Terminator 3 - Rise of the Machines Reviews

Page 3 of 708
August 30, 2006
entertaining.. kind of. A disappointment after T2.
½ March 12, 2007
Considering this was just about the most expensive movie of all time and felt like it was straight-to-video, I have to consider it a failure of legendary proportions. What a joke of a Terminator movie this is. Makes me super angry.
November 4, 2012
Not a patch on its predecessor yet still a solid actioner. Good, entertaining fun.
½ July 23, 2015
Schade, das dieser Film sich nicht terminieren lässt.
½ June 1, 2007
The horror and thrills of the Cameron films is largely absent, replaced by cheesy humor and weightless action sequences. There's practically no reason for this film to exist story-wise, but only die-hards will likely care. Otherwise this should satisfy the summer action movie itch.
July 18, 2015
Terminator 3 comes nowhere near James Cameron's original two films. Not to mention that it seems completely unnecessary, but the fact that Arnold is back and there is tons of action that will keep your attention makes the film entertaining. The special effects are pretty awesome and the supporting cast does a pretty good job, especially Stahl, but the film is just not as good as Cameron's vision.
½ July 18, 2015
Rating: 86%
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines takes a major step down from its predecessors, both creatively and acting-wise, but the threequel still has plenty of eye candy and exhilarating action that fans have come to expect.
July 17, 2015
The Terminator is one of the finest films ever made. What makes the film is its simplicity - it's a monster movie. A big scary robot is stalking a waitress. That's it. What films like T3:RotM and the Hollywood suits who green-light these continuing sequels fail to grasp is that there really isn't any need, or reason, to attempt to further the story. This is because the lore/mythology/backstory is just exposition; the future war, the resistance, John Connor... this is all theoretical stuff that helps build a world for a chase movie to work. You can suspend your disbelief for an hour and half because the backstory is explained well enough that it serves to frame the straightforward action going on and give you enough fuel for your imagination. If you delve into the exposition you can't actually get very far, and in essence the 'franchise' was a dead mechanism after T2. James Cameron knew there was nothing else to show or tell after Judgment Day, and so he let it be. With a story like this you can only really go small and intimate (The Terminator) or go big and bombastic (Terminator 2: Judgment Day); after that anything else is middling and pointless.

And so we arrive at T3:RotM. Probably the least offensive of the post-Cameron efforts, Mostow's film just seems superfluous and vapid. It's not a bad movie, it's well shot, the effects are clean, shiny and generally excellent. The action is entertaining enough, and the set-pieces are well thought out and presented. It's a perfectly serviceable action movie.

The story is a simple rehash of T2 with less Guns and Roses. John Connor has been living in bus shelters and under rocks since he was mentally traumatised back in 1992 and is essentially a hobo. Why, or how this useless hobo presents a threat to Skynet at this point is moot - he is the future leader of the resistance and that's just the way it is. A sexy Terminator (Kristanna Loken) is sent back in time to kill off all the future resistance bods and blah blah blah blah blah. You know the deal here. Good Arnie shows up, fighting commences, and this leads to Skynet's uprising and the eventual nuclear apocalypse.

There are moments in the film that feel almost special - the final scene of the film (the end of the world) almost works visually, and there is a reasonable amount of tension in these moments. But the trouble is the film gives off such a plastic vibe that the payoff isn't there. Do the filmmakers really care? Do the characters even care? Claire Danes' character goes from being a vet to the last survivor of the planet and pulls a few funny faces, quivers her lip a tad and goes on about her business of standing around pulling funny faces. The nuclear apocalypse feels like a set up for a sequel.

The acting is just... there. Nick Stahl is a fine actor but doesnt suit the character of John Conner, who was never meant to be seen as an adult in the first place. He's satisfactory enough but it feels like miscasting. He also has ZERO CHEMISTRY with Claire Danes' Kate Brewster, which is unfortunate. Speaking of Danes, she has seemingly vanished from existence since this film. Maybe she got lost in the convoluted time-travel story that continues to plague this dead franchise. Schwarzenegger continues to highlight these movies; he really is the only thing worth watching. He can play this role in his sleep, and in truth it does feel as though he is on the verge of phoning this one in. The whole male stripper scene is wrong on pretty much every level, but Arnie does his mighty best to make it work.

The film just has no emotion and no reason for existing. For all intents and purposes it is purely a corporate movie. There is no art, or love, in this film. The effects are great, the direction is fine, the acting is perfunctory but the whole package feels so manufactured it never means anything. It's like McDonalds. It does the job but leaves you so underwhelmed you wish you went for the steak.

It just seems to me that the people OK-ing these films will never understand why they keep failing - there is no more story to tell. There never was. Theyre trying to create stories about a hypothetical future that was never meant to actually be realised. In many ways these films represent what happens when you can do something (technologically speaking) but really, maybe, shouldn't. It's too tempting for Hollywood to dip their feet in the water again when people still love the first two films. "But this time it will be bigger and have more robots!" I never felt that the post-apocalyptic stuff was what made the films great - its the implication that the here and now needs to be seen because nobody wants to see the end of the world. Well, here's the end of the world! The end result is kinda flat and uninteresting.

T3:RotM represents, in essence, the fundamental flaw in Hollywood's obsession with sequels - this film doesn't have a soul. It doesn't have a reason for existing.

Apart from the $433.4 million it made.
March 14, 2008
Not quite as good to the first two, but it is still enjoyable and adds more to the story.
July 14, 2015
Terminator 3 was better than I thought it would be. With an almost identical plot to the previous movies, T3 had a decent flow into the Terminator story and held up its dues, While its obviously no where as close to the previous two films originality and promise, I still felt somewhat satisfied.
July 13, 2015
It looses in comparison to the 1 and 2, but it is not bad at all.
½ October 24, 2007
James Cameron abandona la saga de "Terminator" y el resultado es una gran decepción. El director Jonathan Mostow nos entrega una cinta mediocre, sin la originalidad y la maestría en el ritmo de la primera parte y sin los efectos innovadores de la segunda. En esta ocasión aparece una Terminator mujer (Kristianna Loken) que sirve para hacer toda clase de chistes machistas, que deja en entredicho a esa fuerza de la naturaleza que fue Linda Hamilton en la segunda entrega. "Terminator" está terminado.
½ February 16, 2013
Bad casting and characterization of John Conner, even Schwarzenegger's T-101 is boring and really just an asshole. T3 writes an overpowered and uncharismatic T-X, defies physics with stupid stunts, and causes as many needless explosions as possible. They avoid explaining why Judgement Day still occurs simply because the only reason is to cash in on another film. Nothing of importance happens in 'Rise' that couldn't be explained in 5 minutes in 'Salvation', not a single surprise. Gimmicky, poorly shot and with a bad script, somehow the effects are worse here than 12 years before. Just watch 'The Sarah Connor Chronicles' instead, you won't be disappointed you skipped T3.
July 11, 2015
T3 will never top the first two movies, but it's awesome action and amazing ending make this a worthy member of the Terminator franchise.
July 9, 2015
Just because James Cameron isn't involved doesn't mean that this should be written off completely, sure it would have been nice for him to return, and I think people should realize that this could have been a lot worse than it was. That might sound like a backhanded compliment but this film very easily could have been a copy and paste of one of the previous films where the characters just go on the same campaign or alternatively could have been something silly that just didn't try. 'Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines' moves the story forward at a smart place in the timeline with events changed from what was accomplished in the previous films and had some new things to say.

The cast was great, Arnold's Terminator is a more advanced model this time around leading to more comedic interactions and just interactions with human characters in general, which is another advancement that this film offers. I thought the effects were excellent and the action set-pieces were all quite memorable and well put together. One complaint I think most people have is that the film has more humour in it than its predecessor's but like I mentioned earlier, it doesn't have the feeling that nobody is trying or anything. It even has a similar shot in the film that is like the, 'To Protect and Serve', on the police cars in the last two films, where with this one it's a, 'Valley of Peace', on the window of a smashed Hearse. Saying that, the film certainly does have its dark moments and the characters are given time to just sit and talk about what is going on and how they are feeling. And the film still keeps all its iconic moments like the one-liners and the crushed skull, one of the one-liners is, 'I lied', in this film, which must have been done on purpose. Although, it would have been interesting if that character that changes near the end, not saying who it is as to not spoil it, would have stayed the way they changed; but then again, perhaps it wouldn't totally fit.

Out of all the films, I must have seen this one the most and I think that's because I actually owned it on UMD, but I'm not really sure why it gets so much hate, like I previously stated. True, the ending does have a feeling of, 'what was the point?' and does seem to change the whole 'fate' quote from the previous films. But even with that, there is still some hope left at the end about changing everything. If this series was just going to be a trilogy, there could have been a lot worse than this film and I still like it. I'm pretty sure after 'Salvation'; people were looking back more fondly on this.
Super Reviewer
December 12, 2008
"Katherine Brewster, have you sustained any injuries?"
"Drop dead, you asshole!"
"I am unable to comply."

Don't understand why a lot of people didn't like this sequel as I thought T3 was a lot of fun. Stubborn Cameron loyalists? While the screenplay progression echoes with series familiarity, the T1 & T2 references all clicked with the right amount of humor; Arnie's traditional introductory search for clothes and sunglasses gag is a good example. Plenty of spectacular, OTT Terminator-style action scenes including the incredible firetruck/semi chase/mayhem. Only the nonsensical bathroom brawl and and overly prolonged final fight with the TX felt like excess baggage during this thrillride. Kristanna Loken is made-to-order deadly gorgeous as the new Terminator although she is given even less personality than T2's liquid metalman Robert Patrick. However, adding two legit top-drawer actors to the cast gives this entry an extra boost that you could forgive being absent in the first two movies. Nick Stahl gives John Connor the right level of trepidation and survivalist savvy that a burden of knowing you're supposed to become a hero in the future would bring. Meanwhile, Claire Danes' bountiful skill turns a character that on paper exists mostly to scream and flee into a 3-dimensional woman coming to grips with sudden loss and the horrifying knowledge of what is to come. The great gutsy ending was a real surprise bombshell - literally. On the DVD, the commentary track includes a lot of Arnie which is always gold and there's a very funny deleted scene that finally explains why all the T-800 series models look & sound like him. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines favorably advances the overall story while successfully avoiding the common sequel trap of feeling like a cash-grab, which makes the first 3 Terminators the most satisfyingly entertaining trio of action movies behind only the original Star Wars and Lord of the Rings trilogies.
July 5, 2015
While some of this disappointing excuse for a 3rd film in a powerful epic film series may contain some slight interest due to having copied much of its formula from Terminator 2 Judgment Day, T3 lacks the same charm as James Cameron substance and relies heavily too much on special effects, long boring car chases, screamings of STOP IT STOP IT and pointless talks about time travel to be even called an addition to the Terminator movie series.
½ July 8, 2015
This sequel is Definitely Underrated! It is an attractive addition to the Terminator Franchise even if the storyline/plot and ending is overstuffed!
½ June 25, 2012
Characters and plot take a backseat to shoddy CGI effects in this third film. Fortunately Arnold is is there to pull the film forward and keep it from losing momentum.
August 25, 2012
While it lacks the heart and charm of its predecessor, Terminator 3 still has a handful of impressive action sequences, and the return of Schwarzenegger.
Page 3 of 708