Average Rating: 3.4/10
Reviews Counted: 89
Fresh: 11 | Rotten: 78
The production design is first rate, but 13 Ghosts is distinctly lacking in scares.
Average Rating: 3.4/10
Critic Reviews: 22
Fresh: 3 | Rotten: 19
The production design is first rate, but 13 Ghosts is distinctly lacking in scares.
liked it
Average Rating: 3/5
User Ratings: 243,816
This haunted house chiller is the second feature from Dark Castle Entertainment, the mid-budget outfit put together in 1999 to remake the cheesy horror genre pictures of William Castle by his daughter, Terry Castle, and producers Gilbert Adler, Robert Zemeckis, and Joel Silver. Financially ravaged and widowed by a fire that is consuming him with guilt, Arthur Kriticos (Tony Shalhoub) is left to raise two kids on his own: beautiful teenager Kathy (Shannon Elizabeth) and grade school student Bobby
Oct 23, 2001 Wide
Apr 2, 2002
$41.6M
Warner Bros. Pictures
All Critics (104) | Top Critics (25) | Fresh (13) | Rotten (81) | DVD (31)
By any objective accounting, Thirteen Ghosts is exactly a baker's dozen too many -- this is a zero of a film.
The drop-dead fact is, this ornate but eerily unspooky production is designed by Hollywood vampires and powered by demographics.
Top CriticBeck maintains a satisfyingly high level of heebie-jeebies throughout.
A nicely nasty Halloween treat.
A B-grade horror picture seems to be a B-grade horror picture no matter how many studio bucks and digital effects you throw at it.
For a movie called Thirteen Ghosts, this movie is surprisingly soulless.
Brutally violent horror remake is a huge waste.
There isn't enough dry ice in the world to conceal the rot of stupidity hovering over "13 Ghosts." With Embeth Davidtz and Matthew Lillard both overacting to a lower power in supporting roles, there apparently also aren't enough acting coaches.
Like the huge glass house that serves as its centerpiece, the film is shiny, sterile, bland, vacuous, and completely pointless.
an update of an original classic b-movie which, despite better technology, fails to drum up much in the scare department and is actually irritating to watch.
July 25, 2007Super Reviewer
This movie was Plainly terrible. The acting was horrible even by horror movie standards, and the story was just horrible. This film did have cool effects, which I did enjoy and kept my mind off the terrible story. In the end, not even the special effects saved this stupid ''horror'' film.
August 9, 2010
Super Reviewer
| 35% | The Hangover Part II |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 81% | Kung Fu Panda 2 |
| 44% | Cowboys & Aliens |
| 83% | Rise of the Planet of the Apes |
| 25% | Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Par... |
| 88% | Lady and the Tramp |
| 69% | A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas |
| 21% | Fireflies in the Garden |
| 45% | The Rebound |
Journey 2 Not Worth the Trip
What are his 10 best movies ever?
See the all-new action-packed trailer!
Five new Marvelous pictures