This week at the movies, we've got a kidnapping plot (Taken, starring Liam Neeson and Famke Janssen); haunted teens (The Uninvited, starring Emily Browning and Elizabeth Banks); and cold comfort (New in Town, starring Renee Zellweger and Harry Connick Jr.). What do the critics have to say?
Taken
Taken is an action flick that's both efficient and absurd, critics say, and so it's often entertaining -- but only up to a point. The film stars Liam Neeson as a retired CIA agent who learns his daughter has been abducted in Paris; upon receiving a frantic phone call from her, he tracks her down -- and finds himself on the trail of a massive criminal enterprise. The pundits say Taken is a sprightly piece of work, and Neeson is compelling in the lead role, but the film is weighted down by contrivances and leaps in logic.
The Uninvited
Another Asian horror remake getting released in January? While the critics say The Uninvited may not live up to the standard set by its source material (2003's A Tale of Two Sisters), it's a reasonably involving thriller-- though not an entirely successful one. Emily Browning plays a young woman with a history of mental problems who, upon meeting her father's new fiancée (Elizabeth Banks), is immediately suspicious; creepy goings-on ensue. The pundits say The Uninvited is moody and well acted, but it also contains plenty of haunted house conventions and telegraphed plot twists.
New in Town
It may be cold in Minnesota this time of year, but that's nothing compared to the chilly reception the critics have given New in Town. In this fish-out-of-water romantic comedy, Renee Zellweger stars as a hotshot executive who's sent to the Land of 10,000 Lakes to oversee layoffs at one of her company's factories; there, she falls for the local union rep (Harry Connick Jr.) and learns about the strange customs of small-town Americans. The pundits say New in Town's timely premise and winning leads are no match for the film's weather-beaten, clichéd script, which tries way too hard to be uplifting.
Also opening this week in limited release:
- Medicine for Melancholy, a stylish, nuanced tale of two Bay Area hipsters in love, is at 94 percent.
- The Filipino import Serbis, a documentary that examines at the root causes of the long-running gang war, is at 90 percent.
- Shadows, about a young man who survives a car crash only to be confronted by ghostly visions, is at 57 percent.
- Blessed Is the Match: The Life and Death of Hannah Senesh, a documentary about the famed poet and resistance fighter who attempted to free imprisoned Jews in World War II, is at 50 percent.
- The Toe Tactic, a live action/animated hybrid about a young woman dealing with the death of her father, is at 43 percent.
Finally, props to AnthonyDidge, who came the closest to guessing Underworld: Rise of the Lycans' 34 percent Tomatometer.
Related Items
| Movie: | The Uninvited |
| New in Town | |
| Medicine for Melancholy | |
| Serbis | |
| Blessed Is the Match: The Life and Death of Hannah Senesh | |
| Shadows | |
| The Toe Tactic |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Jan 29 2009 05:09 PM I think I am going to see Taken tomorrow. I am sure it will be illogical, but it looks like it will be bad @ss and I like Liam Neeson. I am also going to try to see Waltz With Bashir. I am looking forward to Coraline next week, and I am actually starting to find my self interested in seeing Friday the 13th. (Reply to this) |
|
the_don_of_yreka writes: on Jan 29 2009 06:34 PM It sucks that a good film like Medicine for Melancholy, is not in wide release. Anyways, nothing really good for this week. Can March get here sooner? (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg1138 writes: on Jan 29 2009 06:48 PM My computer didn't work most of today, I get bavk on and get a pleasent remiander about "New in Town". "Taken" looks like an all time low for Neeson, but it looks like "Citizen Kane" in comparrison to "New in Town". One of the worst months for movies ends with the worst of em all. And now we have to contend with Febuary. Eeeshh. I really don't like Renee Zellweger as an actress, she kind of annoys me. But she's attractive. Attractive and annoying. She's like Sarah Palin. (Reply to this) |
|
Goatmeal writes: on Jan 29 2009 07:46 PM In reply to this comment (#2289894) Good looking on supporting Fox (Taken). (Reply to this) |
|
