Jen Gets Terminated, Day 2: Terminator 2: Judgment Day

We revisit the Terminator franchise, one movie per day, leading up to Terminator Salvation.



Day Two: Terminator 2: Judgment Day (97%)

Terminator 2: Judgment Day is and always has been the Terminator movie closest to my heart. It's probably due to the fact that I watched T2 repeatedly on cable as a child -- I was 10 years old when it was first released, and an HBO/Cinemax junkie through adolescence -- and, I can admit now without shame, I majorly crushed on little Edward Furlong throughout the '90s. (Aerosmith's "Livin' on the Edge" music video, anyone?)

But it was only while watching T2 again as an adult that I began to appreciate its complexities. Yes, it's an action film about a robot from the future who blows s*** up, but it's also a story about human nature and the bonds of love and friendship; a self-reflexive but not overly self-aware sequel; and a technical marvel of a movie that employs the most special of special effects and puts all of its insanely expensive budget on screen.


T2: Judgment Day opens, as does the first film, on a desolate glimpse of the future. Again, it's Los Angeles circa 2029 A.D. and rebel humans skirmish with deadly machines on the battlefield -- only this battlefield is revealed to be a former playground littered with human skulls, a foreshadowing to the recurring nightmare that returning heroine Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) has throughout the present, the year 1995. (So too does the production quality reveal familiar visuals that feel different; here, James Cameron's bigger budget is immediately evident: among sets with actual depth of field, endoskeleton Terminators walk and shoot humans with the fluidity of CG rather than jerky stop motion animation. Even the lasers look more modern.)

Back in 1995, it's been ten years since Sarah Connor gave birth to her son John, conceived with resistance fighter from the future Kyle Reese before his untimely (or timely) death in Terminator. As two Terminators touch down from the future -- one sent to kill the young John, the other sent to protect him -- Sarah Connor prepares herself for the battle ahead while locked in a mental hospital. Like Reese in the first film, Sarah tries in vain to warn authorities of the pending Judgment Day, when a nuclear blast will decimate humankind; unsurprisingly, no one -- especially the superbly slimy Earl Boen, reprising his role as psych evaluator Dr. Silberman -- believes her. As the reprogrammed Terminator Model T800 (Arnold Schwarzenegger) joins forces with the Connors, the trio attempts to battle a newer model Terminator (Robert Patrick) and destroy the technology that will eventually lead to the creation of SkyNet.


As happens through the entire film, we're treated to frequent nods to the first film that validate and add new dimension to our Terminator-like memories. (Remember how the Governator first lands from the future, in his nude crouch? Or how he beats up some local thugs for clothing?) Where the Terminator in the first film was deadly and ruthless, in T2 he's menacing, but practically a pacifist. The decision to turn him from villain to hero (and Sarah Connor from wallflower to warrior woman) was simply genius -- a character reborn anew that critic David Ansen termed "Conan the Humanitarian."

The new old Terminator also becomes an underdog with the introduction of a newer model: the T1000, a mighty morphin' Terminator made of liquid metal who can mimic any human form and voice (Robert Patrick). Suddenly the muscled, lumbering T800 is an obsolete model to which the shape-shifting, metal armed-T1000 seems invincible. Thanks to this juxtaposition, we learn to accept the Terminator as not only a physical underdog, but a hero to be pitied and rooted for. (What match is he for the Oscar-winning CGI effects of ILM, whose metal morphing effects resemble those they created for Cameron's The Abyss?)


Beyond the Terminator/T1000 match up, it's the Terminator's fundamental personality shift that makes T2 so compelling. The T800 is alternately pet and father figure to the ten-year-old John Connor (Furlong), a rebellious young tech prodigy in the making who wears a Public Enemy t-shirt under a camo jacket and rips ATMS for cash when not playing Missile Command and After Burner with his friend, the mulleted redhead kid from Salute Your Shorts (Danny Cooksey).

(Small details like this date T2, but not distractingly so. For that matter, let's give a shout out to Jenette Goldstein AKA Vasquez from Aliens as John's foster mom! )

Back to that "boy and his robot" dynamic. After meeting in an iconic hallway shoot-out scene that recalls the slow-motion dance club shoot-out in Terminator (threatening stalker-type saves a Connor from actual killer, takes them on the run), John and his cyborg pal develop a deeply moving relationship that gives T2 its most compelling emotional resonance. John teaches his 'bot slang, how to smile, where humans like to leave their car keys; the Terminator in turn gives the young Connor a steadfast protector and father figure, a fact that Sarah Connor herself notes in one of the film's many voice-overs.


As the story progresses, robot and human trade roles; the T800 becomes more compassionate, Sarah more machinelike. Bent on changing the future (or history, depending on your vantage point) as told to her by our dear, departed Kyle Reese, Sarah sets off to prove that there is "no fate," hoping that she can save the future by assassinating the scientist due to invent Terminator technology. Between the events of Terminator and T2, Sarah Connor has become a woman on a mission --- get strong, be tough, learn military tactics, and protect John -- but her training has pushed her too far. (Incidentally, given the obvious physical and weapons training that Hamilton did in preparation for the role, this has to be one of the most dedicated thespian transformations in movie history.)

They say that guns don't kill people; people kill people. In T2, weapon and human are equally dangerous. As the Terminator's "master," John exercises responsibility by forbidding human casualties, even in the interest of his own safety, while Sarah nearly kills scientist Miles Dyson (the excellent Joe Morton) to save her son; Dyson himself is blithely creating the technology that will wipe out humankind in the interest of national security. T2's anti-violence message is a subtle thread woven throughout its story, present between explosions, firebombs, and blasts of gunfire.


The specter of the first film looms constantly over T2, whether through visual reference (a bloody X-acto knife, the blue hues of technology-themed scenes) or dialogue ("I'll be back," Arnold assures the Connors as he confronts a lobby teeming with SWAT). It also dredges up the age-old sci-fi problem -- time travel and the causality loop -- but smartly addresses it in a single scene; John explains the story of his birth to the Terminator, including how in 35 years his future self will send Kyle Reese back to 1984. "It messes with your head," he complains, echoing my sentiments. Which came first -- John knowing Reese was his father, or John sending him back in time? Cameron and co-writer William Wisher seem to be telling us not to put too much thought into the matter.

Ultimately, the brilliance of Terminator 2: Judgment Day is that it's a sequel which not only continues its original story, but also builds upon and expands it in terms of storytelling, theme, and scope. T2 is the rare case where a sequel is better than the original, though it never forgets its debt to the first film; it would be nothing without, and yet is much more than, the first Terminator.


Tomorrow, see how well we like the new John Connor, the new lady Terminator, and Claire Danes in Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (AKA Terminator 3: My So Called Future).

Jen Gets Terminated Dates:

Comments

CynDaVaz

Cyneva Dalton-Vazquez

Terminator 2 . . . my favorite movie of all time. I never get tired of watching it.

May 19 - 06:17 PM

silvercell@hotmail.com

Bam Mercutio

I too was ten when this film hit theaters and loved it then for its robots and explosions. It wasn't until I watched it years later I fell in love again, this time for its complexity and heart as well as its robots and explosions. Classic.

May 19 - 06:21 PM

infernaldude

Infernal Dude

T2 is one of the best films ever put on celluloid. I remember seeing it the theater. What an experience. There was an argument on an earlier article about whether or not Terminator has "depth". I think you hit the nail on the head Jen when you say that its more than an action film. Regardless of how bad T3 is and T4 will be, we will always have this gem.

Thumbs up as I'm lowered into molten metal.

May 19 - 06:29 PM

Cougar D.

Cougar Date

--== Cougarster.Com ==-- Best Cougar dating site in the world!
For Cougars, dating a younger man can be exciting and feel younger. And also you may find yourself more compatible with young men.
For younger men, dating an older woman has numerous advantages. You can sometimes learn valuable advice from her on how to conduct himself in a difficult situation. She is your best listener and supporter.
Join us and contact tens of thousands of cougars and cougar admirers!

May 19 - 06:45 PM

TombstoneLawDog

Daniel Klein

Oh, and for those at RT not paying attention, 'Cougar D' is a spambot, wasting the rest of our valuable nerd-venting time and space. PLEASE DESTROY WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE.

May 20 - 05:43 AM

KingSigy

Numna Stingdoo

T2 is amazing. I'm not sure if I would say anything is dated other than clothing in this film, though. Yeah, GNR don't really exist, but the special effects were massively ahead of their time (thanks in part to Tool guitarist Adam Jones).

May 19 - 06:51 PM

infernaldude

Infernal Dude

Nice mention of Adam Jones. What exactly did he do for the movie? I knew he worked on special effects but I'm not sure where. Definitely make-up or model effects, eh.

May 19 - 07:02 PM

JAKEofMIDWORLD

Jake Almond

Yes Make-Up or model effects. He did a great job working with Stan Winston on multiple movies. Tool is a great ****ing band too.

May 20 - 08:59 AM

KingSigy

Numna Stingdoo

I believe Adam Jones did the modeling and some of the CGI. It's never really been told on any of the special features, unless I just forgot about it. I'll have to dig up more on that.

May 20 - 11:54 AM

John D.

John Doyle

Everyone loves T2, me included. Again, i love how you just can't stop the T1000, ever. Oh, sorry, forgot to mention, if you have a boiling pit of molten metal then you can, no worries!!!

May 19 - 06:55 PM

RamALamADingDong

That Guy

It's one of those rare movies that's perfect all around. Between being a good movie, good sequel, and good special effects. It's done so much.

"Ultimately, the brilliance of Terminator 2: Judgment Day is that it's a sequel which not only continues its original story, but also builds upon and expands it in terms of storytelling, theme, and scope. T2 is the rare case where a sequel is better than the original, though it never forgets its debt to the first film; it would be nothing without, and yet is much more than, the first Terminator."
My sentiments exactly. Truly one of the best sequels ever. Especially difficult considering just how good the first one is. And the special effects can easily stand up against anything coming out today.

I first saw this on TV when I was six years old. I loved watching it then and every single time since. I never once got bored watching it.

May 19 - 07:03 PM

Dominem007

Dominik Choczynski

Great review Jen!

I am awaiting your take on Terminator Salvation...but I am steadily losing hope....if MCG screwed this up, then I will be very very dissapointed! This is one of my favorite movie franchises of all time...I even somewhat enjoyed parts of T3...

May 19 - 07:39 PM

inactive user

Jared King

I don't have much time, so I'll read this tomorrow. But, this is one of the best sci-fi's evah! 10/10.

May 19 - 07:58 PM

DarthWonka

Jesse Rodgers

This,The Empire Strikes Back, The Dark Knight, and Godfather Part II represent a very small league of sequels that "not only continues its original story, but also builds upon and expands it in terms of storytelling, theme, and scope."

May 19 - 07:59 PM

sorcerer's_cat

Tracy Brown

Darthwonka, I'd add "Aliens" to that list of sequels that expand on the mythology. I'll never forget the "wow" moment of anticipation when Ripley asked "So who's laying these eggs?"

May 20 - 01:41 PM

Michael B.

Michael Bracken

Inside Terminator 2 was something I never expected , a movie that equaled the original and more so. Of course bigger is better in Hollywood when it comes to movies , in this case it actually worked. The only thing that was missing from the second that we have today is the movie was never presented in IMAX... now that would have Rocked! I was in my teens and the message in the film was as strong then as it is today . I was not a fan on the third installment and I%u2019m hopeful that Salvation will be just that, redeeming the franchise that is as much a part of the American history.

May 19 - 08:03 PM

Jason C Wilkerson

Jason Wilkerson

Yeah, bigger is better in Hollywood, but it's very rare that you also get bigger and better plot and character development as we get here. Cameron really did do a bang up job and this is probably my second favorite sci-fi film after the director's cut of Blade Runner.

It would have been my favorite, but I have two problems with this movie. 1) Some of Sarah Connor's narration is too "on the nose" especially in descibing John's relationship to the Terminator. Stuff like that I wish would have just been left unsaid and described in John's talk about father-figures lost and his growing adoration of the Terminator.

2) It still feels to me like they changed the rules of the game with this movie. While there was talk in the first movie that you can change fate, it still seemed to say that you can't change fate. I felt like that was the whole point of Kyle fathering John, that was going to happen no matter what, it was fate. But I also feel that if your past is the future, if you change the future then your past changes as well. If Judgement Day never happens, then Kyle wouldn't have a reason to go back, if Kyle doesn't go back then John would never be born.

I know some people don't want to think about it too much, but I still feel this is a major plot hole in the logic of Terminator 2. These are the only two things that detract from the movie for me though.

May 20 - 09:25 AM

JohnnyJonJon

Jonathan Groen

I admit I've thought about that plothole quite a bit myself, especially before the 3rd movie came out. Theoretically, John wouldn't exist if Judgment Day never happened, but it occurred to me that his continued existence suggested that Judgment Day would eventually happen, as explained in the 3rd movie. One has to wonder if that ever occurred to Sarah or John following the events of T2, but I guess that's the last thing they would think about.

Another plothole about T2 bothered me for years, and somewhat still confuses me. John is born in 1984, and we assume he's about 12 or 13 in T2. Ahhnold tells John that he was reprogrammed and sent back through time 35 years. Assuming he was sent back in 2029 (the same year as the first terminator was sent), that would make it 1994, and John would only be 10. One might figure that the 2nd terminator could be sent back a few years later, but Reese tells the cops in the 1st film that the time displacement machine was blown up shortly after he was sent. Maybe I'm missing something completely or just overanalyzing. It doesn't really bother me. It just gave me something to think about.

It was my 9th birthday, and my mom took me to my first R-rated movie in theatres, and it was this masterpiece. I've made several top 10 lists over the years for my favorite films, and T2 always shows up in my top 3. Brilliant film!

May 20 - 10:09 AM

Jason C Wilkerson

Jason Wilkerson

Well, with the advent of T3 (a grab to keep the franchise open and show that Judgement Day is still going to happen) there's proof that they didn't prevent it. But hardly anyone looks at T3 as "cannon", so to speak, and Cameron has said that he was trying to end the series and say that they prevented Judgement Day. In reality, when Kyle Reese jumped into the past, the future also became the past and there's no way to change that. That's a huge plot whole in Judgement Day. Other than that I don't know what plot holes quietus28 is talking about.

I don't really think the age thing is a plot hole. I have to go back and watch the movie, but if you're assuming he was sent back from 2029, then he might have been sent back from a later date making this point moot.

May 20 - 11:30 AM

ColinTheCimmerian

Colin Hay

John is 10 in T2 (even though he really doesn't seem like it, and Furlong obviously wasn't that young at the time). As I recall, when the T-1000 looks up his profile on the computer in the police cruiser he takes, his age is stated as 10 amongst the other information. So it's not a plot hole or a logic flaw in the traditional sense, but definitely a slip-up in the writing, because John definitely didn't seem much like a 10 year old in my mind. I would say it was a casting error, but I think Furlong was what Cameron was looking for; I'm just guessing Cameron had no sweet clue what a 10 year old behaves like.

May 20 - 05:10 PM

JohnnyJonJon

Jonathan Groen

See, that's what I was thinking too. I also take notice of the fact that it is possible that the 2nd terminator could've been sent several years after 2029, but that would make the date of T2 close to 1997, the year of Judgment Day. The terminator explains to Sarah that it would be several years before Miles Dyson developed the super processor that would eventually become Skynet. So, we have to assume that the events of T2 had to occur at least 2 to 3 years before 1997, which gives us our plothole. Maybe you're right about the casting of John. It would've been nearly impossible to find a 10-year-old who would've fit the plot as well as Eddie did. I guess James Cameron was hoping no one would take notice.

May 20 - 07:29 PM

Jason C Wilkerson

Jason Wilkerson

Wait, 35 years before 2029 is 1994 which puts it perfectly in the timeline. I know I've seen people who look older than their actual age (my daughter looked 5 when she was 3, and had the smarts of a 5 or 6 year old). So where is the plothole again?

May 20 - 09:05 PM

JohnnyJonJon

Jonathan Groen

Well if he's really 10, that sure is an early puberty. Hell, if I caught my 10-year-old son riding through LA on a dirtbike, I'd kick the crap out of him (and I wouldn't care if he's the savior of the freakin' world).

May 20 - 09:28 PM

Jason C Wilkerson

Jason Wilkerson

Nevermind, I get it. Here's the thing, how would Kyle know that it was really blown up after he went back in time? John probably told him that when he sent him back in time, but new he would need it again to send a Terminator back to save himself because it happened. He probably knew that Kyle was in love with Sarah, and wanted to assure him that she was going to be safe. Kind of like the fact that he hid the fact that Kyle was his father.

May 20 - 09:09 PM

manwithoutfear19

Daniel Raimondi

T2 was the best of the 3 the third one ruined it but i hope the new one will be better!

May 19 - 08:51 PM

shane f.

shane fenton

Well done, Jen.

T2 was T1 all over again but with better dialogue, better humour, much improved special effects (incredible) and a perfect villian. Sarah Conner was the only weak spot having suddenly become a superwoman with fighting skills to die for! But thanks most likely thanks to the North American political correctness dudes (& dudesses)invading Hollywood. It's the wonderful special effects that make it what it is though, and Arnold is superb in it.

T3 was ok, but not one for the memory banks. I hold no hope at all for T4. Christian Bale? No way - too intense and one dimensional. Fans would prefer to see a old age grandad Arnold instead. T4 will just be explosions, a weak script, explosions again, dark, more explosions... just think Alien 3 (how dull and grey was that?).

Anyway, T2 rules!

May 19 - 08:53 PM

Warheart1188

Tim Higginbotham

It's funny how many of us saw this as young kids when rated-R movies were supposed to be "bad" for us yet parents didn't seem to bother too much. It's not the same these days. They don't market rated-R movies these to kids anymore. My life changed when I saw T1 and T2. Step aside Star Wars, Indiana Jones, and Batman. The Terminator was and still is something else.

May 19 - 09:00 PM

Gavin D.

Gavin Doughtie

I think T2 is an *awesome* film and one of the best sequels ever. However, I think the film James Cameron directed immediately before this one is actually *the* best sequel ever: Aliens.

May 19 - 09:01 PM

willywonkanobi

Evan Godbold

I agree, Gavin D.

I actually like all 3 of the franchise, including the third one. This one is of course the best.

Warheart1188, it is funny that you say that about it not bothering you. I too saw this at a very young age, when sleeping over at a friend's house. I was probably 7 or 8, and I was pretty much scarred for life from that nuclear holocaust playground scene! But I still liked the movie a LOT! And I still do.

May 19 - 09:57 PM

Feat747

B. Hashim

Easily the best Terminator film.
I also saw & fell in love with T2 as a kid.

May 19 - 09:33 PM

Daniel Aaron

Daniel Gentry

T2 was a great film even though at the time it came out I wished for more future war well now we get it the envelope pushing liquid metal efx for the time amazing you cant knock the film at all but I will say this. They ruined a perfectley good oppertunity for mass carnage in the mini gun scean with all the cops.Yes he was a good guy i guess but seeing dudes torn apart by a mini gun would have been epic. I saw the first one when I was in my early teens so I was expecing more carnage but alas to each his own. Oh and the thumbs up at the end was way to corny for me but now at 37 I have softend up a bit and it kinda can draw a tear. But when it came out..trash.( i think i was 21 i cant remember) they have all been good we will see what they do here they seem to have a budget again.(T3 was cool enough to keep it alive plus I thought the ending was perfect it shut the door on anymore pre skynet crap not that it was bad they can still show a lot of back story if they want) Anyway you a cool Chick keep it up at RT :)

May 19 - 10:11 PM

CynDaVaz

Cyneva Dalton-Vazquez

"I hold no hope at all for T4. Christian Bale? No way - too intense and one dimensional. Fans would prefer to see a old age grandad Arnold instead."

This is a generally incorrect comment, especially as it pertains to this ardent Terminator fan. Christian Bale's intensity (and the fact that he isn't one-dimensional) is what makes him perfect for the role. Just like he's perfect as Bruce Wayne. And the Terminator TV show proved to me beyond any doubt that this franchise can indeed be enjoyable without Arnold.

May 19 - 10:21 PM

CynDaVaz

Cyneva Dalton-Vazquez

"Oh and the thumbs up at the end was way to corny for me but now at 37 I have softend up a bit and it kinda can draw a tear. But when it came out..trash.( i think i was 21 i cant remember)"

I always loved that thumbs up at the end . . . even at the age of 20 when I first saw it. Now at 37, it still tugs at my heartstrings. :-)

May 19 - 10:24 PM

CynDaVaz

Cyneva Dalton-Vazquez

"Oh and the thumbs up at the end was way to corny for me but now at 37 I have softend up a bit and it kinda can draw a tear. But when it came out..trash.( i think i was 21 i cant remember)"

I always loved that thumbs up at the end . . . even at the age of 20 when I first saw it. Now at 37, it still tugs at my heartstrings. :-)

May 19 - 10:28 PM

What's Hot On RT

Total Recall
Total Recall

Bradley Cooper's Best Movies

Critics Consensus
Critics Consensus

Fast & Furious 6 is Certified Fresh

24 Frames
24 Frames

Fast & Furious cars gallery

Summer Movie Scorecard
Summer Movie Scorecard

Blockbusters ranked!

Help | About | Jobs | Critics Submission | API | Licensing | Mobile