Rotten Tomatoes
-
-
Opening this week
-
76%
-
29%
-
83%
-
Movies
-
-
New on DVD
-
85%
-
45%
-
40%
-
DVD
-
-
Who's In Theaters This Weekend?
Celebrities
-
-
What's Hot on Rotten Tomatoes
News
-
-
Spotlight
Critics
Top Critic
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.
Matias Sabaj
if this was Facebook,I would "Like" this comment.
Jul 16 - 02:13 PM
Juan Huaylla
well said brother
Jul 16 - 02:16 PM
This comment has been removed.
Chris Wilcox
THAT was well said.
Jul 16 - 02:29 PM
Ian Carvalho
Guido - Nolan's films are arguably already more iconic. And Who are you to judge someone's maturity when you spend most of your day trolling a movie website?
Jul 16 - 02:42 PM
Chase Bahr
Guido V- But see, 3 movies is a kinda unfair way to look at it, because it's not just 3 movies, it's over ten years in the universe of the films. A few years between BB and TDK and 8 years between TDK and TDKR. That's a long time for a man without powers(spider-man, superman) to do anything let alone save the biggest city on Earth over and over again. I don't think it's particularly fair to say Joker is playing second fiddle to Bane, as the Joker is already called among the top 5 or so screen villains in history, and if they were to recast him it would just be dumb even if some other actor did an amazing job. The one thing I would fight you to the death (message board-style) about is who is the better Joker. It's obviously Ledger. Nicholson was great, but he was a clown. Yes, the Joker appears to be a clown. But how menacing is a man who prances around and cackles, wearing bright purple full-body suits and has flowers that spray acid or just water or w/e? If the Joker were a real villain, someone we would buy as a real human being in this world (as we buy a man dressing like a bat fighting crime) it has to be like Ledger's joker. Not a clown who worked for the mob, but an insane person who grew up in an abusive home, who let the dark underbelly of Gotham crawl under his skin and inhabit him, who smears paint on his face and wears something that looks like he found it under a dumpster and put razor blades in his mouth to make him look like he's smiling. That is evil. Nicholson, on the other hand, probably read 3 or 4 comics and said "Okay wardrobe, make me look like a clown!"
Jul 16 - 06:50 PM
Geoffrey Shauger
What an idiot
Jul 16 - 02:27 PM
Chris Wilcox
i disagree with almost everything you said. Minus parts of the first paragraph.
Jul 16 - 02:28 PM
This comment has been removed.
Daniel Davis
DC movies only affect WB. DC gets nothing from the profits.
Jul 16 - 02:51 PM
swe star
If we're going to constantly compare this to the iconic joker performance then I guess TDKR will always loose some points in critics eyes who by now are expecting that same momentum. It cant be done get over it! It's not a comparison but a complementary piece to the batman begins essentially part 2 - adding value to that nooanistic batmanverse if you see in that light then this review looses its main points.
Jul 16 - 02:31 PM
san ti
its come to point where these so called critics are going to be questioned hard. what a joke some of these critics are.
Jul 16 - 03:27 PM
Joanne Newton
Zauri, you appear highly arrogant.
Jul 16 - 04:18 PM
Ryan Nolan
Zauri, I've seen you trolling other websites with the same garbage. People here are just hoping for a good movie and aren't too concerned that Batman isn't fighting Zombies or other supernatural beings that you so called 'Batman purest' crave so much.
I'm not going to bash Cristy for her opinion but it seems a bit odd to me to base a film's worth almost solely on the success of the previous installment. Just because she doesn't like this as much as The Dark Knight she gives it a bad review, but she doesn't even have the guts to give it a star rating, probably because she thinks its a 3/5 film (her review read like it) but she doesn't want it to get a positive on the RT meter in case she loses some hits.
Jul 16 - 04:25 PM
Jesse Hornick
Why did she put a noose around her neck???
Jul 16 - 06:29 PM