The Hunger Games

Katherine Padyash

Just finished listening of his review, and he's give it an A . Is it 5 out of 5?
And in the tomatos placed 4/5 (((

Mar 22 - 01:37 PM

Rachael Sheffield Alagna

Gotta say I'm very confused about that too.

Mar 22 - 01:42 PM

David Long

He gives A+ as 5/5. I'm not sure why it isn't 4.5 but none the less a good review.

Mar 22 - 01:47 PM

Rachael Sheffield Alagna

Ah, yeah the A+ thing makes sense. Definitely seems like A should be 4.5/5 though.

Mar 22 - 01:56 PM

Jason Anderson

Yeah, I would think 'A-' or 'B+' would be a 4/5. An 'A' would be 4.5, and 'A+' would be 5/5.

Mar 22 - 02:10 PM

Matthew Kitson

Through all the countless critics, have to say I rely on Roeper the most

Mar 22 - 03:23 PM

Thomas Medford

Probably the only critic that I trust 100%. Good to hear he loved it.

Mar 22 - 04:32 PM

Chip McNair

Roeper and Berardinelli are easily my favorite movie critics on this site, so I'm happy they both really liked it.

Mar 22 - 11:50 PM

Yilver Bravo

amazing book and movie

Mar 23 - 01:08 PM

jim gazan

Richard, no way was this movie well directed and you know it!

Mar 23 - 11:55 PM

tim campbell

It wasn't that it was well acted (though there was no lack of talent). It was that the editing was adequate. Editing and time spent getting enough scene footage (takes) to work with is far more important than acting ability in movies for America.

Look at the numbers folks. This movie is listing close to the same percentages as Avatar. I don't care how you slice it The Hunger Games is _not_that_good_. Not that Avatar's numbers weren't a little high but clearly Avatar is at minimum a full 10% better.

Mar 26 - 09:39 AM

Chip McNair

Who cares? I liked the movie more than Avatar; doesn't matter to me whether or not other people thinks it's better.

Mar 28 - 08:23 AM

Barry Anderson

This is nothing more than a teenage slasher flick. 24 in 22 dead. With a ridiculous premise. Might as well been Jason and Friday the 13th. You all been duped.

Apr 3 - 05:53 PM