex writes: on Oct 22 2008 03:42 PM Charlie Kaufman is, without a doubt, THE absolute best "named" writer in Hollywood. No one else even comes close to delivering works that are as entertaining, original, inventive and incredibly thought-provoking. While so many are focused on gloss and hype, he is focused on creating works of art that transcend the medium of film. I think it's helped that his films have attracted attention from Michel Gondry (one of the most creative directors working today. Just watch his music videos- MINDBLOWING) and Spike Jonze (a very respectable director). It will be interesting to see if he is able to direct a film, but I have no doubt he can write a winner. And our grandchildren will hear his name mentioned in film history classes as often as we hear Orson Welles' name... (Reply to this) |
|
cjjojay writes: on Oct 22 2008 03:43 PM I saw the film at the Austin Film Festival. The whole time I thought of how Lynch-ian it was. Much funnier than something from Lynch, but definitly in the same vein. This is by far the most dream like of his movies: it flows from conscious to sub-conscious without a hitch. I got to ask him a question, but it didn't come out of my mouth the same way it was in my mind. He kinda looked at me odd. Oh well, he ended up answering the question anyway. I got him to sign a movie ticket. If I had known I would be able to get his autograph I would have packed up DVD's with me. I got another odd look. I think I should consider myself lucky. Two odd looks from a screenwriting master! By the way, the film is very good. I haven't stoped thinking about it. It deffinitly will spark conversation. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Oct 22 2008 04:13 PM By Austin Film Festival is that South by Southwest? (Reply to this) |
|
cjjojay writes: on Oct 22 2008 04:28 PM No. South by Southwest is in the spring. Austin Film Fest is set up by the Austin Film Society. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Oct 22 2008 04:55 PM cjjojay, Thanks for the clarification. I thought SXSW music festival is March, and thought film festival same time. I haven't seen an advanced screening since I saw 8 mile, wheras eminem actually showed up, in East Lansing. (Reply to this) |
|
Alexcar writes: on Oct 22 2008 04:58 PM He's pretty much the smartest guy in the world. Great answers. (Reply to this) |
|
Floor Man writes: on Oct 22 2008 05:18 PM Charlie Kaufman is a creatively innovative and articulate genius. I can't wait to see this; even if it's not the best reviewed film he's made/written, his inventive creations are always a pleasure to experience. Excellent interview! 'Nuff said. :) (Reply to this) |
|
knowingtoast85 writes: on Oct 22 2008 05:19 PM In reply to this comment (#2089806) Any hack can come up with a weird, wacky idea you've never seen before in a movie. (A Robot Bear discovers he's not real and learns to drive a car so he can run over his creators. There's one off the top of my head.) Kaufman is among the unique voices who grounds every quirk and oddball turn of story in identifiable characters and interesting themes. Thus, he gets the acclaim. Fear not, hacks. Your robot bear ideas will make awesome internet shorts. (Reply to this) |
|
tomwaitsjr writes: on Oct 22 2008 05:42 PM Actually, the new red alert game will have armored bears that shoot weapons. . . So your idea of Robot Bear may be stolen and show up in a film/video game. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg1138 writes: on Oct 22 2008 05:57 PM I've heard of all of theese. Haven't seen a single one. Damn me. (Reply to this) |
|
finlayson_ma writes: on Oct 22 2008 06:51 PM I appreciate his honesty, but he should really watch 8 1/2 before he proceeds to his next directing project. The movies that he's written are hardly similar to those that David Lynch has directed. I am looking forward to Synecdoche. (Reply to this) |
|
BowieSwimmer writes: on Oct 22 2008 08:03 PM I simply CANNOT wait for Synecdoche. It promises to be astounding... And Kaufman really is a modern movie genius. I just wish his movies were more appreciated by the general public, and not simply by movie fanatics. Quirky, bizarre, oddball... and at the same time in no way pretentious or heavy-handed. Wonderful. His work will be remembered for ages. Eternal Sunshine is my favorite movie of all time. Not only is it a beautifully surreal look at the concept at love, but it presents one of the most realistic on-screen relationships ever. If you've never seen a Kaufman, check out all of his stuff. As soon as possible. This interview is perfect. Damn, I just can't get enough of this guy. Wonderful. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |












