Article Ratings & Comments
(1-20 of 369 posts) | Reply
on Jul 14 2008 11:38 AM Get ready for an asswhoppin'. (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:40 AM Again, with the people that don't know Batman. The movie is serious because the comic was serious. Batman is a serious figure. (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:41 AM I don't even get what you're trying to say. From your review, this is what I hear: "Everyone is saying this movie is great, well, I'm not like everyone else! Wow this movie is awful! Lalalala. See!" (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:42 AM oooh another! (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:42 AM I oughta throw a batarang in your eye. (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:43 AM I don't have a problem with negative reviews. I have a problem with negative reviews that base their reasoning on stupid, stupid assertions. Saying that TDK isn't good because it isn't "fun" enough and because it tries to be serious is as dumb a statement as a critic could make. If the movie is too fun, then it needs to be more serious. If the movie isn't fun enough, then it's "in love with itself". Come the **** on. (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:43 AM there will always be one who hates the popularity a movie gets so much they wont see its greatness (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:44 AM why can't a comic book movie be serious? i don't get it. nobody complains that dramas aren't funny enough. (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:44 AM ? (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:44 AM This guy is gonna wish he'd never been born after the fanboys get to him (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:45 AM ..........you suck congratulations. (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:45 AM you just said that the reason this movie was bad is because it is trying to be deeper than most other comic book movies. Other critics say that this is the movies greatest achievement not its shortcoming. Why is it a crime for a movie to be deep rather than just mind numbing action? Maybe you just couldnt comprehend the complexity and seriousness that this movie brought to the table. (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:46 AM And here we go... (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:46 AM It's not 1950, idiot. (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:46 AM And here. we. go... again (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:47 AM Surprise surprise... another critic stuck in the long expired notion that comic books and comic book based movies all should be written and made for kids. Dumbass. (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:47 AM I read this review, and I already know without seeing the movie that I won't possibly come to his conclusions about the movie being too serious or 'in love with itself'. Batman is a dark storyline. From his description, it's true to the source material. Therefore I don't see his criticisms as being valid. (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:47 AM We all knew this was going to happen. Not everyone can be the same and like the same thing. Come on, we sound like a bunch of Nazis. So let's all do the adult thing and....tattoo a swastika on his head and KKK across his chest and through him in the middle of Harlem. (Reply to this) |
|
on Jul 14 2008 11:48 AM I think your a little too in love with yourself Marshall Fine! Im sorry some movie directors actually want to make a legitimate movie and not another kid friendly round-edged movie like you wanted! (Reply to this) |
on Jul 14 2008 11:48 AM Star Magazine? Heh. (Reply to this) |
IGN RSS Feeds