Ace69 writes: on Jan 29 2009 09:08 PM Taken has been on the internet for a while i saw it. But im still going to see it just to see it on the big screen (Reply to this) |
|
Xx MooSE xX writes: on Jan 29 2009 09:20 PM What action film wouldn't take a leap in logic? Taken will be good, good enough to kill Paul Blart! Hopefully (Reply to this) |
|
jokerboy1991 writes: on Jan 29 2009 09:36 PM In reply to this comment (#2290143) Ah *****, Taken is a FOX movie?!? Maybe I'll give it a pass because I like Liam Neeson, or maybe I'll buy a ticket for something else and see it. (Reply to this) |
|
ZiGyStRdUsT writes: on Jan 29 2009 10:11 PM PIRCAY IS THE ANSWER HERE (Reply to this) |
|
Solonik -. writes: on Jan 29 2009 10:33 PM Saw Taken, not bad if you can forgive the ludicrous plot since the action is pretty intense. (Reply to this) |
|
Brittany M. writes: on Jan 29 2009 11:09 PM I can't believe The Uninvited is tracking so high. I saw a screening of it about a year ago, and it was by far the worst movie I've ever seen. They might have recut it to improve it, but I rather doubt it. (Reply to this) |
|
Gilles F. writes: on Jan 29 2009 11:43 PM Taken is really, really lame. I saw it last year in France, I'm french and even if it is made by a frenchman and shooted in Paris, this movie is ****. It is a complete nonsense, and the actions scenes are stupid, and not that original at all. And if like me you are a fan of Liam Neeson, help him : don't go and watch this movie. (Reply to this) |
|
Gilles F. writes: on Jan 29 2009 11:54 PM Taken is really, really lame. I saw it last year in France, I'm french and even if it is made by a frenchman and shooted in Paris, this movie is ****. It is a complete nonsense, and the actions scenes are stupid, and not that original at all. And if like me you are a fan of Liam Neeson, help him : don't go and watch this movie. (Reply to this) |
|
HyperionChild writes: on Jan 30 2009 02:45 AM Taken is just distributed by FOX in the US. It was produced by CANAL (Reply to this) |
|
Funkmaster Flex writes: on Jan 30 2009 06:20 AM Emily Browning? I haven't heard her name since A Series of Unfortunate Events. I'll think I'll just see Underworld since I didn't last week. Or maybe I'll just play COD instead. I would only want to see Taken if the criminal mastermind were Darth Maul and Liam had to fight him again. (Reply to this) |
|
MizzleBrizzle writes: on Jan 30 2009 06:21 AM I think I'll go see Frost/Nixon today. XP I doubt I would have been interested in Taken even if it was 95%. I'm tired of movies about how terrible it is when white women get abducted. I like Zellweger, but I wish she would do something that wasn't sheer pabulum so I could go see it. (Reply to this) |
|
Funkmaster Flex writes: on Jan 30 2009 06:37 AM MB, it's only when ATTRACTIVE white women are abducted. Liam wouldn't give a crap if it was Rosie O'Donnell. (Reply to this) |
|
Elixor writes: on Jan 30 2009 06:45 AM I'm going to go see this to go see Liam's performance. I'm tempted to go along with Jokerboy and buy a ticket to something else, but if it's a good movie, I'd want to reward the other people involved outside of FOX. (Reply to this) |
|
Hans M. writes: on Jan 30 2009 08:54 AM First off, as a copy editor at another website-- WTF?! Did you see the typos in the Taken blurb and the lifeless writing since the fun captions went away from here? RT, contact me, if you're looking for some help. On to this week's movies, nothing I'm too excited about, but I could have told you Uninvited and especially New in Town were going to be weak. Hollywood needs to stop bastardizing J-Horror, and those slapstick commercials for New in Town never boded well for any seeking substance in that movie. As for Taken, there's something seductive about the testosterone that fuels the plot that piques my interest. (Reply to this) |
|
Solonik -. writes: on Jan 30 2009 11:22 AM In reply to this comment (#2290748) Who would?? (Reply to this) |
|
knowingtoast85 writes: on Jan 30 2009 01:20 PM I want to mail my $8 directly to Pierre Morel, because he deserves it - the internet-leaked version of Taken completely rocked my socks. Too bad Fox cut a lot of the violence to get to a PG-13, thereby neutering all of the fun antihero subtext in it. I want to show my friends how wild, scuzzy and awesome this movie is on the big screen, and thanks to Fox, I can't. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |













