First (Reader) Review of "Harry Potter 5"
That illustrious film critic "Rosncranz" has graced AICN with their very first review of "Harry Potter and the Fifth Movie of Seven," and it seems like he liked the flick.
You know the drill on reader reviews: I just scan around and find a benign yet hopefully pithy piece to quote, and then I just leave it up to you as far as the rest of the article goes. So here's my snippet: "So if you liked the last two films style, you will like this. This film is not much different from the last entries in the series. I really appreciated the depth of Harry’s character in this, they actually give Harry something to do and he deals with some interesting things in a more real and rounded way."
There you go. Someone other than you has already seen "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix." (Then again this guy thought "The Number 23" was better than its reviews indicate, and that's just plain wrong.)
Source: AICN
You know the drill on reader reviews: I just scan around and find a benign yet hopefully pithy piece to quote, and then I just leave it up to you as far as the rest of the article goes. So here's my snippet: "So if you liked the last two films style, you will like this. This film is not much different from the last entries in the series. I really appreciated the depth of Harry’s character in this, they actually give Harry something to do and he deals with some interesting things in a more real and rounded way."
There you go. Someone other than you has already seen "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix." (Then again this guy thought "The Number 23" was better than its reviews indicate, and that's just plain wrong.)
Source: AICN
Related Items
| Movie: | Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix |
(1-5 of 5 posts) | Reply
 on Mar 06 2007 09:24 AM Hi, Bland. I mean Ann. (Reply to this) |
|
on Mar 06 2007 02:39 PM A Hamlet reference and an Arrested Development reference. At least you people have good taste. Well, some of you. (Reply to this) |
|
on Mar 06 2007 03:11 PM [b]Harry Potter and the Order of the Pheonix![/b] If anybody actually read his review, and you read the book you will realize that the guy has no idea what he's actually talking about. Umbridge is suppose to be freaking annoying. Also, I want to say that I'm a huge fan of all of Alfonso Cuaron's work, but although Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban had style and visuals it was....well....just plain boring. I mean come on now, nothing exciting happens, I know Alfonso tries to introduce psycolgical fears and challenges to the main charchter leaving the viewer completely out of the picture. I give him an A for trying but the movie is simply B-O-R-I-N-G. Best Potter movies in Order: 1. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 2. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets 3. Harry Potter and the Philospher's Stone 4. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban P.S : Please don't give me any'' that movie has more substance'' remarks cause I beliave action can contain substance. And ''Secrets'' and ''Goblet'' display that very well. (Reply to this) |
 on Mar 07 2007 01:03 AM Is this re-evaluation of situation the RT version of "first"? When did this happen? How come I missed this? (Reply to this) |
|
on May 10 2007 09:35 PM I agree with titus on the order of movies except for 1 thing. azkaban trumps secrets... i think they have gotten progressively better. as have the books...i think that's what jk intended (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |
IGN RSS Feeds