Day One: Production had just passed the halfway point when we arrived on set at the Vancouver Film Studios in May, where The Twilight Saga: New Moon -- or rather, the Untitled Sports Movie, its secret working title -- was weeks away from completion. Scenes featuring Jacob Black and the Wolf Pack had for the most part been filmed. Production was packing up the next week to do the last leg of shooting in Montepulciano, Italy, where Bella would make her fateful run across the town square to stop Edward from committing the ultimate sacrifice. Finicky weather had forced last-minute changes to the shooting schedule, but we'd be given a glimpse that few outsiders had yet seen: the unveiling of New Moon's Volturi.
Inside, a large stage was dressed in meticulous detail as the inner chamber of the Volturi, the ancient Italian vampires who rule the vampire world who appear in the second, third, and fourth Twilight books. The gold-accented central room in this "underground" lair, hidden, according to the book, in tunnels under the town of Volterra, Italy, is an ornate and refined circular room with 30 foot-high ceilings that give it a stark airiness, punctuated by beautiful marble tiled floors and Latin inscriptions.
A sample passage, commemorating the "history" of the vampire race in Latin, reads, "liberte te ex inferis" -- translated, "Save yourself from Hell." (Coincidentally, the same phrase is also inscribed on the blast door in Lost.) Details like these lent a believable sense that history -- even the fictional, vampire kind --is written into the very architecture of the Volturi headquarters.
The centerpiece of the chamber held three throne-like chairs, belonging to the Volturi leaders Aro (Michael Sheen), Marcus (Christopher Heyerdahl), and Caius (Jamie Campbell-Bower). Standing at attention were all of the Volturi guards, all dressed in vaguely European-style finery -- dark hues, sharp lines, and in a range of period styles.
In the midst of it all, cast newcomers Cameron Bright (who plays the psychically-powered Alec), and Dakota Fanning (portraying Alec's sadistic twin, Jane), were playing out reaction shots (to scenes that hadn't yet been shot!) before their days ended early, ostensibly due to child labor laws.
Focus fell particularly on Fanning, dressed in a soft, vintage-style white dress, a dark velvet cape, and Mary Janes. Her blonde hair swept into a bun, with pale skin and scarlet lips and dark eye makeup, she had the look of a textbook Little Red Riding Hood -- albeit one with blood-red eyes and a steely eeriness about her. "She's immune to all of us," Michael Sheen as Aro mused, directing his warrior to turn her pain-inducing powers on Bella. "Shall we, Jane?"
With nary a peep, Fanning's eyes lit up. She turned her head towards Bella/Kristen Stewart, and gave a slight, cruel smile. Well, the hint of a smile, really. The tension was palpable; in that miniscule movement I was sold on Fanning -- at 15 years of age, one of New Moon's seasoned veterans -- and her ability to convey unadulterated malice. On film, you'll see her bring poor Robert Pattinson to his knees, and you might even enjoy it.
Next: Michael Sheen brings Aro gleefully to life, Bella offers herself to save Edward, and Stephenie Meyer and Melissa Rosenberg react to dailies.
|
Jason C Wilkerson writes: on Jul 17 2009 04:26 PM How about we forget the New Moon write up and we get the last installment of Deconstructing Harry which we should have gotten on Wednesday? Where is it Matt????!!!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Jul 17 2009 04:40 PM Hmm. While I understand your anticipation of the last Deconstructing Harry article, I cannot comply. More New Moon! (Reply to this) |
|
tai0316 writes: on Jul 17 2009 04:48 PM Great article! I'm feeling more and more confident that New Moon will be better than Twilight was. (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 17 2009 04:55 PM In reply to this comment (#2528234) I think it almost has to be. Twilight, aside from the casting was a pretty mediocre adaption which was severely shortchanged on the budget. For New Moon, we're getting the same cast, same story, but a lot more money put into making it good. Should be an easy success. One of my few concerns is the ability of the film to maintain Victoria as a credible villain with limited screen time. She wasn't exactly overdeveloped in the first movie and I have to think Robert Pattinson is going to enjoy most of the manufactured screen time. I just hope by the time Ecclipse rolls around we won't be like "Oh yeah, Victoria. Kinda forgot about her". (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Jul 17 2009 05:47 PM Bigbrother, I wouldn't worry too much about Victoria. Rosenberg has alluded to taking the liberty mentioned here to insert more of the missing characters - Victoria, the Cullens - in the film... Rachelle on set spoke with us about the extensive stunt work she was doing, so they certainly kept her busy. (Reply to this) |
|
kaitune writes: on Jul 17 2009 05:59 PM I wonder though that when they do 'Breaking Dawn', are they going to adapt it according to the book or are they going to change things........ I am not much of a Twilight fan, but I am not a hater and I read almost anything I can get my hands on. The books are entertaining in a guilty pleasure way. However, 'Breaking Dawn' book sucks a hell lot. Even my mom and my friends who are Twlight fans hate the last book to death. I have no idea how they might be able to edit out the crappiness of the plot, but I wish that they would do it somehow. 'Twilight' was a so-so film, but 'New Moon' 's trailer looks great. Since I know that I would have to see this film with my friends (and again with my mom), I hope that it would be a much better film. (Reply to this) |
|
Janice Aries writes: on Jul 17 2009 06:14 PM I agree with Whitey-Mcwhite... gimme the Deconstruction Potter Day 6! :D (Reply to this) |
|
GST writes: on Jul 17 2009 06:29 PM Evil, evil, EVIL! Somebody needs to make a Twilight/Buffy the Vampire Slayer crossover, I'd love to see Buffy show Bella how a REAL woman deals with pretty boy creepy vampires. (no offense Jen... I think?) (Reply to this) |
|
Sean H. writes: on Jul 17 2009 08:32 PM If your male and you like this movie/book series then well......your a douche bag. And not just any douche. Like, Summer's Eve' douche. Maybe even a nice Spring Fresh Linen scent. But a douche none the less! Goodnight Cleveland!!!! (Reply to this) |
|
Dreamer S. writes: on Jul 17 2009 09:09 PM Needs more Potter. But I am kind of interested in how Pattinson got kicked off set. (Reply to this) |
|
Shauna R. writes: on Jul 17 2009 09:26 PM Thanks Jen for providing us more New Moon news and not the billionth Potter article! I appreciate it! (Reply to this) |
|
John A. writes: on Jul 18 2009 02:40 AM I think writing "your" when "you're" is grammatically correct (twice in the same post) is far more douchy than liking Twilight. Don't get me wrong, Twilight does suck, just not as bad as grammatical errors. (Reply to this) |
|
Melissa K. writes: on Jul 18 2009 06:44 AM It won't be hard for Wietz to do a better job than Catherine with New Moon... but I hope he does a MUCH better job... I have confidence, I've liked everything I've seen thus far. If the movie is half as good as the book this time around I predict a much bigger box office draw for it... Look how much Twilight made and that was ONLY because of the books... (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 18 2009 06:58 AM In reply to this comment (#2528296) You seem to know a lot about douche my friend. Perhaps first hand knowledge? (Reply to this) |
|
Sean H. writes: on Jul 18 2009 08:54 AM Internet grammer? Ha! You can't be serious. And yes, it does seem like first hand knowledge yea? Bah, I remember when the retorts were at least kinda witty... (Reply to this) |
|
Sean H. writes: on Jul 18 2009 08:55 AM In reply to this comment (#2528356) I love you too! (Reply to this) |
|
JettaJameson writes: on Jul 18 2009 10:13 AM In reply to this comment (#2528296) If you're going to insult people, perhaps learning the difference between "your" and "you're" would be a good idea, first. You're the one who looks like the douche. (Reply to this) |
|
jacog writes: on Jul 18 2009 12:18 PM I opened this thread expecting to find people insulting the franchise and its fans, and I did. Sean H. - you are the crusty remains of an over-spiced chilli's hasty exit from the rear-end of a coyote that found this meal unwittingly in the garbage heap of an organ disposal unit. Your journey through life is like watching an asthmatic gerbil attempt to suck an olive through a straw - could be entertaining, but ultimately of no use to anyone. When your relatives hug you hello, they make it brief, for they are reminded of what it's like to squeeze the bloody puss out of a bulbous boil. (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 18 2009 02:50 PM Yes my friend, because calling someone a douchebag for reading something is the height of wit. Bravo Sir. You have really put us all in our place. (Reply to this) |
|
Bigbrother writes: on Jul 18 2009 02:52 PM Thanks for the info Jen, now I only worry that they're not going to stick close enough to the novels to satisfy the hardcore fans who have made the original a success. As you can probably tell I'm determined to find something to worry about so I don't go into this too content. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |













