You may be right. If you are right then the this film is the film equivalent of the great train robbery, by which, a great deal of people, (the spectating public), OF WHICH THERE ARE MILLIONS, have been duped on such a scale (to generate more than 700 million US ((not including the chinese takings)) that maybe, this film is the greatest swindle since apple invented the Iphone. So be it.
Dude, you're using the wrong celebrity to make a statement like that. Dark of The Moon wasn't that great, but it was gold compared to The Sorcerer's Apprentice, Drive Angry, Season of The Witch, and so on...
Yeah only my 50 year old mom thought this movie was dull among a group of 15 people I was with last night. So i lost confidence in another "top critic."
Dude, so serious. Sometimes "appreciation for real cinema" isn't right for certain movies or situations. You'll hate 80% of the movies out there if you're always looking for a deep, story_strong experience.
You must not know what a good film is. The first one was really good. The second one was better. But the third one takes the cake. The story line and plot was really good. I may not have payed attention to the 3D But the whole movie was epic.
I think, as a top critic, she has at least some merit behind her opinion. Not only that, but this movie received a 36% out of 100 on this site. I can understand why someone could enjoy it, but saying that Dana Stevens, or anyone else who wants more from a movie than mindless action and spectacle know nothing of what constitutes for a 'good film' is a joke.
Maybe they should write the movie to sleep? Or make a chick movie? That's only if you agree with the so called critic's. Never go off what they say. If you do you will mess some of the best movies.
Franz Burger
Se impone con urgencia una cambio en la dirección, línea argumental y hasta diseño de los robots, o sea, un "reboot" completo. Michael Bay, vete.
Jun 29 - 11:08 PM