I mean, sure, a film has plotholes, every film has them, but many panned this film staying a lot of plotholes, but i've noticed many of this called "plotholes" are not actual plotholes. This was caused by lack of attention to the story, it's progression and development. One example is when Bruce comes out of the prison, and we seen him apparently the next day in Gotham already. Yet no one in the movie states that just one day has passed, actually i heard that weeks have passed instead. Others said Batamn couldn't possibly survive the explotion and that no explination of how he could survive is given. But only those who pay attention to the film know that Bruce fixed the autopilot of the Batplane months ago, as discovered by Fox scenes after Bruce's apparent sacrifice, then Batman could have jumped off the Batplane any time after he got really away from the city, at one point where no one in the city could see him. There's a lot of apparent plotholes that are fixed, but no one cares, it's like many simply hate this film just because it's not like The Dark Knight. In my opinion, this film is superior, and well, if it isn't, that doesn't mean it's an awful film, it's actually a great one by itself, and i think each of the three Nolan Batman films should be rated and taked as one of their kind isntead of films that depend on the success of the others.
Dylan Morgan
there are plot holes in all the films, but they stood out so obviously in this film. The entire stock market scenario, for instance?
- technical issues, jumps between day and night
- the bikes, where did they come from?
- how could they have gotten away with it? why did they accept that wayne's stock did what it did when the exchange was taken under control by a hostile group and that it was the only action to have been taken during that time
Apr 27 - 08:16 AM