The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring

Nathan Kintzer

die in a fire

Nov 29 - 08:14 PM

Jared Jeffers

Now that this movie is considered a classic, I'm sure this jack-off realized what a goober he is.

Mar 27 - 08:40 PM

Daniel Furfaro

Calling a masterpiece crap doesn't make you a great critic - just a jaded killjoy.

May 23 - 04:51 PM

Josh Janney

I saw the movie before I read the books and I wasnt bored for a minute. This guy is an idiot.

May 28 - 12:43 PM

Efrain Sanchez

I can't even understand what this guy is saying.

Aug 30 - 01:54 AM

Jack Wangstein

This asshole of a critic is using his overwrought language as arrogantly as possible in a condescending manner basically to show that he's so much higher above everybody because he's all cultured and shit. I think he's just got his head stuck up pretty far up his ass.
But in terms of exactly what he said, here's the review in colloquial terms:
"People who have read and are familiar with Tolkien's works will not find the movie to be long and boring, but for those who have not read his books before watching the movie, the saying 'less is more' is worth listening to."
I admit I have not read his books before the movie, and I was never bored for a second in the movie. It can definitely stand alone as a masterpiece of storytelling and cinematics.

Sep 10 - 08:59 AM

Opening this week

Movies

New on DVD

DVD

Who's In Theaters This Weekend?

Celebrities

What's Hot on Rotten Tomatoes

News

Spotlight

Critics

Critic Review - New York Magazine

Comments