Average Rating: 7.5/10
Reviews Counted: 21
Fresh: 20 | Rotten: 1
Eerily prescient in its presentation of a dystopian future, Things to Come's special effects may be somewhat dated, but its potent ideas haven't aged at all.
Average Rating: N/A
Critic Reviews: 3
Fresh: 2 | Rotten: 1
Eerily prescient in its presentation of a dystopian future, Things to Come's special effects may be somewhat dated, but its potent ideas haven't aged at all.
liked it
Average Rating: 3.3/5
User Ratings: 1,923
H. G. Wells was both the author of the original source -- an essay, rather than an actual novel, concerning mankind's future -- and the screenplay (in conjunction with Lajos Biro) of this epic science fiction tale, but it was producer Alexander Korda who framed the terms on which it is presented, vast and elegant, and visually striking. Opening in the year 1940, we see the next century of human history unfold, initially with amazing prescience. In Everytown (a stand-in for London) in 1940, the
Unrated, 1 hr. 32 min.
Art House & International, Classics, Science Fiction & Fantasy
May 2, 1936 Limited
Feb 1, 2000
United Artists
All Critics (21) | Top Critics (3) | Fresh (21) | Rotten (2) | DVD (9)
Things to Come is an unusual picture, a fantasy, if you will, with overtones of the Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon comic strips. But it is, as well, a picture with ideas which have been expressed dramatically and with visual fascination.
This is England's first $1 million picture. It's an impressive but dull exposition of a bad dream.
Top Critic[An] imaginative, only occasionally naive forecast of the age of nuclear warfare in 1936.
Its lecture-dialogue stilted and ideas simplistic, 'Things to Come' is nevertheless a worthy visual experience.
Essential viewing today for anyone interested in the history of celluloid science fiction, but general audiences will most likely find it to be dull.
A truly epic work which continues to fascinate.
Spookily prescient in many of its ideas, this is fascinating whilst being a little clumsy and dated, even for its time.
In the realm of 'prophetic science fiction', it is a genre landmark.
Wells' heart must have sunk as audiences avoided his impassioned and idealistic -- yet dour and didactic -- cri de coeur.
[Image Entertainment's] original 35mm studio masters ... were themselves far from pristine ... making the phrases 'beautifully restored' and 'pristine new film-to-video transfer' more than a little disingenuous.
An astonishing black-and-white visualization of Wells' view of the future.
Landmark sci-fi achievement by Menzies, and still imitated.
At once dated and weirdly modern, this may not be the film Wells wanted it to be, but it's still more ambitious and impressive than most fantasy cinema of the past 30 years.
I do give this movie credit for being one of the only sci-fi movies of the thirties, seriously I couldn't find that many, there were about two or three others I found. Anyway. I think H. G. Wells' story of Things To Come was probably much better than this movie. Most of the film is montage of footage of so-called
September 21, 2010Super Reviewer
This early sci-fi film, based on an H.G. Wells story, is a good try, but not the classic I had been led to believe it is. Decent special effects for the 30's, and some nifty futuristic machines (I'm sure courtesy of Wells), but especially hammy acting by the leads (Raymond Massey, Ralph Richardson, et al) and truly
January 1, 2008Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures