Was Liam Neeson looking for a script with lousier dialogue than "The Phantom Menace"?
Liam Neeson shows off his Jack Bauer impression in "Taken," a violent revenge thriller that suffers bad timing.
"Taken" leaps onto the "torture chic" bandwagon driven mostly by "24" (though "Lost" deserves some of the blame) for the last few years. But "Taken" may have leaped at the wrong moment in history, arriving in theaters a week after President Obama banned torture. Even "24" anticipated the new administration and has hedged its position this season, with new characters constantly chiding Jack that torture is wrong - not that it's stopped him yet.
Films, which take at least two years to go from screenplay to theatrical release, cannot adjust to the public's changing moods as rapidly as television. With its hardcore approach to violence and torture, "Taken" seems so 2007.
To say Neeson's character, retired CIA operative Bryan Mills, often resorts to torture would be inaccurate. "Resort" implies he considers other options first. For Bryan, torture becomes his primary mode of social interaction. He's the kind of guy who always keeps a set of jumper cables handy, and not to start a car. Despite this, "Taken" has received a lenient PG-13 rating.
Unlike Jack Bauer, Bryan doesn't maim enemies on the government's dime. He's acting as a private citizen, trying to find the white slavers who kidnapped his teenage daughter, Kim (Maggie Grace, formerly of "Lost"), while she was vacationing in Paris. When a French official warns Bryan, "You can't just go around tearing down Paris," he responds, "I'll tear down the Eiffel Tower if I have to."
By the time Neeson delivers this sub-Steven Seagal line, you already will have asked yourself 287 times why such a respected, Oscar-nominated actor would star in this piece of junk. Was he looking for a script with lousier dialogue than "The Phantom Menace"?
Like most contemporary action movies that don't star Matt Damon, "Taken" jumps from scene to scene with no regard for logic. When Bryan tries to nab a kidnapper at Paris' Orly airport, he kills one suspect, injures another and causes a major traffic jam in front of dozens of witnesses. Yet no police officer arrives to arrest him. As mindless as the action is, at least the filmmakers stage a better car chase through a stone quarry than the one in "Quantum of Solace."
Even though "Taken" is only 93 minutes long, the script contains flab. The opening wastes time with a pointless subplot where Bryan saves a pop diva (named Sheerah) from an attacker. Nothing establishes an ex-CIA operative's tough-guy credibility like a scene stolen from "The Bodyguard."
The script may be simple-minded and its tolerance for torture may be immoral, but the most offense aspect of "Taken" is its jingoism. The whole story is based on the fear of anything foreign. At the outset Bryan objects to his teenage daughter visiting Paris, even though, statistically speaking, she should be safer there than in her hometown of Los Angeles. But Bryan's suspicions of anything not American are proved correct when Kim becomes a target of white slavers minutes after she lands at Orly.
"Taken" is racist as well. Once in Paris, Bryan threatens, tortures and murders a series of dark-skinned men until, finally, he must race the clock to save his daughter before she is deflowered by a glutinous Arab sheik. The screenwriters throw a token rich American into the villainous mix, but essentially "Taken" is about saving American maidenhood from the lascivious foreign hoard - a paranoid theme that filled dime novels a century ago. The only thing missing is the phrase "yellow peril," but maybe they're holding that for the sequel.
Even though the film depicts Paris as a home to all miscreants opposed to American virtues, "Taken" essentially is a French import. Producer and co-writer Luc Besson ("La Femme Nikita," "The Professional") and director Pierre Morel either hold their country's law enforcement in low regard, or - more likely - they cynically expect American audiences to lap up this toxic mix of torture and jingoism. Why would they do this to us after we gave them "Ratatouille"?
"Taken" leaps onto the "torture chic" bandwagon driven mostly by "24" (though "Lost" deserves some of the blame) for the last few years. But "Taken" may have leaped at the wrong moment in history, arriving in theaters a week after President Obama banned torture. Even "24" anticipated the new administration and has hedged its position this season, with new characters constantly chiding Jack that torture is wrong - not that it's stopped him yet.
Films, which take at least two years to go from screenplay to theatrical release, cannot adjust to the public's changing moods as rapidly as television. With its hardcore approach to violence and torture, "Taken" seems so 2007.
To say Neeson's character, retired CIA operative Bryan Mills, often resorts to torture would be inaccurate. "Resort" implies he considers other options first. For Bryan, torture becomes his primary mode of social interaction. He's the kind of guy who always keeps a set of jumper cables handy, and not to start a car. Despite this, "Taken" has received a lenient PG-13 rating.
Unlike Jack Bauer, Bryan doesn't maim enemies on the government's dime. He's acting as a private citizen, trying to find the white slavers who kidnapped his teenage daughter, Kim (Maggie Grace, formerly of "Lost"), while she was vacationing in Paris. When a French official warns Bryan, "You can't just go around tearing down Paris," he responds, "I'll tear down the Eiffel Tower if I have to."
By the time Neeson delivers this sub-Steven Seagal line, you already will have asked yourself 287 times why such a respected, Oscar-nominated actor would star in this piece of junk. Was he looking for a script with lousier dialogue than "The Phantom Menace"?
Like most contemporary action movies that don't star Matt Damon, "Taken" jumps from scene to scene with no regard for logic. When Bryan tries to nab a kidnapper at Paris' Orly airport, he kills one suspect, injures another and causes a major traffic jam in front of dozens of witnesses. Yet no police officer arrives to arrest him. As mindless as the action is, at least the filmmakers stage a better car chase through a stone quarry than the one in "Quantum of Solace."
Even though "Taken" is only 93 minutes long, the script contains flab. The opening wastes time with a pointless subplot where Bryan saves a pop diva (named Sheerah) from an attacker. Nothing establishes an ex-CIA operative's tough-guy credibility like a scene stolen from "The Bodyguard."
The script may be simple-minded and its tolerance for torture may be immoral, but the most offense aspect of "Taken" is its jingoism. The whole story is based on the fear of anything foreign. At the outset Bryan objects to his teenage daughter visiting Paris, even though, statistically speaking, she should be safer there than in her hometown of Los Angeles. But Bryan's suspicions of anything not American are proved correct when Kim becomes a target of white slavers minutes after she lands at Orly.
"Taken" is racist as well. Once in Paris, Bryan threatens, tortures and murders a series of dark-skinned men until, finally, he must race the clock to save his daughter before she is deflowered by a glutinous Arab sheik. The screenwriters throw a token rich American into the villainous mix, but essentially "Taken" is about saving American maidenhood from the lascivious foreign hoard - a paranoid theme that filled dime novels a century ago. The only thing missing is the phrase "yellow peril," but maybe they're holding that for the sequel.
Even though the film depicts Paris as a home to all miscreants opposed to American virtues, "Taken" essentially is a French import. Producer and co-writer Luc Besson ("La Femme Nikita," "The Professional") and director Pierre Morel either hold their country's law enforcement in low regard, or - more likely - they cynically expect American audiences to lap up this toxic mix of torture and jingoism. Why would they do this to us after we gave them "Ratatouille"?
|
Water W. writes: on Feb 24 2009 07:31 AM Action not dialogue makes this a good film. Body language, facial expressions and demeanor are the appropriate conveyances of emotion in this, not words. Very solid performance. (Reply to this) |
|
Stephen G. writes: on Feb 25 2009 07:45 AM Excellent review of a totally worthless movie. Liam Neeson must be behind on his mortgage payments. (Reply to this) |
|
Tom P. writes: on Jun 11 2009 07:03 AM This is historic; someone apparently thinks that it isn't commonplace for parents (especially ones who have the means to do so) to make outlandish remarks concerning the extent of their efforts to help or save their children. It's by no means a sub-Steven Seagal line; I would matter of factly say that the lines in this are fairly well written. Your other point about the action being non sensical is thin and poorly purpotrated in your critique because of your blind review that refuses objectivity. He is a CIA agent who got into the country without going through customs (He flew over on a private jet liner) and directly after he makes his fist big bang he has the head of Paris Police letting him know he is watching. Your review is quite sickening, easily one of the best movies of 2009 - perhaps if all the movies you rated were 'The Notebook' they'd all recieve fair reviews. (Reply to this) |
|
Tom P. writes: on Jun 11 2009 07:15 AM So I guess you think the movie 'White men can't jump?' starring Woody Harrelson was racist too; how about all the James Bond movies? I suppose being a raving, sorely educated lunatic, you missed out on the Cold War and the fact that Russian spies abroad, KGB, were incredibly feared - Bond was a token gesture to Brittish and American audiences who watched a clever, handsome english speaking agent run circles around idiotic Russian fools. Likewise, in an era where the middle east is our common enemy, it is no surprise that a movie was designed to be fill us with joy as yet another handsome whitey beats the bloody heck out of those rotten foreigners! I suppose it is a surprise to you however, as in your little better than Ebert's spahgetti and wine review, you run circles around yourself. Well done Fido, and cheers! (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |


